Money Is Not Wealth: TrumPutin's Theft - By A.R. Miller
MONEY IS NOT WEALTH
TRUMPUTIN'S THEFT OF AMERICAN
DEMOCRACY
(including TrumPutin's Big Bad Bill That
Benefits
Billionaires - and Putin)
Subsection 4 of Money
Is Not Wealth.
TRUMPUTIN'S THEFT OF AMERICAN
DEMOCRACY
"Trump's
Big Ugly Bill" from U.S. Senator Elizabeth
Warren, Timothy Noah's "How
The Billionaires Took Over", an Interesting
Offer from Elon Musk, and far-too-much more):
Simon Tisdall: Here's
The News From Iran – Donald Trump Is Making America Lose
Wars Again. Humiliating
Failure Now Looms, As Symbolically Damaging To U.S. Global
Standing And National Self-Esteem As Afghanistan Or Iraq.
(The Guardian, March 15, 2026)
Donald Trump menaces the world. He's global public enemy
number one. He's steadily losing the illegal war with Iran he
started but cannot stop. His violence-addicted Israeli
sidekick, Benjamin Netanyahu, is terrorising Lebanon. And ordinary
people everywhere, their security threatened, face a huge
economic bill for his reckless folly.
Add Trump's war-making to his daily:
- debasing of democracy,
- appeasing of Russia,
- punitive tariffs,
- climate crisis denial and
- flouting of international law,
and it's clear this White House travesty has gone on long
enough. Americans must put their house in order, and act
decisively to restrain someone who endangers us all.
Trump is a man without a plan. He hasn't the foggiest what to do
next in Iran, deluding himself that he is in control of events.
The more the U.S. and Israel batter Tehran and other cities, the
more defiant is the odious, unvanquished Islamic regime. U.S.
regional bases and Gulf Arab partners are sustaining significant
damage from retaliatory strikes.
[Why yes, there IS more...]
Joseph Cox: The
Removed DOGE Deposition Videos Have Already Been Backed Up
Across the Internet. (links!; 404 Media,
March 14, 2026)
Yesterday, a judge ordered those who uploaded the videos to YouTube
to remove them. By today, a backup of the videos was
available online as a torrent and on the Internet
Archive.
Joseph Cox: We
Watched 6 Hours Of DOGE-Bro Testimony.
Here's What They Had To Say For Themselves. (3-min.
YouTube video; 404 Media, March 13, 2026)
Over the course of a six-hour-long-or-so deposition, Justin Fox,
a former-investment-banker-turned-DOGE-bro:
- refused to define what he believes counts as
DEI;
- admitted he used ChatGPT to scan
government contracts for terms such as "Black" and
"homosexual" but not "White" or "Caucasian";
- and said that one of the grants he helped slash was "not for
the benefit of humankind" - before walking that claim back.
I watched all of Fox's deposition from start to finish. The
terse exchanges, the circular arguments, the pregnant pauses,
all of it. The videos, available publicly on YouTube,
were released as part of a lawsuit by the Modern Language
Association, American Council of Learned Societies, and American
Historical Association. They provide fascinating, and perhaps
horrifying, insight into the thinking of someone inside DOGE.
Even with Fox's inability to answer seemingly easy questions, the
responses are still illustrative of the recklessness and
ham-fisted nature of a group of young, inexperienced people
who caused massive damage across the U.S. government, leading to
negative consequences outside of it. DOGE as an
organization has been linked to 300,000 deaths due to its cuts
and multiple significant data breaches. All the while, DOGE did
not actually reduce the government's deficit.
Jayar Jackson: MAGA
In CHAOS, As DOGE Deposition Reveals STOLEN Data Scheme.
(13-min. YouTube video; WatchlistTYT, March 12, 2026)
Elon Musk's DOGE team thought they could quietly move
Social Security data through Signal chats and private servers,
but
- a whistle-blower,
- a court filing and
- a trail of voter-roll investigations
are now exposing how the Trump administration's operation may
have crossed the line from "waste and fraud" talking points into
something far more dangerous.
Michael Cornelison: Steve
Witkoff: Stupid Or Traitorous? (Substack,
March 12, 2026)
Steve Witkoff, Trump's ambassador for everything
(Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Gaza, Iran-USA-Arabs) has long been
a mystery to me. Who is this guy? Lately, this has
become more clear.
Witkoff (and his accomplice Jared Kushner), have
gotten a lot of money from the Arab Gulf states, and plan on making
lots more money from rebuilding Gaza. Now something else has come to
light.
Multiple news outfits are reporting that Russia has been
giving targeting information to Iran, causing U.S. military
assets in the Gulf region to get blown up. Iran's Foreign
Minister admitted this is happening, and called Russia a
"strategic partner". Trump officials, when asked, did not
seem to care.
In a TV interview, Witkoff was asked about Trump's talks with
Russian officials regarding the intelligence-sharing. His response:
"I can tell you that on the call with POTUS, the Russians
said they have NOT been sharing. That's what they said. We
can take them at their word." (NOT emphasis added.) So,
Witkoff trusts the Russians, and Iran's Foreign Minister was lying?
What is it with Witkoff? Probably he is loyal to Putin,
but stupidity cannot be ruled out. Recall, also, that
he negotiated a "peace plan" for Ukraine that amounted to a
list of Putin's demands. That plan was thrown out and replaced
with a more-balanced plan - that still calls
for Ukraine to give up more territory than the Russians have
conquered.
Glenn Kirschner: Staggering
Revelations In The Epstein Files! All The "King's" Men:
Trump's Lackeys And Their Disservice To America. (15-min.
YouTube video; March 11, 2026)
We just got one heck of an Epstein-files update. We know that state
law enforcement authorities in New Mexico are now investigating
Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro ranch. That is the scene of allegations of
horrific crimes by Epstein, Maxwell, and others, and it's good
that the New Mexico law-enforcement authorities are investigating.
But the obvious question is: Why wasn't the Zorro ranch searched
by law-enforcement authorities:
- when they searched Epstein's home in New York,
- when they searched his home in Florida,
- when they searched his home on his infamous island?
Well, we now know the answer to that question: Donald
Trump's Department of Justice told the New Mexico law
enforcement authorities to halt their investigation!
This video takes on this dramatic and deeply-troubling new
revelation.
Emily Singer: Trump
Says He Can End The Iran War Whenever He Wants. So Why Hasn't
He? (cartoon by Jack Ohman; Daily Kos,
March 11, 2026)
In a sign he's clearly worried about the negative economic
and political consequences of the ill-advised war he started in
Iran, President Donald Trump called up yet another reporter
today to insist that everything is going great. He also
said that he will end the conflict "soon" because there is
"practically nothing left to target".
"Little this and that ... Any time I want it to end, it will
end", Trump told Axios' Barak Ravid in a five-minute
phone conversation.
Trump's ridiculous claim that he can simply decide when
the war against Iran will stop is patently absurd. Iran is not
a rational actor. It doesn't care about the suffering of
its people, nor about preserving the non-existent relationships it
has with other western nations. So long as it has munitions
and the ability to cripple the global economy by choking
off the Strait of Hormuz - a waterway critical to the global oil
supply - it has no incentives to stop.
Bill Clinton*: "Most
People Have No Idea What's About To Happen, After A Week Of
Hormuz Being Closed." (24-min. Somvati
Rana/YouTube AI podcast, March 10, 2026)
*- [DISCLAIMER: SOMVATI RANA is an
independent, fan-made channel not affiliated with Bill
Clinton, his campaign, or any political organization. The
videos are inspired by public speeches and
verified news for educational and analytical purposes only.]
"Strait of Hormuz closed, oil prices surge, Iran war 2026 - what
happens next?" In this video, Bill Clinton shares his political
perspective on the biggest oil-supply disruption in history.
After U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iran killed Supreme Leader
Khamenei, Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz, sending Brent crude
past $110/barrel and gas prices soaring to $3.47/gallon in just one
week. Clinton breaks down:
- the leadership failures,
- the insurance-driven shipping shutdown nobody planned for,
- the collapse of Iraqi oil production,
- Iranian strikes on Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, and
- why this crisis threatens not just your wallet,
- but American democracy itself.
From war powers violations to fractured alliances to the real
risk of $150 oil, this is the analysis mainstream media won't give
you. Whether you support or oppose this war, the consequences
affect every single American.
Emily Singer: Trump's
War Spikes Gas Prices - And Gets Iran A Worse Leader.
(cartoon
by Mike Luckovich; Daily Kos, March 9, 2026)
- Seven American service members are dead,
- dozens of Iranian children were murdered by a U.S. missile strike,
- oil is raining from the skies to poison the air for thousands of
people living in Iran following an Israeli missile strike,
- and oil and gas prices worldwide are surging, as
- the war has led to the blockade of a critical waterway used to
transport oil.
But hey, at least we have a new Iranian leader who is in some
ways worse than the murderous oppressor whom the United States
killed a little over a week ago!
Indeed, Iran announced yesterday that it replaced
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei with his son Mojtaba
Khamenei. The 56-year-old religious cleric lost his mother,
wife, and a son, as well as his father, to U.S. strikes.
Given his relative youth, Iran's new supreme leader could have
many years left to reign over the nation with an iron fist.
That means we:
- spent $Billions,
- lost American lives, and
- potentially decimated the global economy, only to
- put in someone who may in fact be more extreme than
the previous guy, who brutally oppressed both dissenters
and women.
Heather Cox Richardson: Iran War
& Cowboy Individualism (6-min. video
summary; YouTube, March 8, 2026)
Heather Cox Richardson highlights the Trump administration's
"cartoonish" approach to the Iran war, rooted in "cowboy
individualism", and its severe real-world consequences.
- From campaign merch at dignified transfers
- to submarine attacks on unarmed vessels,
- the true cost of this conflict is becoming painfully clear.
Watch the full summary video to understand the historical context
and unfolding crisis!
NEW: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: "There Is A Cover-Up
Afoot": Sen. Whitehouse Unravels Disturbing Trump, Epstein,
And Russia Ties. (47-min. YouTube video,
March 5, 2026) Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) takes to the Senate
Floor to recap the mountain of circumstantial evidence
laid bare by courageous survivors and journalists connecting
Trump, Epstein, and Russia.
Mahbod Seraji: This
Is Not A Regime-Change War. Iran Is Being Pushed Toward State
Collapse. The U.S. And Israel Have Killed Ayatollah
Khamenei, But They Seem To Have No Plan For What Comes Next.
(Truthout, March 3, 2026)
The U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran has already sparked
regional war, and threatens to reshape West Asia for years to come.
The military strikes began on February 28, killing Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei and several of his top officials.
Now, several days into the war, the rationale has not been
clearly articulated; U.S. lawmakers and officials have offered up
different, often competing explanations for the initial attack and
end goals.
Yet the massive American military buildup in the region in the weeks
before the attack made it evident that something significant was
coming, even as negotiations between Iranian and American officials
continued, and even as the Omani foreign minister declared the night
before the initial strike that an agreement was within reach.
Despite Khamenei's death, President Trump has said the
strikes will continue. To what end?
- If Iran's nuclear facilities and capabilities
were already obliterated during last year's U.S. strikes, as
Trump has long claimed, what is now the objective?
- The elimination of remaining leaders, as U.S. forces
attempted in Iraq?
- The dismantling of the Revolutionary Guard?
- The state's total collapse?
Those objectives presume that the Islamic Republic is a
pyramid resting on a single figure. It is not.
- Iran's regular army, the Artesh, numbers roughly 375,000
personnel. The Revolutionary Guard - Iran's military,
political, and economic powerhouse - counts approximately 125,000 or
more. The Basij, Iran's voluntary paramilitary organization,
maintains around 90,000 active members and can mobilize 450,000. By
some estimates, nearly one-million individuals serve in or
alongside the state's security structure. As of this writing,
the regime has not collapsed, and these forces remain
intact.
- In an eight-minute video released at the beginning of the
bombing campaign, President Trump urged Iran's army, police,
Revolutionary Guard, and Basij to lay down their arms and
called on citizens to take control of their government.
That appeal assumes a rapid implosion of the state's coercive
machinery. But institutions of that scale do not
dissolve because they are told to. Hundreds-of-thousands of
armed men do not disarm overnight and hand the country to
foreign powers or spontaneous civic committees.
- If the expectation is that bombing will accelerate internal
democratic change, recent events suggest otherwise.
