Money Is Not Wealth: Temporary - By A.R. Miller

MONEY IS NOT WEALTH


Temporary Bucket (file later)
Subsection 9 of Money Is Not Wealth.


Temporary Bucket (file later)


David French: Trump Is No Longer the Most-Important American. (8-min. podcast; New York Times, via Archive.Today; May 11, 2025)
President Trump is no longer the most important American in the world.
He is certainly the most powerful, at least for three more years, but power is only one measure of importance. On Thursday, a Chicago native and Villanova University graduate named Robert Prevost supplanted Trump. He became the first American pope, taking the name Leo XIV.
And it happened at exactly the right time.

David Nasaw:
Elon Musk Thought He Could Break History. Instead It Broke Him.
(6-min. podcast; New York Times, via Archive.Today; May 11, 2025)
The partnership between the president and the richest man in the world is coming to an end. There is one clear loser in the breakup of this affair, and it is Elon Musk.
He fell from grace as effortlessly as he rose. Like a dime-store Icarus, he took too many chances, never understood the risks and flew too close to the sun. Wrapped in the halo of his social-media super-stardom, he was blinded to the reality of his circumstances until it was too late.
Mr. Musk has already inked several lucrative federal contracts and could get far more, but he leaves Washington with his reputation as a genius jack-of-all-trades - a reputation he relied on to boost his company's stock prices and win investors for his ambitious adventures - severely damaged. Once likened to the Marvel superhero Tony Stark, he is becoming increasingly unpopular. Many formerly proud owners of his Tesla electric cars are trading them in or pasting apologies on their bumpers. Sales have plummeted.
Mr. Musk is hardly the first wealthy businessman to decamp to Washington: The Gilded Age millionaires, top hats in hand, focused on currying favor with the Senate, where laws were made and tariffs determined. With the collapse of the economy, the New Deal and the coming of a world war, the White House began to play a significantly-larger role in directing the economy, and the businessmen paid it more attention. Dozens of them descended on the capital; others joined the cabinet. No matter when or in what position they served, however, they played by Washington's rules, taking on well-defined, limited responsibilities and, for the most part, staying out of public view.
Mr. Musk broke with that tradition. Nobody was going to shut him up or rein him in. ... He and his Department of Government Efficiency deputies spread chaos through Washington, locking staff members out of computer systems, gaining access to personal data on private citizens and identifying government employees they deemed expendable.
At first, President Trump appeared to endorse every cost-cutting move by his unorthodox adviser, declaring on social media that he and his cabinet were "EXTREMELY HAPPY WITH ELON". But Mr. Musk then violated the cardinal rule of Trumpland by daring to criticize the president's policies and appointees - not just once or twice, but with remarkable consistency.
He jumped on his X platform to deride a White House proclamation that Sam Altman, the top artificial intelligence executive and his archrival, and others were going to invest $100-Billion in data centers and in generating the electricity required to power A.I. programs. Mr. Musk proclaimed in an interview that Social Security was "the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time", ignoring the fact that the president had vowed not to cut such spending. He even took issue with Mr. Trump's triumphant "Liberation Day" announcement of sweeping new tariffs.
His bullying and lack of remorse as he slashed federal spending and dismissed tens of thousands of government employees eroded his popularity. He infuriated cabinet members by criticizing them in public, trespassing on their authority and refusing to recognize the White House chain of command.
Fittingly, his reign was effectively brought to an end on April Fools' Day, when the $20-Million he donated to elect a Trump-backed Republican to an open State Supreme Court seat in Wisconsin backfired, propelling more Democrats than Republicans to the polls. It was no longer possible to overlook the reality that the richest man in the world had become a political liability. The day after the Wisconsin debacle, Politico reported that the president had "told his inner circle" that Mr. Musk would be "stepping back in the coming weeks from his current role". In mid-April, Mr. Trump signaled his dwindling regard for Mr. Musk, by replacing his choice for I.R.S. acting commissioner with the candidate favored by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
On April 22, Mr. Musk announced that he was cutting back on his government work so he could spend more time at Tesla, which by then was in so much trouble, reports emerged that the board was considering replacing him as chief executive. (The company denied the assertion.) The reality that hit Wisconsin's polls hit his car company even harder: Sales dropped 20% in the first quarter of 2025 compared with the year before; profits dropped by 70%. The flashy, impractical Cybertruck he had championed proved a flop. In the meantime, Tesla is rapidly losing market share to the Chinese automaker BYD and other established carmakers.
That's not to say Mr. Musk's other business interests - particularly his rocket-launch company, SpaceX, and his satellite unit, Starlink - are suffering. SpaceX is poised to gain billions of dollars from government contracts. The Trump administration has already cleared the way for Starlink to be eligible for the government’s $42-Billion rural-broadband push and even encouraged other nations eager to reduce U.S. tariffs to do business with Starlink. But such promotions would most likely have been the case had Mr. Musk not joined Mr. Trump's administration.
The lesson to be learned here is that there is no room in the American system of government for an un-elected co-president. While elections often yield results we do not expect or desire, we have long proved to be better off with a government composed of elected officials and senior appointments that have gone through the constitutionally-mandated confirmation process. Mr. Musk thought he could be an exception. And that was his undoing.