Iran was already under severe strain. A banking crisis and sharp
currency devaluation triggered nation-wide protests that began
at the end of 2025, involving everyone from students and workers to
bazaar merchants. Security forces responded with brutal force.
Human-rights groups reported thousands of civilian casualties;
authorities reported losses among their own ranks. The
protests had begun to re-emerge when the bombs fell.
- Airstrikes do not create space for civic mobilization. They
drive people indoors. When foreign aircraft strike cities,
citizens do not gather in public squares demanding reform. They seek
shelter. Within 24 hours of the start of the military strikes,
hundreds of Iranians were reportedly killed, including students at a
girls' school in Hormozgan Province. Whatever fragile momentum
for internal change existed has now been interrupted by war.
- Following from the confusion about Trump's plan for this war,
another question quickly follows: If the current leadership
collapses, who governs?
- There is no unified opposition inside Iran with institutional
capacity to assume control. The Islamic Republic's
opponents are fragmented: reformists, republicans, labor activists,
student networks, ethnic movements, and monarchists often disagree
not only on leadership but on the structure of a future state. The
current government has also spent decades repressing any
of these forces that could come as a reasonable threat to its
power, suffocating space for democratic debate.
- Among the most visible figures in exile is Reza Pahlavi,
the son of Iran's former shah. A segment of the Iranian
diaspora regards him as a transitional leader and speaks as though
his succession is self-evident. On social media and satellite
networks, some supporters already frame him as the natural
heir to a post-Islamic Republic Iran.
- But diaspora visibility is not the same as governing
legitimacy inside the country. Reza Pahlavi commands no formal
political party within Iran, no known alliance with senior military
officers, and no organized structure capable of securing ministries,
borders, or public order in a moment of upheaval. His father and
grandfather ruled through authoritarian control, and for
many Iranians, especially those who experienced imprisonment,
censorship, or repression under the monarchy, that history remains
unresolved.
Restoration of the Pahlavi regime overlooks the institutions that
still exist: the Revolutionary Guard, regional power brokers,
clerical networks, provincial patronage systems, and armed groups
unwilling to surrender authority to a figure whose base of support
is largely external.
Even prominent American officials appear unconvinced. Donald
Trump has suggested that Reza Pahlavi lacks the necessary support
and capacity to lead Iran. "He seems very nice, but I don't know how
he'd play within his own country", Trump told Reuters in
January. "I don't know whether or not his country would accept his
leadership, and certainly if they would, that would be fine with
me." Of the monarchists, one anonymous U.S. official told Politico,
"They scare me."
- Leadership in a country of more than 90-million people
does not materialize through wish or nostalgia. It requires institutional
alignment, territorial control, and internal legitimacy, none of
which can be assumed from exile.
- Iran's internal complexity deepens the uncertainty
about "What now?". Although Persians form a majority of
Iran's population, the country includes substantial Azeri,
Kurdish, Baluch, Arab, and Turkic populations. These
communities are deeply-integrated into national life, yet historical
grievances and regional tensions persist. It's important to
remember that grievances against centralized state power in Iran
long predate 1979. Ethnic and regional minorities often
faced cultural and political marginalization under the Pahlavi
monarchy, including denial of national rights and suppression
of uprisings in outlying provinces. These long-standing
issues helped fuel broader discontent that contributed to the
revolution. Efforts at "nation-building" under the Shah also
involved policies aimed at linguistic and cultural
homogenization, which many non-Persian communities
experienced as exclusionary and repressive. In stable times,
such tensions are contained by a functioning center. In unstable
times, they resurface quickly.
- In the northwest, Azeri communities share
linguistic and cultural ties with the Republic of
Azerbaijan.
- In the southeast, Sistan and Baluchistan endured
decades of insurgency and state neglect.
- In the southwest, Khuzestan holds much of Iran's oil
and contains a significant Arab population with a history
of separatist sentiment.
- Kurdish regions are connected to broader Kurdish
movements across Iraq, Turkey, and Syria.
A prolonged vacuum in Tehran would not produce
orderly transition. It would invite regional intervention,
militia mobilization, and competing territorial claims.
Fragmentation would not be theoretical. It would be violent.
History offers sobering examples:
- The disintegration of Yugoslavia led to ethnic war and
Balkanization.
- The 2003 invasion of Iraq unleashed sectarian conflict that
reshaped the state.
- NATO's intervention in Libya preceded years of militia
competition.
- Afghanistan's 20-year war ended with the return of the Taliban.
Iran is not identical to those cases. But the belief that
sustained bombing can engineer stable democracy has
repeatedly been disproven.
War does not operate with surgical precision. It does not
remove one figure and install another:
- It shifts power to those most capable of wielding force.
- It weakens civil society faster than it builds alternatives.
- It deepens grievances that last generations.
Removing leadership is not the same as constructing
governance.
- The price of this ambiguity around the future will not be
paid primarily by generals or politicians. It will be paid by students
in Shiraz, factory workers in Isfahan, merchants in Tabriz,
families in Mashhad - by people who have already
endured sanctions, repression, and economic collapse.
- Iran is more than its rulers. It is a layered society held
together by history and shared memory. Remove the center
without a viable replacement and you do not create democracy.
You create a vacuum. And in this region, vacuums rarely
remain empty. They fill with militaries, militias, foreign
proxies, and wars that often outlive the people who start them.
If the architects of this attack have a plan for the morning
after, they have not shared it. If they believe the story ends
with the fall of one man, history suggests otherwise.
February 28 may not mark the end of a regime. It may mark the
beginning of a far-more-dangerous uncertainty - the
destabilization of a nation.
[Long, but one from which to learn.]
Andy Sullivan and Richard Cowan: Bill
Clinton To Lawmakers Investigating Epstein: "I Saw Nothing."
(2-min. video; Reuters, February 27, 2026)
Summary:
- Clinton says he would have turned Epstein in, had he seen
evidence of crimes.
- Democrats accuse Justice Department of cover-up, say Trump must
testify.
- Clinton flew on Epstein's plane several times in the early
2000s.
- First time a former president has been compelled to testify to
Congress.
Richard Cowan and Ryan Patrick Jones:
Hillary
Clinton Tells Congressional Panel She Has No Information On
Epstein. (3-min. video; Reuters,
February 26, 2026)
Summary:
- Hillary Clinton denies meeting Epstein or visiting his
properties.
- Accuses GOP panel of deflecting from Trump's Epstein ties.
- Democrats question missing Epstein-related files from DOJ.
Barak Ravid: Israel
Bombs The Council Choosing Iran's Next Supreme Leader,
Official Says. (Axiom, February 3, 2026)
The Israeli Air Force today struck the
building housing Iran's Council
of Experts in the holy city of Qom
in an attempt to disrupt the process of appointing a new
supreme leader, an Israeli defense official
said.
Why It Matters: The Council of Experts is the body
within the Iranian regime with the authority to appoint a new
supreme leader. The clerics on the council vote on a
short list of candidates being drafted by a smaller secret
committee.
Driving The News: The Israeli defense official
said the strike took place while votes were being counted.
- It isn't clear how many of the council's 88 members were
in the building at the time, or the extent of the damage.
- "We wanted to prevent them from picking a new supreme leader",
the official said.
Barak Ravid: Earthquake
In The Gulf: Iran War Expands To A Dozen Countries In 72
Hours. (Axios, March 2, 2026)
Just 72 hours after the U.S. and Israel began bombing Iran:
- the war has consumed nearly the entire Middle East,
- reached the gates of Europe, and
- raised new fears of attacks on American soil.
Why It Matters: The sheer geographic scope of the war
is staggering:
- directly involving at least 11 countries,
- disrupting the global flow of oil and gas, and
- rattling markets worldwide.
President Trump said today that Operation Epic Fury
is designed to last four to five weeks. In that window, the
conflict has significant room to expand further.
The Big Picture: The Middle East had barely caught its
breath.
After two years of war across Israel, Gaza, Lebanon and Yemen,
a U.S.-brokered ceasefire last October had only brought relative
quiet to the region.
Now comes another earthquake - and by early measures,
a far larger one.
Driving The News: Iran had warned prior to the
war that any attack on its soil would trigger retaliation
not just against Israel, but against U.S. bases across the
Gulf and in Iraq.
- In the opening hours of the war, Iran launched waves of
ballistic missiles and drones at Israel, the UAE,
Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar.
- Iran also struck the Kurdish region of Iraq, which
it views as closely-aligned with the U.S. and Israel. Pro-Iranian
militias attacked U.S. bases in Iraq, and their
supporters attempted to storm the U.S.-Embassy compound in
Baghdad.
- On the second day, Iran expanded its strikes to Saudi
Arabia and Oman - the country that had been
instrumental in brokering nuclear negotiations between
Tehran and the Trump administration.
- Today, debris from two Iranian drones struck an Aramco oil
refinery in Saudi Arabia - the first such attack since
2019.
- Qatar - another key mediator between Tehran
and Washington - said it downed two Iranian fighter jets and
condemned the "reckless and irresponsible" targeting of its
territory.
The Other Side: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi
and other officials have insisted that Iran is not at war with
the region - only targeting Israel and U.S. military
bases.
- But Iranian drones and missiles have struck numerous
civilian targets across the Gulf, including tourist
areas of Dubai.
- That gap between Iran's stated position and its actions is
pushing several regional countries to consider joining the
war and retaliating directly against Iran, Arab
sources tell Axios.
Between The Lines: Iran has also moved to strangle
commercial shipping in the Gulf, attempting to close
the Strait of Hormuz by vowing to set fire
to any ship that passes through.
- The U.S. has sunk several Iranian naval vessels and
- insists oil supplies remain stable, despite
- 20% of global crude shipments passing through Hormuz.
- The attacks have significantly-curtailed exports, and Qatar's
suspension of liquefied natural gas production sent energy
markets sharply-higher Monday.
Zoom In: Last night, Hezbollah
entered the war - launching missiles and drones at Israel
and opening a new front on the Lebanon border.
- Israel responded with massive airstrikes across
Lebanon, including in Beirut, killing
several senior Hezbollah commanders.
- Hezbollah's decision to join the fighting had been
one of the key unknowns for U.S. and Israeli intelligence.
Though badly degraded by years of Israeli strikes, the group
remains Iran's most-powerful proxy.
- So far, its attacks have been limited and largely-intercepted
by Israeli air defenses - leaving Israeli officials
questioning why the group chose to enter the war without full
force.
- "Everyone in Hezbollah is a target now", one Israeli
defense official warned.
- In a remarkable development, the Lebanese Cabinet
voted today to ban all Hezbollah military activity on
Lebanon's soil. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam called on the
group to immediately surrender its weapons.
The Intrigue: Over the past 24 hours, drones struck
the British Royal Air Force base at Akrotiri in Cyprus -
dragging Europe into the conflict for the first time.
- Cypriot press reported that all indications suggest the drones
were launched from Lebanon by Hezbollah,
linking the attack directly to the group's entry into the war.
- Cyprus - which currently holds the EU's
rotating presidency - postponed a planned ministerial summit
in the wake of the attack.
- Greece announced it is sending two frigates and two
fighter jets to help defend the island.
Zoom Out: The three major European powers - the U.K.,
France and Germany - have signaled they could
get actively involved in the conflict.
- In a joint statement, their leaders said they would "take
steps to defend our interests and those of our allies in the
region, potentially through enabling necessary and
proportionate defensive action to destroy Iran's capability to
fire missiles and drones at their source."
- The first concrete step came from British Prime Minister Keir
Starmer, who announced he would allow the U.S. to use British
air bases in the region to launch strikes against Iranian missile
and drone storage depots and launchers. A source with
knowledge of the process said this could include British
bases in the U.K., Cyprus, or Diego Garcia in the Indian
Ocean.
What To Watch: The Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen
have not yet entered the war, but have signaled they are
preparing to do so.
The Bottom Line: The war is already being felt back in
the American homeland.
- The FBI and DHS placed counter-terrorism
teams on high alert and a DHS bulletin warned of
a "heightened-threat environment" - flagging potential
terror plots and cyberattacks by pro-Iranian
hacktivists.
- The U.S. Capitol announced heightened
security measures today.
- In Austin Texas, a mass shooting is being investigated
as potential terrorism linked to the conflict.
Ken Klippenstein: Why
We Struck Iran - The Machine That All But Made The
Decision Itself. (Substack, March 2, 2026)
We attacked Iran because the target was simply too tempting
to pass up, military sources tell me.
No consideration was given to the what, the so what
or the then what, I’m also told. The "high-value
targets" were just too valuable: the Ayatollah, the
Chief-of-Staff of the Army, the Minister of Defense - at least
40 senior officials in total were killed.
Trump "approved" what was all-but-impossible not
to approve. The president is captive to an intelligence
machine built over decades, that now produces kill
packages so clean and seductive that it practically runs
itself.
As the Pentagon bluntly put it, "a large-scale U.S.
strike cut off the head of the snake", summarizing its
view of a crisp decapitation operation.
Trump gets away with all of this by pretending we're not
actually at war - a falsehood with which Congress is
happy to play along. Asked if the U.S. is at war with
Iran, Sen. Lindsey Graham told Meet the Press: "I don’t
know if this is technically a war." Absurd as that
sounds, Democratic leaders are adopting the same framing. Sen. Chuck
Schumer says the strikes are "risking wider conflict",
as if this isn't already that; Rep. Hakeem Jeffries
says the operation has "brought us to the brink of a possible
war", as if this isn't already war.
If killing a 36-year-long head of state and his deputies isn’t
war, what is?
The United States IS at war with Iran,
pure and simple. We have been for decades:
- We supported Iraq in its war against Iran.
- We've conducted special operations inside Iran.
- We've shot at Iranian coastal installations.
- We've sunk Iranian ships.
- We've undertaken constant covert operations in the
shadows, from actual sabotage to planting cyber viruses.
- We shot down an Iranian civilian airliner.
- We attacked targets on land.
- We conducted thousands of strikes against Iranian proxies
in multiple countries from Yemen to Lebanon.
- We’ve labeled the country "part of the Axis of Evil".
- We killed Quds Force head Qasem Soleimani in an aerial
assassination.
- We bombed Iranian nuclear-related sites.
- We've thwarted Iranian attacks on Israel and others, maintained a
tripwire ground force in Kuwait, and hardened installations in the
region. [True, but when did defending allies become bad?]
From Jimmy Carter to Donald Trump, through Republican and Democratic
administrations, the United States has:
- frozen countless billions in Iranian assets;
- sanctioned Iranian companies;
- cut off Iran from the world banking system;
- banned Iranian oil imports and exports; and
- penalized non-U.S. companies investing in the country.
- We have designated the nation, Iranian organizations, and Iranian
individuals as state sponsors of terrorism and foreign
terrorist organizations.
Add to this history that today, the American military machine
continues to do its thing. In two-and-a-half decades of war
since 9/11, it has perfected the ability to find and destroy
a target, ANY target. I've previously written about the
fundamental change that has occurred in the nature of warfare
in the practice of decapitation. As we see here in
the latest, the U.S. and Israel carried out an opening blow that
killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and dozens
of other Iranian leaders.
That military feat itself is the "reason" we are where we
are. Pure and simple, meticulous intelligence work
identified the routines and locations of the Ayatollah and others
in Iran's national-security apparatus; when a set of meetings
on Saturday morning were pin-pointed, the tight-as-a-rubber-band
machine snapped into action.
"Calling this 'starting a war' is a Democratic
talking-point", Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said today,
adding: "This is the elimination of a threat that has
existed since 1979."
Because we were already at war with Iran and have been for
decades, those in charge didn't think they had to ask
permission (or even if they did, that they had
time to do so). The target is hot, red hot, and we
need to strike now to gain the maximum advantage,
the briefers say. Yes, there are intelligence and diplomatic
people who fret about the consequences, but like the wusses
in Congress, they are brushed aside because "This is an
opportunity we can't pass up."
That's how it's been explained to me.
[And that's while AI is only partially in charge...]
Robert Reich: Sunday
Thought: Trump's Real Reason For War (Substack,
March 1, 2026)
Trump and Netanyahu's attack on Iran is premised on a
gossamer web of assumptions and inferences. Trump says
Iran:
- has enough nuclear material to build a bomb within days,
- will soon have long-range missiles capable of hitting the
United States, and
- plans an attack.
But he has offered NO evidence. Most experts say he's wrong.
Here's the real reason for this war. Trump wants it to
divert Americans' attention from everything that's gone to shit on
his watch:
- the economy,
- ICE's cruel raids and murders,
- the crisis in public health as exemplified by the
measles epidemic,
- our loss of friends and allies around the world,
- his boundless corruption, and
- his increasing unpopularity as shown in plummeting
polls.
- Oh, and there are the Epstein files, rapidly closing in
on the man whose history of sexual assaults and braggadocio
[AND his criminal actions to hide the evidence] make
his complicity highly likely.
[indeed; and there's more, such as:
- evading Congressional Checks-and-Balances,
- this past week's right-wing take-over of most of the
main U.S. media AND a big chunk of Internet services,
- further diminishing of Free Speech at home and abroad -
- except for TrumPutin's own, increasingly-awful use of Free
Speech, and
- his revenge on the ethical AI company that objects
to
- mis-use of its AI (Claude) by our military
and ICE
- to squelch Free Speech,
- to wage wars (including this week's new war),
- to steal elections
- and to take vast wealth from We, The People for
himself and his outrageously-wealthy cronies.
NEW: How Iran's
Leader Was Killed. (14-min. YouTube video;
fern.tv, March 2, 2026)
[Excellent coverage w/4K video, history and details of the first
strike.]
Harrison Mann: I Was A
U.S. Intelligence Analyst. Israel And The U.S. Are Lying To
You About Iran. (Zeteo, March 1, 2026)
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
have launched their most-dangerous war yet, but the
pretenses underpinning it are weaker than ever. You're
already being bombarded by lies from the White House, the
Capitol, and TV commentators.
Here are seven truths behind the half-hearted
arguments meant to manufacture consent for a war you never
asked for:
[We share the ONE of seven that can be viewed without a paid
subscription.]
1. This War Won't Keep Americans Safe.
Trump says he launched this war to "defend the American people
by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime". He
apparently expects us to forget he used this lie the last
time he bombed Iran. What was true in June still is true now:
- There's no evidence the Iranian government is on the
verge of developing a nuclear weapon (despite Netanyahu's
claims to the contrary for the past 30 years),
- the Iranian military does not have weapons that can strike
the U.S. (despite Trump's claim to the contrary)
– a fact confirmed by my old employer, the Defense Intelligence
Agency, and
– Iran's leaders had no intention of pre-emptively attacking
U.S. forces in the Middle East.
The Trump administration's pained justification that Iran
planned to fire missiles "preemptively, but if not, if not
simultaneous, against with any actions against them", is
beyond dubious given that the Iranian government watched
U.S. forces posturing to attack for weeks and did
not, in fact, launch a pre-emptive strike against
them (and "simultaneous" is an exceptionally-creative
way to say "firing missiles after we start attacking
them").
If Iran really represented an immediate threat to the
American people, why has Trump been telegraphing this attack since
mid-January? What is true is that the Iranian
government's missiles, drones, and proxies can strike U.S. forces in
the region, which is exactly what started
happening yesterday after U.S. planes started bombing Iran.
Anyone who actually wanted to keep U.S. forces safe
could simply move them out of the region and
out-of-range of Tehran's capabilities – or, even easier –
just avoid starting a war of choice with them in the
first place.
Associated Press/Jon Gambrell, Melanie Lidman, Josh Boak and Eric
Tucker: Iran's
Supreme Leader Killed In Major Attack By U.S. And Israel.
(AP News, February 28, 2026)
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in a
major attack by Israel and the United States, Iranian state
media confirmed, throwing the future of the Islamic
Republic into doubt and raising the risk of regional
instability.
President Donald Trump announced the death hours earlier, saying it
gave Iranians their "greatest chance" to "take back" their country.
State media reported that the 86-year-old was killed in an airstrike
targeting his compound in downtown Tehran. Satellite photos from Airbus
showed that the site was heavily bombed.
Associated Press/Brian Melley: What
To Know About The New US-Israel Attacks On Iran
(AP News, February 28, 2026)
The U.S. and Israel attacked Iran today in a massive operation
that President Donald Trump said:
- killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei while
- targeting military capabilities and
- aiming to stop Tehran from creating a nuclear weapon.
There was no comment on Khamenei by Tehran, while Trump urged
Iranians to seize the moment and "take over".
In counterattacks, Iran fired drones and missiles at Israel and
aimed strikes at U.S. military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait
and Qatar. Exchanges of fire continued into the night. Iranian
state media, citing the Red Crescent, this evening said at
least 201 people had been killed and more than 700 injured.
Ali Larijani, the secretary of Iran's National Security Council,
said Israel and America will "regret their actions".
The strikes came two days after the latest U.S.-Iran talks, as
Trump pressured Tehran for a deal to constrain its nuclear
program and built up a fleet of warships in the region.
Iran's theocracy also has struggled with growing dissent following
nation-wide protests that began over the economy but turned into
anti-government ones.
The U.S. military said it was looking into reports of civilians
killed in Iran in today's strikes. At least 115 people were reported
killed and dozens wounded at a girls' school in the south, the local
governor told Iranian state TV.
World leaders reacted with caution, and the U.N. Security Council
met in an urgent session.
NEW: Herb Scribner: 6
Ways Trump Escalated Military Force In His Second Term.
(Axios, February 27, 2026)
President Trump hasn't been shy about deploying the U.S. military
during his second term.
Why It Matters: Despite promoting himself as a
"president of peace", he's deployed the U.S. military in
multiple American cities and across the globe, striking
Iran and others, raiding Venezuela and striking suspected drug
boats in the Caribbean.
- Trump's military actions may take another turn soon, with the
possibility of war with Iran on the horizon.
Driving The News: The U.S. evacuated its embassy
staff in Israel today, signaling that a joint
U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran could be imminent,
Axios' Barak Ravid writes.
- There are many reasons why the U.S. may hit Iran again,
including the damaging Israeli and U.S. strikes last year - a
major escalation in Trump's use of military force.
What They're Saying: "Under President Trump,
America is respected again, and our military has restored
its reputation as the strongest and most powerful on the planet.
All of the President's actions have made our country safer and
the world more stable", White House spokesperson Anna
Kelly tells Axios.
Read more below about where Trump has sent the military.
Iran Strikes Last Year: The U.S. joined the 12-day
war between Israel and Iran in June 2025 by taking out
Iran's underground nuclear facilities, which led to historic
escalation in the Middle East. Trump said at the time that
the strikes were a "spectacular military success" and claimed
Iran's key uranium enrichment sites "have been completely and
totally obliterated." The attack on Iranian nuclear
facilities led to widespread backlash from Congress, with many
arguing Trump needed congressional authorization for
such a use of military force.
Nigeria On Christmas: Trump announced, on Christmas day,
that the U.S. military "launched a powerful and deadly strike
against ISIS." U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) said
the strikes were in Sokoto State. "May God Bless
our Military, and MERRY CHRISTMAS to all, including the dead
Terrorists, of which there will be many more if their slaughter
of Christians continues", Trump wrote on social media at
the time. Trump had previously warned about potential U.S. military
action in Nigeria, pointing to violent attacks against both
Christians and Muslims.
"Drug-Boat" Strikes In The Caribbean: U.S. military forces
started battering ships and alleged "drug boats" with
lethal airstrikes, in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific in
late 2025. Many officials said the campaign aimed to curb the
flow of drugs.
- The strikes then shifted toward pursuing oil and later
seizing tankers as a part of a move against Venezuela.
- Some congressional backlash followed, with lawmakers calling
for transparency and posing legal questions about Trump's
authority.
Venezuela Raid In January: Trump sent 150 aircraft into
the skies in a stunning raid on former Venezuelan leader Nicolás
Maduro's fortified compound. The raid up-ended the
Venezuelan government.
- Soon after, President Trump teased using military action
against other countries across the world.
(Note: The U.S. military used Anthropic's
Claude AI model during that operation, which has now led
to a high-profile standoff between Anthropic and the Pentagon
over military use.)
Aircraft Carriers To Iran: Trump recently sent two
aircraft carriers to the region outside Iran, building speculation
that another strike may happen. The U.S. sent the USS
Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier and its strike group to the
Middle East in February. The Ford joined the USS Abraham
Lincoln and its strike group in January.