Mira Rojanasakul: Across America, Big Cities Are Sinking. Here's Why. (New York Times, via Archive.Today; May 8, 2025)
A major reason is too much groundwater is being pumped out, new research shows, threatening buildings and infrastructure nationwide.
A new analysis of America's 28 largest population centers found that all but three are sinking overall, and in many cases significantly.

Several of the most affected areas are in Texas, particularly around Fort Worth and Houston. But the problem is nationwide, affecting cities as scattered as Seattle, Detroit and Charlotte, N.C.
The sinking of land, also called subsidence, can worsen the effects of sea-level rise, intensify flooding and strain the very foundations of urban infrastructure.
The new research, published in the scientific journal Nature Cities, built on previous work using satellite measurements to paint a detailed picture of rising and falling land. It also closely examined the connection between changes in land elevation and changes in groundwater, using data from individual monitoring wells.
Water pumped from wells isn’t something that people think about often. “You just turn on your tap, do what you need to do, and you go on your way,” said Leonard Ohenhen, a researcher at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and lead author of the study.
But extracting more water than can be replenished “can have a direct relationship with what happens on the surface,” he said. “You can cause the ground to sink significantly."
A 2023 New York Times investigation found that unsustainable pumping of water from underground aquifers can be a major cause of sinking land.
Other factors also influence land elevation. For example, a vast expanse of bedrock beneath parts of the country, pressed downward by enormous glaciers during the last ice age, is slowly rebounding back into place. But over time it creates a sort of see-saw effect that today is adding 1 to 2 millimeters per year to subsidence rates in much of the northern United States.
Texas draws immense amounts of groundwater for agriculture, industry and the public water supply. The extraction of oil and gas, including the growing use of “monster fracks,” can also cause the land surface to slump.
Climate change can worsen the issue. Hotter temperatures and more extreme droughts, particularly in the West, dry out soil, streams and reservoirs, leading people to pump larger quantities of freshwater from underground.
Americans have also been moving in droves to some of the hottest and driest parts of the country. In the past few decades, metro areas in Texas have ballooned in population and sprawl.
Groundwater depletion was the main cause of subsidence in Houston between the 1950s and 70s, when nearly all water usage came from the ground, said Bob Wang, a professor of geophysics at the University of Houston. Cracked roads and buildings were a common sight.
Several subsidence-management districts were established in the area to address the issue. Among other things, groundwater use was reduced and instead more water was taken from surface-water sources such as rivers. Subsidence has since slowed in the city center.
However, when new neighborhoods developed to support growing populations, the most affordable source of water was often what people could pump from below.