Military In U.S. Cities: Trump has deployed National
Guard troops in D.C. and temporarily in Los Angeles and
New Orleans amid his immigration-crackdown and
law-enforcement surge. He also pushed for troops
in Chicago and Portland, among other cities,
but faced legal challenges that seemed to disrupt his plans.
What We're Watching: The president has threatened to
use the Insurrection Act - a rarely-invoked power that
lets him put soldiers on American streets. No president
has used it since 1992.
[I'm watching that gross mis-use of Artificial Intelligence (AI).]
Stephanie Liechtenstein: U.N.
Nuclear Watchdog Says It's Unable To Verify Whether Iran Has
Suspended All Uranium Enrichment. (AP News, February 27,
2026)
Iran has not allowed the United Nations nuclear agency access to
its nuclear facilities, bombed by Israel and the United States
during a 12-day war in June, according to a confidential report by
the watchdog circulated to member states and seen today by The
Associated Press.
The report from the International Atomic Energy Agency
stressed that it "cannot verify whether Iran has suspended all
enrichment-related activities", or the "size of Iran's uranium
stockpile at the affected nuclear facilities".
Iran has four declared enrichment facilities, but the report warned
that because of the lack of access, the IAEA
"cannot provide any information on the current size, composition
or whereabouts of the stockpile of enriched uranium in Iran".
The report stressed that the "loss of continuity of knowledge
... needs to be addressed with the utmost urgency".
Iran has long insisted its program is peaceful, but the IAEA
and Western nations say Tehran had an organized
nuclear-weapons program up until 2003. The U.S. is seeking a
deal to limit Iran's nuclear program and ensure it does not
develop nuclear weapons.
Associated Press/Ben Finley and Jamie Stengle: Scouting
America Will Alter Policies To Maintain Support From U.S.
Military: Pentagon (ABC News, February 27, 2026)
Scouting
America will alter several policies at the urging of the
Pentagon, including a requirement that members use
"biological sex at birth and not gender identity",
Defense
Secretary Pete
Hegseth announced today.
Some of the changes mirror what the organization suggested to the
Defense Department in January, which included:
- discontinuing its
Citizenship in Society merit badge,
- introducing a
Military Service merit badge, and
- waiving registration fees
for the children of military
personnel.
Under Hegseth, the Pentagon has taken aim
at the military's partnership with Scouting America,
decrying its historic rebrand in 2024 from the Boy
Scouts and other changes in recent years that he
sees as part of "woke culture" efforts that he wants
to root out.
Hegseth said
in a video posted on X that
the
Pentagon will cease its support of Scouting
America if it fails to comply. "We hope that
doesn't happen, but it could", Hegseth said.
"Ideally
I believe the Boy Scouts should go back to
being the Boy Scouts as originally founded, a group that
develops boys into men. Maybe someday."
Scouting America, which is based in Irving, Texas, didn’t
immediately comment. The organization began
allowing
gay youth in 2013, ended a blanket ban on
gay
adult leaders in 2015 and announced in 2017 that it would
accept transgender students. It began accepting
girls
as Cub Scouts as of 2018 and into the flagship Boy Scout
program -
renamed
Scouts BSA - in 2019. As of May 2024, more than 6,000 girls
had earned the coveted
Eagle Scout rank.
The
Pentagon said in a statement earlier this month that
it was reviewing its relationship with
Scouting America,
claiming
it had "lost its way" in many ways and calling the
organization's diversity, equity and inclusion efforts
"unacceptable".
Emily Pickering: University
Professor And Nobel Laureate Richard Axel, CC '67, To Step
Down As Zuckerman Institute Co-Director, Following Epstein
Ties. (Columbia Spectator, February 24, 2026)
University Professor and Nobel laureate Richard Axel, CC '67,
will step down from his role as co-director of the Zuckerman
Mind Brain Behavior Institute - after Spectator
revealed earlier this month that he maintained an 11-year
friendship with convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The Office of Public Affairs announced Axel's resignation in
a statement today. Axel, who co-founded the Zuckerman
Institute, will retain his role as a University Professor
and continue research in his lab.
"What has emerged about Epstein's appalling conduct, the harm
that he has caused to so many people, makes my association with
him all the more painful and inexcusable", Axel wrote.
Axel corresponded with Epstein from at least 2010 - two years after
Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor -
until five months before Epstein's 2019 suicide in prison, though
Axel had spoken favorably of Epstein as early as 2007. His close
relationship with Epstein was revealed in the Department of
Justice's Jan. 30 trove of unsealed files. Mortimer
Zuckerman, namesake of the neuroscience institute, also
corresponded with Epstein after his conviction, according to the
files.
Axel and his wife, Cornelia Bargmann, were repeatedly invited to
Epstein's private island in 2011. Epstein used his island, located
in the U.S. Virgin Islands, as a base for his child-sex-trafficking
operation. In one instance, Epstein, through his personal assistant,
offered to buy Axel and Bargmann's flights with his credit card. At
least one set of tickets were voided two days before the flight was
set to occur, according to records previously obtained by Spectator.
A University spokesperson wrote in a previous statement to Spectator
that Axel and his wife never visited the island.
"My past association with Jeffrey Epstein was a serious error in
judgment, which I deeply regret", Axel said in a statement
alongside his resignation. "I apologize for compromising the
trust of my friends, students, and colleagues. I recognize the
problems this has caused, and I will work to restore this trust."
Axel will also step down from his position as an investigator
at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, which
will continue to fund members of Axel's lab "to allow completion of
their current research", according to an updated version of the
statement.
"The University has seen no evidence that Dr. Axel violated
any University policy or the law", the statement reads.
"However, Dr. Axel made clear that in light of this past
association, and the continued fall-out from the release of DOJ
files, he felt it appropriate to relinquish his position as
co-director", the statement continues, adding that the
University "agrees with this decision, while at the same time
recognizing his extraordinary contributions."
Camille Gijs and Hans Joachim Von Der Burchard: EU
Loses Patience Following Trump's Latest Tariff Threat.
European Commission Demands "Full Clarity" On Washington's
Plans, As A Top EU Trade Lawmaker Calls To Delay A Key Vote
On EU-US Trade Deal.
The Delay Will Have To Garner Support Among The
EU's Political Groups During An Extraordinary Meeting Set
For Monday (Tomorrow) Afternoon. (podcast;
Politico, February 22, 2026)
BRUSSELS: "The European Commission requests full clarity on
the steps the United States intends to take following the recent
Supreme Court ruling on the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (IEEPA)", the Commission said in a
strongly-worded statement issued after Trump announced yesterday
that he wants to impose a new global tariff rate of 15%. "The
current situation is not conducive to delivering 'fair,
balanced, and mutually-beneficial' transatlantic trade and
investment".
EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič spoke with U.S.
Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary
Howard Lutnick yesterday (Saturday), as the EU grapples
with the uncertainty of whether its trade agreement (struck in
Scotland last summer) still applies in light of Trump's
latest tariff threats.
The quickly-evolving situation pushed a senior EU trade lawmaker
to urge the European Parliament to
postpone a vote on legislation implementing the EU's side of its
transatlantic trade deal. Trump's imposition of a
15% global tariff following Friday's high-court defeat is "a
clear breach of the deal we had agreed", Bernd Lange,
chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, told Politico
today. "I will therefore propose that we suspend ratification
of the agreement for the time being."
Lange said he could not rule out "renegotiating the
agreement". The German Social Democrat earlier today
decried "pure tariff chaos from the US administration",
in a social-media post on X. "No one can make sense
of it anymore - only open questions and growing uncertainty for
the EU and other US trading partners. The terms
of the Turnberry Agreement and the legal basis on which it was
built have changed", Lange said in the post. "Do new
tariffs based on Section 122 not constitute a breach of the
deal? Regardless, no one knows whether the U.S. will adhere
to it - or even be able to", he added in his post. "At
our extra meeting tomorrow, I will therefore propose to the EP's
negotiating team putting legislative work on hold
until we have a proper legal assessment and clear
commitments from the US side".
The Greens, via their lead lawmaker on the file Anna Cavazzini,
said: "The vote on the Turnberry Agreement in the
European Parliament should be paused until we have clarity.
It was clear that Trump's tariffs were illegal under
international law. Now we also have confirmation that they were
also illegal under U.S. law."
[Click above for more - and stay tuned!]
Trump
Hikes Global Tariffs To 15% Following Supreme Court Ruling.
Trump "Just Announced A NEW 15% TAX On The American People. He
Does Not Care About You", Said Gov. Gavin Newsom.
(Common Dreams, February 21, 2026)
Shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court on
Friday ruled against President Donald Trump's use of emergency
powers to impose sweeping tariffs, the Republican announced
plans for a 10% global import tax under another law. By today,
he'd hiked it to 15%.
In a 6-3 decision penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the
high court found that "nothing" in the text of the
1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)
"enables the president to unilaterally impose tariffs".
Trump responded by not only lashing out at the justices,
but also invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 for
a 10% global tariff beginning February 24.
Then, in a Truth Social post this morning, Trump said:
"Based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the
ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American
decision on tariffs issued yesterday (after MANY months of
contemplation) by the United States Supreme Court,
please let this statement serve to represent that I, as
President of the United States of America, will be, effective
immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries,
many of which have been 'ripping' the U.S. off for decades,
without retribution (until I came along!), to the
fully-allowed, and legally-tested, 15% level. During the
next short number of months, the Trump Administration will determine
and issue the new and legally-permissible Tariffs, which will
continue our extraordinarily successful process of Making
America Great Again GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE!!! Thank
you for your attention to this matter."
Last week, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), ranking member of the Senate
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, released a
report laying out how Trump's economic policies, particularly
the tariffs, "are making life unaffordable for millions of
American small businesses, their workers, and their customers."
Markey held a virtual press conference with Massachusetts small
business owners celebrating yesterday's Supreme Court ruling.
The senator said that "for the last year, Trump has created
Pain on Main with an affordability crisis plaguing communities
across the country. At the heart of it are Trump's tariff
taxes. The Supreme Court did what was right and struck down
these illegal tariffs. Trump said the small businesses who
brought this case hate our country. He's wrong. Small
businesses ARE our country", Markey continued. "I
will keep fighting until every cent illegally collected from
small businesses, consumers, and families in Massachusetts and
across the country has been returned."
[More presidential baloney from our baloney president - plus a
proper response by OUR Senator Markey. Click above to read a few
more of the many official criticisms...]
Chris Walker: Trump
Attacks Justices As "Unpatriotic And Disloyal" After Tariffs
Ruling. Allowing The Tariffs To Stand Would Be
A "Transformative Expansion" Of Unchecked Presidential Powers,
The Court Ruled. (Truthout, February 20, 2026)
The United States Supreme Court today ruled that most
tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on nearly every
country in the world were done so illegally. The decision
upholds a lower court ruling that found the tariffs to be
unconstitutional, and thus, unenforceable.
In a 6-3 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts, who penned the
majority opinion, explained that the court disagreed with the
Trump administration's view that the executive branch could
impose tariffs at will, without congressional approval, by
determining they were warranted through so-called "national
emergencies". The main law that the administration cited
in its defense of the tariffs, the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), does not
include the word "tariff" in it, let alone confer the power for
presidents to issue tariffs or other taxes unilaterally.
"The President asserts the independent power to impose tariffs on
imports from any country, of any product, at any rate, for any
amount of time", Roberts wrote. "But the wording of IEEPA
"cannot bear such weight".
The majority also noted that the powers of imposing "taxes,
duties, imposts, and excises" rest within Congress's powers, not
the president's.
[Right on!]
The Abstract/Becky Ferreira: At
the World's Largest General Science Meeting, Surviving Trump
Is the Topic. (podcast; 404 Media, February 21,
2026)
"This is really a turning point and we're in a historical
transition at present."
Welcome back to the Abstract! This week, we have a very
special edition of the newsletter packed with everything I saw and
heard at the American Association for the Advancement of
Science (AAAS) meeting, held in Phoenix from February 12 to
14.
Founded in 1848, AAAS is the world's largest general
scientific society, with over 120,000 members. It operates
with the mission of advancing "science, engineering, and
innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all people",
according to its website.
It's also the publisher of Science, a leading
collection of journals that have graced this newsletter many times.