Julia Angwin:
"This Is What We Were Always Scared of": DOGE Is Building a Surveillance State. (7-min. podcast; New York Times, via Archive.Today; April 30, 2025)
Elon Musk may be stepping back from running the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, but his legacy there is already secured. DOGE is assembling a sprawling domestic surveillance system for the Trump administration - the likes of which we have never seen in the United States.
President Trump could soon have the tools to satisfy his many grievances by swiftly locating compromising information about his political opponents or anyone who simply annoys him. The administration has already declared that it plans to comb through tax records to find the addresses of immigrants it is investigating - a plan so morally and legally challenged, it prompted several top I.R.S. officials to quit in protest. Some federal workers have been told that DOGE is using artificial intelligence to sift through their communications to identify people who harbor anti-Musk or -Trump sentiment (and presumably punish or fire them).
What this amounts to is a stunningly fast reversal of our long history of siloing government data to prevent its misuse. In their first 100 days, Mr. Musk and Mr. Trump have knocked down the barriers that were intended to prevent them from creating dossiers on every U.S. resident. Now they seem to be building a defining feature of many authoritarian regimes: comprehensive files on everyone so they can punish those who protest.
"This is what we were always scared of", said Kevin Bankston, a longtime civil-liberties lawyer and a senior adviser o        n A.I. governance at the Center for Democracy & Technology, a policy and civil-rights organization. "The infrastructure for turnkey totalitarianism is there, for an administration willing to break the law."
PoliticsJOE: Anne Applebaum: Donald Trump Has Re-invented Reality.
(12-min. YouTube video; January 1, 2026)
This year we had Anne Applebaum in the studio to discuss the ideas in her book "Autocracy Inc." During the conversation, Anne went into great depth about the MAGA movement's dismantling of democracy while in power, and how it has moved to question the very basis of fact.
NEW: David Frum Show: Anne Applebaum: The Most-Corrupt Presidency in American History (from 10-min. to 54-min., in 62-min. video; The Atlantic; May 7, 2025)
In this episode of The David Frum Show, The Atlantic's David Frum reflects on the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe, examining how post-war reconciliation - not battlefield triumph - became America's true finest hour. He contrasts that legacy with Donald Trump's recent bombastic Victory Day statement, urging a re-dedication to the values that built a more peaceful world.
David is then joined by The Atlantic's Anne Applebaum (from 10-min. to 54-min. in the 62-min. video) to discuss the astonishing and brazen corruption of the Trump presidency, how authoritarian regimes seek to break institutions, and the hardship of losing friendships to politics.
Finally, David answers listener questions on:
- fostering open-minded political dialogue among polarized high-school students,
- why America hasn't developed a strong worker-based political movement like its European counterparts,
- how to think about class in modern U.S. politics,
- the risk of data suppression under the Trump administration, and
- reflects on whether his long-held conservative values still belong to the political right.
NEW: Irineo Cabreros and Aatish Bhatia: Eight Charts That Sum Up Trump's First 100 Days (data and graphs; New York Times, via Archive.Today; April 29, 2025)
The first 100 days of Donald J. Trump's second presidency have been a study of extremes, especially when compared with the start of presidential terms over the last century.
Compared with other modern presidents, he has:
- signed the most executive orders in this period,
- collected the most tariffs and
- had the most lawsuits filed against him.
- Markets have slumped,
- as have his approval ratings.
Below are eight ways Mr. Trump's first 100 days stand out:
1. He issued more executive orders than any modern president.
2. … and was sued in federal court more, too.
3. Revenue from tariffs increased.
4. The dollar plunged.
5. Markets fell, too.
6. The State Department was quiet.
7. Federal funding for medical research slowed.
8. Trump went from being popular to unpopular.
Although Mr. Trump won the 2024 election only narrowly, he entered office with important strengths and opportunities. Voters said they trusted him to handle issues like the economy, immigration and energy. On each of these issues, the new president had a chance to find public backing for his conservative agenda.
One hundred days into his second term, Mr. Trump's approval rating is underwater. Polls show that he has managed to turn long-term strengths on the economy and immigration into weaknesses.
[For more data and graphs, click above.]
NEW: Dominik Presl: Anne Applebaum: Why Do MAGA Republicans Hate Europe So Much? (10-min. YouTube clip, or full video for patreons; Decoding Geopolitics Podcast,
 4 months ago
18:32
547K views • 1 day ago
New
26:46
Washington Week with The Atlantic full episode, Jan. 2, 2026
Washington Week PBS
82K views • 13 hours ago
New
8:17
'UNDO TRUMP' gains traction as a Democratic campaign message as Trump's popularity plummets
MS NOW
127K views • 10 hours ago
New
25:50
CBS News correspondents share biggest stories of 2025 and what's ahead for 2026
Face the Nation
31K views • 5 days ago
New
23:01
GOP Makes CRITICAL MISTAKE with Jack Smith Deposition
Katie Phang
143K views • 18 hours ago
New
54:26
Truth About Trump's Miserable Mar-a-Lago Christmas | Inside Trump's Head
  (19-min. video; The Daily Beast, ??)
563K views • 6 days ago
New
18:50
Putin in PANIC MODE: Flees to Bunker as Moscow Attack DESTROYS His Inner Circle | Rachel Maddow
Maddow Monologues
58K views • 20 hours ago
New
40:29
Why Republicans Are Finally Abandoning Trump | David Pakman
Democracy Docket
201K views • 4 days ago
New
1:05:21
Nine Portrait Champions Paint Judi Dench Live
Banijay Art
484K views • 2 weeks ago
26:37
Amazon ABANDONS Seattle for Canada - Trump's $15 Border Fee BACKFIRES | Robert Reich
ReichAnalytics
199K views • 3 days ago
New
18:01
Once You Turn 60, the Most Reliable Support Isn’t Family — It’s These 5 Pillars #lifeafter60
Heart of a Winner
21K views • 8 days ago
24:08
Trump Loses Toyota: The $40B Canada Deal That Has Washington Scrambling | Jeffrey Sachs
Sachs Global
273K views • 4 days ago
New
11:12
Four stories to watch out for in 2026
The Economist
260K views • 5 days ago
New


NEW:
Bob Rankin: Tech-Support Rage: Is It Intentional?
(Ask Bob Rankin; August 15, 2022)
If you own any modern appliance or electronic gadget, you've probably suffered the dreaded agony of calling for "Tech Support". Even the most even-tempered human quickly experiences alarming symptoms: sharply increased blood pressure, trembling fingers, reddening face, rising voice, and colorful language. Is it possible that tech-support services are in fact *designed* to elicit such a response from you? Read on for the full story...

NEW: The Top 20 - New Posts In Ask Bob Rankin
- Bob Rankin, 2024

Global Weirding Is Here.
- Thomas L. Friedman (New York Times, February 17, 2010)

NEW: The Lake Book: A Handbook For Lake Protection (4th Ed.; Maine Lakes, 2022)
[Excellent, and free to share. Would that I had this to share, when I was the Executive Director of the Lake Cochituate Watershed Association (LCWA)!]


Return to main section of Money Is Not Wealth.