The over-arching theme this year was the damage
inflicted on the U.S. science sector by the Trump administration
and how to best respond to it. Since Trump returned to office,
his team has:
- terminated or frozen 7,800 research grants,
- laid off 25,000 scientists and personnel from research
agencies, and
- proposed budget cuts of 35% to federal science funding,
amounting to $32-Billion, according to Nature.
It's a crucial issue goal for American science leadership that
also is reverberating through the global scientific community.
But experts at the meeting highlighted the bright spots in the
darkness, as the world learns to respond to the new normal.
Without further ado, here are the highlights from the meeting.
[Every article within this article promises to be
fascinating - once all the links are working...]
The Daily Blast/Greg Sargent: Trump
Erupts in Angry Panic Over 2026, as Polls Take Truly Brutal
Turn. (17-min.
podcast: New Republic, February 19, 2026)
As new polls look dire for the GOP, a data analyst dives deep into
the numbers, explaining how Trump's twin failures on the economy
and immigration are creating unusual opportunities for Dems.
Donald Trump has the midterms on his mind. A few days ago, he
erupted in a wild tirade on Truth Social, raging about
voter fraud and voter ID while urging Republicans to make them
central in the elections. He's now pinned this rant to the top of
his feed. Over the last 24 hours, he's been on a tear,
elevating half a dozen other tweets on these topics. By
"warning" that Republicans must centralize voter fraud, he's
actually telling them to engage in mass voter-suppression or
perish.
Trump has good reason to panic: One new poll has his approval
at 38%. Another survey puts Democrats ahead in the House ballot
match-up by six points. And polling averages find Trump's
approval on immigration, his "good" issue, at abysmal lows.
We talked to Lakshya Jain, head of political data for The
Argument. He explains why:
- the numbers are even worse for Trump if you dig into the
details, particularly on the economy,
- why it's so unusual that Trump is tanking on two GOP issues,
the economy and immigration,
- and why that is creating unexpected opportunities for
Democrats.
Listen to this episode here.
A transcript is here.
Michael Cornelison: Understanding
Trump, With Michael
Wolff: Behaviors And Implications (Substack,
February 16, 2026)
I just finished viewing two podcasts from Michael Wolff's online
YouTube series, "Inside
Trump's Head". Michael Wolff also has written two
books about Trump, mostly critical. He is no fan of Trump. Despite
this, Trump sometimes calls Wolff on the telephone, an attempt to
influence him or pretend he is a friend. Wolff's observations of
Trump are based on his own interactions and those of others who are
willing to discuss their interactions with Trump. Wolff details
Trump's behaviors, without asking why he behaves as he does. I
have listed below a summary of Wolff's observations (at least how
I understood them). Following this, I speculate about what lies
behind Trump's behavior.
[Insightful, and it correlates well with Trump's sick public record.
Is it a coincidence, that this was posted on Presidents
president's resident's Day in the USA?]
Travis Gettys: Melania's
Real Home Revealed By Trump Biographer, As She Distances
From President. (49-min.
video; RawStory, February 13, 2026)
Author Michael Wolfe has concluded that first lady
Melania Trump isn't living in Florida or Washington, D.C., but
is instead pursuing personal business opportunities away from her
husband.
The writer told The Daily Beast's "Inside Trump's Head"
podcast that the 55-year-old's relationship with President
Donald Trump is “remote at best", and he has discovered, while
trying to serve her with a lawsuit, that she most likely
lives in New York City.
ICE Deports Babson College Student "Home" To Honduras:
(More to be added here.)
NEW: Michael Casey: U.S.
Apologizes For Mistake In Deporting Massachusetts College
Student, But Defends Her Removal. (1-min. AP
video; Associated Press, January 14, 2026)
The Trump administration apologized in court for a "mistake"
in the deportation of a Massachusetts college student who was
detained trying to fly home to surprise her family for
Thanksgiving, but still argued the error should not
affect her case.
Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, a 19-year-old Babson College
freshman, was detained at Boston's airport on Nov. 20 and
flown to Honduras two days later. Her removal came despite an
emergency court order on Nov. 21, directing the government to
keep her in Massachusetts or elsewhere in the United States
for at least 72 hours.
Lopez Belloza, whose family emigrated from Honduras to the
U.S. in 2014, is currently staying with grandparents and
studying remotely. She is not detained and was recently visiting
an aunt in El Salvador.
NEW: Holly Ramer: College
Freshman Is Deported Flying Home For Thanksgiving Surprise,
Despite Court Order. (Associated Press, November
28, 2025)
A college freshman - trying to fly from Boston to Texas to
surprise her family for Thanksgiving - was instead deported to
Honduras in violation of a court order, according to
her attorney.
Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, 19, had already passed through
security at Boston Logan International Airport on Nov. 20 when
she was told there was an issue with her boarding pass, said
attorney Todd Pomerleau. The Babson College student was
then detained by immigration officials and within two days,
sent to Texas and then Honduras, the country she left at age
7. "She's absolutely heartbroken", Pomerleau
said. "Her college dream has just been shattered."
According to U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, an immigration judge ordered Lopez
Belloza deported in 2015. Pomerleau said she
wasn't aware of any removal order, however, and the
only record he's found indicates her case was closed
in 2017. "They're holding her responsible for
something they claim happened a decade ago, that she’s
completely unaware of, and they're not showing any of the
proof", the lawyer said.
The day after Lopez Belloza was arrested, a federal judge
issued an emergency order prohibiting the government from
moving her out of Massachusetts or the United States for at
least 72 hours.
ICE did not respond to an email Friday from The Associated
Press, seeking comment about violating that order. Babson
College also did not respond to an email seeking comment.
Lopez Belloza, who is staying with her grandparents in Honduras,
told The Boston Globe she had been looking forward to
telling her parents and younger sisters about her first semester
studying business. "That was my dream", she said. "I'm
losing everything."
Wajahat Ali and Caleb Ecarma: Epstein's
Silicon Valley Connections Lead to the Trump White House.
(55-min. Substack video; The Left Hook, February 7, 2026)
Billionaires partied with Epstein, indulged in his criminal and
perverse appetites, and shared his racist, destructive ideology
that sought to destabilize the world order to escape
accountability.
Wajahat Ali, with Brian J. Karem and Kim Kelly:
BEZOS
and Billionaires MURDER The Free Press. (69-min.
YouTube video; The Left Hook, Febuary 5, 2025)
Jeff Bezos is worth nearly $250-Billion, yet under his
ownership The Washington Post is being gutted.
From Bezos to Elon Musk and Larry Ellison, billionaires
aligned with authoritarian politics are consolidating media
power and attacking the free press.
On The Left Hook, Brian J. Karem, former White
House correspondent, and Kim Kelly, labor journalist,
explain how this coordinated media takeover threatens
democracy itself.
Anand Giridharadas: It's
So Much Bigger Than Epstein. What The Epstein Files Really
Reveal. (The.Ink, February 2, 2026)
Today, with renewed attention on the Jeffrey Epstein files after
Friday's release of millions-more records, we can finally bring
you the full text, un-pay-walled, of my November essay for
The New York Times on what I learned by reading the
first trove in its entirety. And, above, for the first
time, an audio version, read by me.
As journalists comb through the Epstein emails, surfacing the name
of one fawning luminary after another, there is a collective
whisper of "How could they?" How could
such eminent people, belonging to such prestigious institutions,
succumb to this?
A close read of the thousands of messages makes it less
surprising. When Jeffrey Epstein, a financier turned convicted
sex offender, needed friends to rehabilitate him, he knew
where to turn: a power elite practiced at disregarding pain.
At the dark heart of this story is a sex criminal and his
victims - and his enmeshment with President Trump. But it
is also a tale about a powerful social network in which
some, depending on what they knew, were perhaps able to look
away because they had learned to look away from so much other
abuse and suffering:
- the financial meltdowns some in the network helped
trigger,
- the misbegotten wars some in the network pushed,
- the overdose crisis some of them enabled,
- the monopolies they defended,
- the inequality they turbocharged,
- the housing crisis they milked,
- the technologies they failed to protect people
against.
John Timmer: Court
Orders Restart Of All U.S. Offshore-Wind Construction.
Trump Admin's "It's Classified" Ploy Put On Hold In Five
Different Cases. (Ars Tecnica, February 2, 2026)
The Trump administration is no fan of renewable energy, but it
reserves special ire for wind-power. Trump himself has
repeatedly made false statements about the cost of wind-power, its
use around the world, and its environmental impacts. That
animosity was paired with an executive order that blocked
all permitting for off-shore wind and some land-based projects,
an order that has since been thrown out by a court that
ruled it arbitrary and capricious.
Not content to block all future developments, the
administration has also gone after the five offshore-wind
projects currently under construction. After temporarily
blocking two of them for reasons that were never fully elaborated,
the Department of the Interior settled on a single
justification for blocking turbine installation: a
"classified national-security risk".
The response to that late-December announcement has been uniform:
The companies building each of the projects sued the
administration. As of Monday, every single one of
them has achieved the same result: a temporary injunction
that allows them to continue construction. This,
despite the fact that the suits were filed in three different
courts and heard by four different judges.
Based on reporting elsewhere, some of the judges viewed the
classified report that was used to justify the order to halt
construction, but they didn't find it persuasive. In one case, the
judge noted that the government wasn't acting as if the
security risks were real. The threat supposedly comes
from the operation of the wind turbines, but the
Department of the Interior's order blocked construction while
allowing any completed hardware to operate.
"If the government's concern is the operation of these facilities,
allowing the ongoing operation of the 44 turbines, while
prohibiting the repair of the existing turbines and the
completion of the 18 additional turbines, is irrational",
Judge Brian E. Murphy said. That once again raises the possibility
that the order halting construction will ultimately be held to be
arbitrary and capricious.
For now, however, the courts are largely offering the wind
projects relief because the ruling was issued without any
warning or communication from the government and would clearly
inflict substantial harm on the companies building them.
The injunction blocks the government's hold on construction until
a final ruling is issued. The government can still
appeal the decision before that point, but the consistency among
these rulings suggests it will likely fail.
Several of these projects are near completion and are likely to be
done before any government appeal can be heard.
David Corn: The
Return Of A Dangerous Trump Conspiracy Theory (Mother
Jones, Our Land, January 31, 2026)
My fellow citizens, I'm here to report to you that your president
is bonkers.
Okay, many of you know that. Donald Trump has repeatedly
demonstrated his connection to reality is tenuous. But to
his credit (if we must):
- His ability to create and live in a distortion field free of
facts has worked out quite well for him.
- His malignant narcissism had been good for his career.
- His other pathologies have helped him win the immense
power he needs to compensate for his paranoia,
profound insecurity, and cognitive decline.
Still, every once in a while, we are presented with a reminder of
how truly bananas the most powerful man in the world
is. That happened this week.
"Dangerous
Question": Trump's Quip At The Premiere Of "Melania"
- A High-Budget Documentary, Executive-Produced By The First
Lady. (New Delhi TV News, January 30,
2026)
US President Donald Trump, his wife Melania Trump and other top
members of his administration were at the John F. Kennedy
Center for the Performing Arts to attend the premiere of "Melania".
The documentary has been financed at a whopping $75-Million
by Amazon MGM Studios. At first, Amazon MGM
Studios paid $40-Million to license the project
and a related docu-series scheduled for release later this year on
Amazon Prime Video. The first lady is one of the
producers of the documentary, which talks about the 20 days
leading up to Trump's 2025 inauguration as well as the family's
return to the White House.
Besides this, the studio coughed up another $35-Million to
promote and distribute "Melania", which is
being made available across 25 territories outside North America,
Reuters reported. Promotional ads are expected to be seen
in various places, including London's Piccadilly Circus. Jeff
Bezos, Amazon's chairman, contributed to
Trump's inaugural fund earlier this year.
Directed by Brett Ratner, the documentary offers rare access to
the private life of the first lady, who has kept a low public
profile during Trump's second term in office. The trailer for "Melania"
starts on Inauguration Day in January last year and highlights her
role as an adviser to the U.S. President, including the moment
where she encourages her husband to emphasize "peacemaker and
unifier" [!] in his inaugural address.
Among the top Trump-administration officials who attended the
premiere were Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F.
Kennedy, Jr., Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth.
The documentary is being screened in about 1,700 theaters in the
U.S. and Canada today.
David Corn: Nuremberg. (2-min.
YouTube preview video; Mother Jones, Our
Land, January 27, 2026)
[Also see: "Nuremberg"
(2025 film); Wikipedia, updated January 31,
2026]
Nuremberg. It's far too appropriate a time to watch a
movie about the Nazi war-crime trials. Eighty years later, we're
still trying to figure out what turns humans into monsters and an
entire society into a genocidal culture of hate and evil. As the
movie notes, the trials - the first time nations had assembled to
prosecute former government officials for plotting and waging
aggressive war and for crimes against humanity - set an important
precedent for the international order. That was the intention of
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson (Michael Shannon), who led
the prosecution. In the film, he is a noble warrior for justice
who must use his wiles to persuade the Truman administration and
the Brits, Soviets, and French to mount these proceedings. Half
of the movie is his heroic tale of striving to establish a legal
framework for Never Again.
The emotional guts of the movie is the lesser-known story
of Douglas Kelley, an Army psychiatrist assigned to
examine the personalities and assess the mental statuses of the
captured Nazi officials set to go on trial - most notably Hermann
Goring, the Reichsmarschall and the most senior of
Hitler's henchmen to be captured. This was the challenge for
director and scriptwriter James Vanderbilt: How to depict
Goring not merely as a one-dimensional diabolical evil-doer -
but as a person who's worth getting to know, yet deserves no
sympathy. Russell Crowe took on the task of portraying
Hitler's top aide as both an engaging and repulsive man. And Rami
Malek as Kelley is almost a stand-in for Vanderbilt, as he
attempts to get close to Goring without falling for his charm and
intelligence. Goring claims he did not know about the camps and
was only a military man honorably serving his government. And
Kelley develops a complex and fraught bond with Goring, as he
tries to understand the German and the other Nazi prisoners - to
gather material for a book that Kelley assumes will earn him fame
and fortune.
The film is mostly accurate, though full of the usual dramatic
license. As could be expected, at a key point, the Jackson and
Kelley narratives intersect to benefit the forces of good and
righteousness. But what fascinates the most is Goring. How
does the son of a middling diplomat and the godson of a wealthy
Jewish physician and businessman become such a fanatic and a
critical part of one of history's largest mass-murder machines?
(The godson of a Jew is an interesting backstory.) And how do
he and his fellow Nazi prisoners process what the Reich
wrought?
"Nuremberg" delivers no answers to the
questions we are compelled to ponder about: the Holocaust, the
men responsible for it, and the descent of an entire nation into
murderous authoritarianism. How does evil triumph? But Vanderbilt
raises all this without being heavy-handed. These are
topics that deserve constant attention, even if we cannot
resolve them.
At Nuremberg, such questions were applied to the most
enormous of sins. But they're also relevant for what
we see at home and abroad these days:
- The lust for power,
- The demonization of marginalized communities,
- The weaponization of hate and bigotry,
- The widespread use of propaganda,
- The tribalization and cultification of politics,
- the love of violence.
Who embraces this? Who falls
prey to it? "Nuremberg"
reminds us that we can never stop asking.
Outcry
In Italy, As U.S. Says ICE Agents Will Join Olympics
Delegation (5-min. podcast; New York
Times, January 29, 2026)
The Italian government said it had requested clarification from
American diplomats, after D.H.S. said that ICE agents would
help secure the U.S. Olympic delegation next week in northern
Italy.
[And not just the ice-skaters..]
Sophie Hurwitz: The
Trump EPA Ended The "Green New Scam". A Year Later,
Communities Are Still Paying The Price. (Grist,
January 22, 2026)
Across the country, communities that lost grants have responded in
a variety of ways - suing the government, searching for other
funds, or simply moving on.
Lisa Needham: Republicans
Vow They'll Stop Trump's Greenland Crusade - LOL.
(Daily KOS, January 20, 2026)
In the dead of Scandinavian winter, a bipartisan group of U.S.
lawmakers has trundled off to Denmark to say that, no, you totally
should not listen to President Donald Trump about how he wants to
invade Greenland, and it's all going to be totally fine - trust
us.
Of course, the big, declining toddler-president's desire to eat
Greenland just because he can has been kicking around for a while
now, but things got especially dicey Thursday after Vice President
J.D. Vance hosted a meeting between Denmark and the White House.
Seth Meyers: Trump Gets
Nobel Peace Prize from Venezuela's María Corina Machado.
(13-min. YouTube video; Late Night, January 20, 2026)
Seth addresses Trump signing an executive order to protect
Army-Navy football games from competing broadcasts and more in his
monologue, before taking a closer look at Trump sending a message
to Norway about the Nobel Peace Prize and threatening to invade
Greenland.
Robert Reich: Office Hours: What
Should We Do About The Fascist Now Loose Upon America And
The World? We're Now In A Far More Dangerous And Violent
Stage Of Trump's Regime. What Should Be Done To Stop It?
(Substack, January 14, 2026)
Trump's reign of error and terror is spinning out of control:
- Minneapolis becoming a war zone.
- Americans murdered in the street.
- The Justice Department declaring the shooter innocent.
- Investigators quitting.
- Oligarchs contributing to the shooter's defense fund.
- The FBI investigating the victim's wife.
- Meanwhile, a criminal indictment of the head of the Federal
Reserve because he won't cut interest rates.
- Investigations of Democratic senators.
- Trump and Hegseth committing war crimes.
- Trump claiming to be president of Venezuela.
- Trump deciding which companies will get access to its oil.
- Setting up slush funds in other countries to take the spoils.
- Threatening imminent war on Iran.
- Refusing to turn over the Epstein files, even though
Congress demanded them.
From Minneapolis to Caracas, from Chicago to Greenland, from
Washington, D.C., to Tehran, Trump's lawless violence - and
his threats of even-more violence - are increasing. The civil
liberties of Americans are ever-more endangered. His flouting
of Congress and defiance of international law are growing.
What can and should be done?
[We should be done with tRUmPutin!]
Ken Klippenstein: U.S.
Freezes Visas To 75 Countries. Read The Leaked Diplomatic
Cable. (Substack, January 14, 2026)
In the latest sign of the sheer scale of the administration's war
on immigration, the State Department has moved to pause all
immigrant-visa issuances for applicants from 75 different
countries, according to a U.S. diplomatic cable leaked to me.
That's over one-third of the total number of countries in
existence (193)!
Effective January 21, the directive was signed by Secretary of
State Marco Rubio earlier today. Citing the Immigration and
Nationality Act, the order claims concerns over
immigrants being "financially self-sufficient" as the supposed
reason for the freeze.
"President Trump has made clear that immigrants must be
financially self-sufficient to protect public benefits for
American citizens", the cable reads. "Applicants from these
countries are at a high risk for becoming a public charge and
recourse to local, state, and federal government resources in
the United States."
[Since Trumputin has taken away more public benefits -
including our democracy and so many of its capable
administrators - than do immigrants, why not fix that
problem first?]
Robert Reich: Trump's
Ass-Backward "affordability" Agenda?
Here's A REAL Affordability Agenda! (3-min.
summary YouTube video; Substack, January 13, 2026)
The latest gauge on inflation, released this morning, showed prices
increasing 2.7% in December compared with the same
period a year ago. Food prices were up 3.1%. (Reminder:
Trump was elected on two issues: bringing prices
down, especially food, and avoiding foreign
entanglements.)
Today, Trump traveled to Detroit to deliver an address to the Detroit
Economic Club. It was about "affordability" and he
filled it with lies, such as:
- Americans aren't paying for his tariffs. (Of course they
are!)
- Inflation is "way, way down". (It's about the same as it was
when he took office.)
- He insisted that "affordability" is a "fake word by
Democrats".
Unfortunately for Trump, "affordability" has become even more
politically potent than immigration or crime. And in his first
year at the helm, he's made America less affordable.
He’s also been putting forward some ass-backward ideas for
"bringing down prices" that will actually increase them.
His biggest:
- Fire the current chair of the Federal Reserve Board,
- Install a chair who'll lower interest rates,
and
- Thereby, in Trump's addled brain, "bring down" the costs
of borrowing to buy homes and cars. (In his speech
today, he called Fed chair Jerome Powell, a "jerk".) Trump's
decision to open up a criminal investigation of Powell
is a bizarre escalation of his pressure-campaign against
the central bank to cut interest rates. And it's truly
ass-backwards. Without an independent Fed committed to
using interest rates to fight inflation, everyone who
buys or sells or invests will have to assume the risk of
runaway prices in the future. The result is a risk
"premium" that makes everything more expensive instead
of more affordable.
---
What should be done to make America more
affordable? Ten common-sense initiatives:
1. Get rid of Trump's tariffs. Trump's blanket,
unpredictable, on-again-off-again, gigantic and then
sometimes-modest tariffs have caused prices to jump on just about
everything. That's because tariffs are import taxes that are paid
by the companies that do the importing - and by their
consumers. Tariffs can be a tool to create American jobs,
but only if they're used in a targeted and responsible
way. "Targeted" and "responsible" are two adjectives that no
one uses in describing Trump's tariffs. The first step to make
life more affordable for the average American is to get rid of
them.
2. Bust up monopolies. Trump’s overriding goal is to boost
share prices. He doesn’t seem to understand that most Americans
aren’t directly affected by share prices: Over 90% of the value of
shares held by Americans is held by the richest 10%; over half by
the richest 1%. In pursuit of high share prices, Trump has
essentially given up on anti-trust enforcement. Big corporations
are now merging and buying up potential competitors at a rapid
rate. But this means less competition, and less competition
results in higher prices. It’s another ass-backward approach to
affordability. Trump’s overriding goal of high share prices
collides with what should be the real goal: keeping prices low.
A real Affordability Agenda would bust up big corporations that
dominate their industries, and prohibit price gouging.
3. Fight for stronger unions. Trump hates unions,
and has done everything he can do to weaken the National Labor
Relations Board and the Labor Department. He's given free
rein to corporate union-busting. Here again, Trump’s goal of high
share prices and corporate profitability is at direct odds with
the needs of average workers for higher wages, which are necessary
if the goods and services they require are to become more
affordable to them. Workers need more bargaining power to get
higher wages. Unions do that. A real affordability agenda
therefore would make it easier for workers to start or join them.
4. Raise the national minimum wage. For the same reason
Trump believes unions and higher wages are bad for the economy -
that is, his definition of the economy, which is the stock
market - he’s been dead set against raising the national
minimum wage. But the federal minimum wage has been stuck at a
measly $7.25 since 2009. Raise the damn wage! And raise it even
higher for employees of big corporations that pay their top
executives hundreds of times more than their workers.
5. Pass Medicare For All. Trump has been trying to destroy
the Affordable Care Act because it was passed under his
predecessor, Barack Obama. His latest gambit has been to block any
extension of the subsidies that Americans need to be able to
afford health insurance under the ACA. (The fight over this issue
resulted in the longest government shutdown in history.) Without
those subsidies, the typical American will be paying 30 to 100
percent more for health insurance this year than last — which is
already driving many people out of the ACA marketplace and forcing
them to live without health insurance at all.
Extending ACA subsidies is necessary but not sufficient. A real
affordability agenda would make Medicare available to all
Americans. This will bring down health-care costs for everyone,
because Medicare is cheaper and more efficient than for-profit
health insurance.
6. Make housing more affordable. Last Wednesday, Trump
called for a ban on institutional investors buying single-family
housing. I suppose it's nice that he's finally gotten around
to this, but I'll believe it when he actually signs the
legislation.
A real affordability agenda would:
- Ban Wall Street firms from buying up housing,
- Crack down on corporate landlords that collude to jack up rent
prices,
- Get rid of zoning laws that make it harder to build homes, and
- Increase funding to boost the construction of housing in cities
that need it most.
7. Make child care and elder care more affordable. The
costs of child care take a third of the incomes of parents with
young children, on average. The costs of elder care can be even
higher for working people with elderly parents. Both are essential
for working families. An affordability agenda would include a
universal child-care program for parents and boost funding for
caregivers of aging parents.
8. Give Americans paid leave. Here again, the goal of fat
corporate profits and high share prices collides with what
American workers need. Trump consistently opts for the former and
argues that the nation "can't afford" paid family leave.
Baloney! We're the richest country in the world. Every other
advanced nation provides paid leave. Working Americans need it. We
should provide it, too.
9. Stop Big Finance from siphoning off people’s incomes.
Trump has deregulated big banks and allowed them to charge up to
30 percent interest on credit cards. (The banks love it because
credit cards provide them with four times the return of any other
line of business.) Trump has gotten rid of the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, which stopped other sleazy financial practices.
And he’s allowed more consolidation of big financial institutions,
which means even less competition, higher prices, and shadier
deals. (His Justice Department recently approved the merger of
Capital One and Discover, which will pile even more debt on
low-income consumers.) The captains of Wall Street have never had
it so good. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon made $770-Million last year.
But average working people are being shafted.
A real affordability agenda would:
- Cap credit-card interest rates at 5%,
- Stop the banks from charging late fees on unsuspecting consumers
(Trump's OMB director, Russ Vought, withdrew the late fee rule in
April), and
- Bust up the biggest banks, whose market power is allowing them
to charge absurdly-high interest rates on all borrowing.
10. Raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans and corporations.
Besides tariffs, Trump’s economic policy has cut taxes mainly on
wealthy individuals and big corporations. He’s imbibed the
“trickle-down” Kool-Aid that assumes tax cuts at the top make
everyone better off.
The reality - as we’ve learned since Trump’s first tax cut
mostly benefiting the wealthy and big corporations (as we should
have learned from Ronald Reagan’s and George W. Bush’s
trickle-down tax cuts also mainly benefiting the rich and big
corporations) - is that nothing trickles down.
Trickle-down economics is a cruel sham. The cumulative effects of
all these tax cuts has been to make America’s rich far richer (now
owning a record share of the nation’s wealth) and big corporations
far more profitable (corporate profits are also near record
levels), while dramatically enlarging the national debt.
And what do we get with a bigger debt? More inflation, which makes
everything less affordable. Again, Trump has it ass-backward. It’s
time we ended the trickle-down hoax once and for all. Besides,
it’s only fair that the super-rich pay more in taxes so that the
rest of America can afford what Americans need: housing, health
care, child care and elder care. And by the way, even after paying
more in taxes, the rich will still be richer than they've ever
been, and giant corporations will still be exceedingly profitable.
These 10 steps are crucial for making America affordable
again. Don’t fall for Trump’s ass-backward agenda, which will
only make the rich richer and big corporations more
profitable. You and I and everyone who wants to lower
the cost of living for Americans should back the real
affordability agenda.
[Robert Reich beat me to it: "Please share this with any
Democrat or independent (hell, share it with any Republican)
interested in running for office and improving Americans'
standard of living.]
Deepa Shivaram: Trump's
Economic Speech Veers Off-Topic As He Takes Aim At Biden And
Powell. (NPR News, updated January 13, 2026)
Yesterday at the Detroit Economic Club, President Trump gave a
grievance-laden speech that touched on what he labeled "a
resurgent American economy" - but meandered
into many different topics including criticism of former
President Joe Biden, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell,
Minnesota's Somali population and Minneapolis protesters.
"We have quickly gone from the worst numbers on record to the best
and strongest numbers and an economy that is far ahead", Trump
said from the Detroit Economic Club.
The speech, which comes amid polling showing his handling of the
economy at a historic low, lasted just more than an hour. He
touted plans to crack down on fraud, freeze federal payments to
states with sanctuary cities and cap credit card fees at 10% for a
year. He also teased further proposals to come on health care and
housing.
"It's unfair," Trump said in Detroit on credit card interest
rates. "The rates are too high to provide further relief to
hardworking Americans."
But Trump spent much of his time blaming Biden for inflation rates
and criticized the fed chair, Powell, whom the Justice Department
is targeting in a new investigation. Trump told NBC News on Sunday
he had nothing to do with the probe, but he has been criticizing
Powell for months for not lowering interest rates and has been
threatening to fire him.
In his remarks, Trump referred to Powell as "that jerk" and said
he would "be gone soon."
Michigan was Trump's first domestic trip since a slew of
international news – capturing Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro;
threatening military action against Iran after rising protests;
threatening to seize Greenland; trying to move forward in the Gaza
peace deal; ongoing negotiations to end the Russia-Ukraine war –
has been the president's main focus for weeks.
But in the U.S., even a majority of the president's own supporters
remain increasingly concerned about high costs and affordability.
It's an issue that was critical for Democrats' successes in the
2025 elections in Virginia and New Jersey and expected to remain
top of mind for midterm elections later this year.
Last month, Trump's approval rating on the economy hit a new low
of 36%, according to a NPR/PBS/Marist poll. The poll showed voters
feel like they are struggling to make ends meet and are most
concerned about high costs.
The president previously addressed his economic agenda in an Oval
Office speech and said his administration was "making progress" on
lowering costs but "it's not done yet."
Julie Tsirkin: Trump
Threatened GOP Senators Who Voted To Allow Congress
To Vote On The War Powers Resolution, In "Angry"
Calls. (NBC News, Jan. 11, 2026)
On January 8, hours after the Senate voted to advance the War
Powers Resolution rebuking the White House's current and
future actions in Venezuela, President Donald Trump placed
"angry" calls to some of the five Republicans who crossed the
aisle, according to people with knowledge of the
calls. Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska),
Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Todd
Young (R-Ind.), voted with Democrats to require the
administration to get congressional approval for future
military action in Venezuela.
Thursday's vote was a procedural motion; it advances the
legislation to a full Senate vote that will require a simple
majority.
Soon after the vote, Trump threatened each senator with primary
challenges, vowing to unseat them, the people said. Two people
describe the calls as "direct but cordial". But in at least
Collins' case, Trump sharply criticized her and raised his voice,
according to a person familiar with the exchange. Collins, a
six-term senator who is up for re-election this year, hasn't
formally announced her political plans.
On Truth Social after Thursday's vote, Trump said that all
five senators "should never be elected to office again". "This
Vote greatly hampers American Self Defense and National
Security, impeding the President's Authority as Commander in
Chief", he wrote. "In any event, and despite
their 'stupidity', the War Powers Act is Unconstitutional,
totally violating Article II of the Constitution, as all
Presidents, and their Departments of Justice, have determined
before me."
NBC News spoke to some of the senators in the group, including
Hawley and Paul, who praised Trump. "I love the president. I think
he's doing a great job", Hawley said, who forecast that he could
change his vote when the Senate takes up final passage this
week.
The White House hasn't responded to a request for comment and
hasn't confirmed the calls.
[The original subject said, "who voted for". WORSE, they
only voted to ALLOW CONGRESS TO VOTE for it! Trump continues
to play Dictator, ignoring our Constitution's checks and
balances. The fact that ONLY five GOP Senators acted
FOR the Constitution, Congress and WE, THE PEOPLE
speaks volumes.]
Jimmy Kimmel Live: Rachel
Maddow On Trump Being Extremely Unpopular, ICE Shooting In
Minneapolis & Peaceful Protests. (12-min.
YouTube video; The Jimmy Kimmel Show, January 9, 2026)
Rachel talks about Jimmy's parents being fans, the Trump
presidency not offering much to people right now, his
unpopularity, the positive things that come from peaceful
protests, the woman who was shot and killed by ICE in Minneapolis,
getting her start in morning radio, attending Dick Cheney's
funeral, and her podcast Burn Order.
Zolan Kanno-Youngs: We
Pressed Trump On His Conclusion About The ICE Shooting.
Here's What He Said. The Exchange Was A Glimpse Into The
President's Reflexive Defense Of His Federal Crackdown On
Immigration. (1-min. video; New York
Times, January 8, 2026)
During an interview with The New York Times, President Trump said
that a woman who was shot by federal agents in Minnesota "behaved
horribly" and ran an agent over. Analysis by The New York Times
showed the motorist was driving away from - not toward
- a federal officer when he opened fire.
Brian Tyler Cohen with Mark Elias: Democracy Watch episode 446:
Justice
Department Issues "BOMBSHELL" Epstein Announcement!
(14-min. YouTube video; YouTube, January 7, 2026)
Justice Department reveals it's released LESS THAN 1% of
Epstein files!
David Corn: The
Erasure Of January 6 - Five Years Later, MAGA-World Is Still
Engaging In Its Orwellian Rewriting Of History.
(photos, links - including to the Trump-stalled 255-page
December 17th deposition by Jack Smith, about the
Trump-suppressed report analyzing January 6, 2021's
Trump-inspired and Trump-enabled MAGA attack on our U.S.
Capitol in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election;
Mother Jones, January 6, 2026)
[This is an important article; if you don't have time to read it all
now, you can skip down to its last 3 paragraphs by searching for
three dashes (---). After you have read it all, you might
read the finally-available 255-page official Justice Dept.-ordered
deposition - and save YOUR copy of it for sharing with (and BY)
current and future friends and relatives.]
In 1984, George Orwell observed that a fascist
state relies upon its ability to control - or obliterate -
memory. As Winston Smith, the ill-fated protagonist,
ponders the Party's ability to manipulate reality and history,
Orwell writes, "Everything faded into mist. The past was
erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth."
Another passage in the novel describes the Party's relentless
effort to construct the dominant narrative: "Every
record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been
rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and
street and building has been renamed, every date has been
altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by
minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless
present in which the Party is always right."
Sound familiar? It's been five years since a mob of
thousands of Donald Trump supporters - which included Christian
nationalists, white supremacists, neo-Nazis, Confederate flag
wavers, militia members, and other extremists - assaulted the
U.S. Capitol to try to halt the peaceful transfer of power from
an outgoing president to an incoming president. The
basic facts are well-established:
- Trump refused to accept legitimate election results.
- He falsely claimed he had won the 2020 contest and
spread baseless lies and conspiracy theories about the
election.
- He spent weeks scheming to overturn the election and
remain in power.
- Promoting these falsehoods, he incited that
insurrectionist attack on Congress in which more than
140 law-enforcement officers were injured.
- While the melee was occurring, he abandoned his duty to
defend the Constitution and waited 187 minutes
before calling on his brown-shirts to leave the Capitol.
This is all undeniable. Yet Trump and his cult refuse to
accept these fundamentals. Like the Party in Orwell's
dystopia:
- Trump and the Republicans have sought to rewrite history and
erase the stain of Trump's profound betrayal of America.
- He pardoned the violent marauders, and
- his henchmen in charge of the FBI and Justice
Department have fired agents and prosecutors who participated
in the investigation and prosecution of these thugs.
- And Trump's MAGA legions mounted a disinformation campaign
that advanced various conspiracy theories ("The FBI
did it! Antifa did it!") to absolve Trump and his thugs.
- More important, an entire political party and
tens-of-millions of American voters memory-holed Trump's war
on American democracy and his embrace of political violence.
What is perhaps the gravest transgression ever committed by a
U.S. president has been air-brushed out of the picture
and the perp allowed (by a majority of voters) to
return to the scene of the crime. This is one of the most
worrisome turns in American history. If our democracy cannot
protect itself from such peril and repel such a dangerous threat,
can it survive?
Trump's triumph over reality was made clear this past
week. On New Year's Eve - one of the deadest times
for the news cycle - the Republicans on the House
Judiciary Committee released the closed-doors testimony it had
received before two weeks from Jack Smith, the special
counsel who led the investigations that indicted Trump for
conspiring to overturn the 2020 election and for allegedly swiping
highly-sensitive White House documents. Both cases ended after
Trump won the election in November. (Under Justice Department
policy, a sitting president cannot be prosecuted for federal
crimes.)
Smith insisted on a public appearance, apparently
knowing he had the goods on Trump. The Republicans said no,
and questioned him in a private session - all the
better for controlling the narrative. The fact that they made public
the transcript on a holiday night tells you what you need to
know about who got the best of whom.
Smith, as you know, has been repeatedly denounced by
Trump as "a lunatic who waged witch hunts and investigated
hoaxes generated by his fellow Deep Staters, the Democrats, and
the media". And Republicans hauled Smith in as part of
their never-ending crusade to find (or concoct) evidence
to bolster Trump's paranoid fantasies and conspiracy theories
- and to buttress their hyperbolic charge that Trump and
Republicans have been the victims of what they call the
"weaponization of government".
The 255-page transcript is an important document that every
citizen should read. (I know, I'm being fanciful.) Smith
ran circles around the GOP committee members and their staff. "Our
investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the
results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer
of power", Smith said at the start. He added, "Our
investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that
President Trump willfully retained highly-classified documents
after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his
social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then
repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued
retention of those documents."
Smith patiently explained how Trump's (alleged) crime related to
January 6: "January 6th was an attack on the structure of our
democracy in which over 140 heroic law-enforcement
officers were assaulted. Over 160 individuals later pled
guilty to assaulting police that day. Exploiting
that violence, President Trump and his associates tried to
call Members of Congress in furtherance of their criminal
scheme, urging them to further delay certification of
the 2020 election."
This is an accusation that sums up Trump's perfidy: He tried
to take advantage of this spasm of cop-beating violence to
illegally remain in office. That foul deed should have
disqualified Trump from ever holding any position of authority.
Yet…
A key exchange occurred when a Republican staffer (whose name is
redacted in the transcript) asked, "The President's statements
that he believed the election was rife with fraud, those certainly
are statements that are protected by the First Amendment,
correct?" This has been a central contention of the Trump
cult: You cannot prosecute Trump for stating his opinion that the
election was rigged against him. But Smith fired back: "Absolutely
not. If [these false statements] are made to target a lawful
government function and they are made with knowing falsity, no,
they are not." Statements made to promote a fraud
are not protected by the First Amendment.
Later on in his testimony, Smith remarked that the elections
case against Trump was much like an "affinity fraud" -
that's when, he said, "you try to gain someone's trust,
get them to trust you as a general matter, and then you
rip them off, you defraud them." Trump, he told the
committee, “had people…who had built up trust in him, including
people in his own party, and he preyed on that." And once
again, Smith reiterated, fraud is not covered by the First
Amendment.
This Republican staffer took another shot at it and said, "There's a
long history of candidates speaking out about they believe there's
been fraud [in an election]…I think you would agree that those types
of statements are sort of at the core of the First Amendment rights
of a Presidential candidate, right?"
Not at all, Smith replied: "There is no historical
analog for what President Trump did in this case. As we said
in the indictment, he was free to say that he thought he
won the election. He was even free to say falsely that he
won the election. But what he was not free to do
was violate federal law and use knowingly-false
statements about election fraud to target a lawful government
function. That he was not allowed to do. And that
differentiates this case from any past history."
The Republicans kept trying to mount a theoretical defense for
Trump. This staffer pointed out that during the hullabaloo over the
2020 election, Trump was receiving information on supposed
election fraud from Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark,
and Sidney Powell, and he asked, wasn't Trump just "regurgitating
what these people have told him?"
Smith had a sharp retort: "No. And, in fact, one of
the strengths of our case and why we felt we had such strong proof
is all witnesses were not going to be political
enemies of the President. They were going to be
political allies. We had numerous witnesses who would
say, 'I voted for President Trump. I campaigned for President Trump.
I wanted him to win.' The speaker of the house in Arizona. The
speaker of the house in Michigan. We had an elector in Pennsylvania,
who is a former Congressman who was going to be an elector for
President Trump, who said that what they were trying to
do was an attempt to overthrow the government - and illegal.
Our case was built on, frankly, Republicans who put their
allegiance to the country before the party."
Call 911. There was a murder in this Capitol Hill office, as Smith
decimated the various lines of defense Trump's handmaids
hurled at him. He forcibly denied Trump's indictments were
political acts or that his office had been “weaponized".
In an exchange with Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), he
explained the importance of his investigation:
Jayapal: What happens if there is election interference
and the people who are responsible for that are not held
accountable?
Smith: It becomes the new norm, and that becomes how we
conduct elections.
Jayapal: And so the toll on our democracy, if you had
to describe that, what would that be?
Smith: Catastrophic.
The Smith transcript generated headlines…for a day. Like most
everything else in our information hypersphere, this
story did not have much staying power. Trump's attempt to
blow up the constitutional order has become old news.
Ho-hum. He got away with this allegedly criminal act because he
won the election. His pardons of the violent criminals who
attacked hundreds of cops is just one item on a long list of
outrages that quickly come and go. Many Americans, it seems,
couldn't hold on to a clear memory of January 6 for even a few
years—or couldn’t be bothered to.
A high-profile public appearance in which Smith
vigorously presented the case against Trump might not at this
point change the overall public perception of Trump's
attempted power grab and the violent raid he triggered. But that
would have drawn more attention and served the truth. Which
is why Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the chair of the
committee, and his fellow Republicans made damn sure that did
not happen.
---
Today is the fifth anniversary of January 6 - a shameful
day in American history. And in the last election, the
nation - or about half of its voters - welcomed
back into the house the arsonist who tried to burn it down.
The past 10 years have sadly showed us that a wannabe
authoritarian in the United States can succeed in denying
reality and wiping away history. Trump did that with the
Russian attack on the 2016 election, which he aided and
abetted by echoing Vladimir Putin's false claims that Moscow
had not intervened and by insisting ad nauseum that it was a hoax.
And he has done the same with January 6, hailing it a
"day of love" and "a beautiful day" and calling the rioters
"great patriots".
This demonstrates how susceptible people can be to what the
Party did in 1984: Erase the past (even the
most recent past) and then erase the erasure.
Trump is back in the White House, pushing his agenda of
authoritarianism far beyond what he could only dream of
during his first term. Future historians - if there is
history in the future - will wonder about much in this era. But what
might puzzle them the most is how the man who nearly
annihilated our constitutional republic was able to worm
his way back into the presidency. Gore Vidal once
referred to the nation as the "United States of Amnesia".
On this dark anniversary, it's good to remember that Trump is
in power today because there's been too much forgetting.
[In addition to Trumputin-and-friends belittling and stifling this Justice
Department report as described, it's now obvious that Trumputin-and-friends
already had secret knowledge of his very-diverting attack on
Venezuela, only two nights after they released their
redacted version.]
Thom Hartmann: This
Brutal Doctrine Explains What Trump's Done To America - And
What's Coming Next. (Raw Story, January 6, 2026)
When Donald Trump and the buffoons who surround him invaded
Venezuela and captured Nicolás Maduro, they broke with almost a
century of American-led respect for the international rule of
law and, instead, nakedly embraced the Putin Doctrine.
There was a brief, shining moment when Russia was a democracy. I
visited there at the time. Starting with Mikhail Gorbachev and
lasting about a decade, Russia embraced the ideals of the
European Enlightenment, which itself was inspired by the
North American colonists' contact with Native American
tribes who had been practicing democracy for millennia.
Then Vladimir Putin came along, began suing media outlets and
large law firms into bankruptcy so his oligarch buddies could
take them over, packed the courts and rigged the elections, and
finally outlawed dissent, calling dissenters "the enemy
within" and "domestic terrorists".
ALSO READ: ‘Destined to repeat’: J6 documentary's stark warning
as America tries to forget
Instead of power flowing from the people up, it began to
flow from Putin down, turning the Russian democracy into an
autocracy, functionally a dictatorship with the patina of
democracy because they still have elections.
Putin, via an oligarch named Oleg Deripaska, gave a man named Paul
Manafort $10-Million in 2005 to install a Putin-friendly
president (Viktor Yanukovych) in Ukraine as the first
step to essentially turning that country into a vassal state,
the way they'd already done with Belarus, Chechnya, Georgia,
Transnistria, Syria, and Kazakhstan.
When, in 2014, the Ukrainian people threw out Yanukovych
and voted for democracy, Putin invaded and seized
Crimea, one of the most-strategically-important parts of the
country (and where my daughter went to college), a
preface to his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine proper.
With this was born the Putin Doctrine:
1. Russia's policy decisions, both foreign and domestic, are
dictated by Putin's whims, not by the will of parliament (the Duma),
or what's best for the country or its people. He protects and
enriches his family and friends while punishing his enemies.
2. The rule of law internationally is irrelevant to the new Russian
state; instead, "might makes right". If another country has
something you want, or you don't like the way it's being run, just
invade, or send millions of bots and internet trolls via social
media to disrupt its society and politics (see: Brexit and Trump
2016).
3. The world is now multipolar, with the “great powers” of Russia,
China, and the United States having final say in political and
military activity in their regions regardless of objections from
local governments. Russia will control Eurasia and eventually all of
Europe; China will control Asia and eventually Taiwan, Japan, and
South Korea; and the US will be the ultimate power in the Americas,
both North, South, and Central.
Manafort, meanwhile, came back to America and ran Trump’s 2016
presidential campaign for "free", while shuttling insider political
information for Russian intelligence to exploit with social-media
trolls and paid podcasters.
While there have been times in America's past when we've flirted
with this sort of world-view, it's never been made official US
policy. Even when we've attacked other resource-rich countries,
we've at least provided an excuse grounded in "making the world safe
and advancing democracy".
That's because the United States, both internationally and
domestically, used to stand for the principles of the European
Enlightenment. They included the idea that:
- democracy was the natural state of humanity, ordained by what
Thomas Jefferson called "Nature's God";
- that power would be diffused across three co-equal government
branches; and
- that the public good would take precedence over the desires of the
president’s or politicians’ friends.
The Putin doctrine - fully adopted by Trump and his lickspittles
with his media lawsuits, the invasion of Venezuela, and his National
Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7) that identifies
Democrats and anti-ICE protestors as potential domestic terrorists -
tears all that down.
Trump's adoption of the Putin Doctrine ignores our
history of democracy at home and the promotion of democracy abroad,
saying instead that whoever has the stronger military rules the
region. It abandons the "rules-based order" that the
United Nations proclaimed in the 1950s - which has prevented
another world war for 81 years - and says instead that, if
you can successfully capture the head of a foreign state (no
matter how good or bad he or she may be), you should simply go
ahead and do it.
Adolf Hitler was following his own version of the Putin
Doctrine when he invaded Czechoslovakia and then Poland,
kicking off World War II. The oligarchs of the Old South were
following it when their Confederate Army commenced the
bombardment of Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina, on April
12, 1861. And now Trump has made America officially embrace
it.
Our Founders never envisaged a future where an entire
political party would be captured by a small group of oligarchs,
politically-led by a demagogue, who would then abandon the
ideals expressed in the Declaration and the Constitution.
As Dan Sisson and I document in "The American Revolution of
1800: How Jefferson Rescued Democracy from Tyranny and Faction",
America's Founders considered the demagogue part of the equation,
but thought Congress and the Courts would protect the nation; they
never imagined that six corrupt Supreme Court justices
would rewrite the Constitution to give a president
immunity for all crimes committed in the Oval Office,
after making legalized political bribery the official policy
of the country.
As Christopher Armitage points out, about the only
government institutions that are trying to preserve democracy in
America now are the Blue states. And they have
considerable power, because Trump can't pardon
state-based prosecutions even when they're against
officials in his own federal government.
Now that the Trump regime:
- has seized almost-complete control of the GOP,
- has its friends in charge of most of our major media and law
firms,
- has corrupted our federal justice system,
- has deployed masked secret police across the country, and
- is challenging voters' rights at multiple levels,
America needs the Blue states to get more coordinated, to push
back against MAGA's Putin-like behaviors in Red states.
Each of us who lives in a Blue state has an obligation to reach
out to our state's politicians and demand that they stand up to
this corrupt, illegitimate regime. As Armitage notes,
we must push them to:
- Prosecute federal officials who commit assault, kidnapping, or
civil rights violations in your state.
- Build public revenue streams that don't depend on federal funding.
- Expand state safety nets to catch the people federal cuts will
drop.
- Demonstrate what good governance looks like.
The differences between the quality of life in oligarch-run
Red states and Democratic-run Blue states have become so
conspicuous that it's amazing they're not more-widely known:
- Blue states account for about 71% of America’s GDP, whereas
Trump-supporting Red states only produce 29% of our income and
wealth.
- The median family income in Blue states is $74,243. In Red states
it's $63,553. Individual states highlight the disparity: New
Jersey's median income is $89,703, while Mississippi's is $49,111.
- Counties that voted for Biden in 2020 are better educated, with
36% of their population having some college education compared to
Trump's counties at 25%.
- Residents of Blue states live 2.2 years longer, on average, than
residents of Red states.
Republican/oligarch-controlled Red states, almost across
the board, have higher rates of:
- Spousal abuse
- Obesity
- Smoking
- Teen pregnancy
- Sexually-transmitted diseases
- Abortion (at least before Dobbs; now it would be "forced births")
- Bankruptcies and poverty
- Homicide and suicide
- Infant mortality
- Maternal mortality
- Forcible rape
- Robbery and aggravated assault
- Dropouts from high school
- Divorce
- Contaminated air and water
- Opiate addiction and deaths
- Unskilled workers
- Parasitic infections
- Income and wealth inequality
- Covid deaths and unvaccinated people
- Federal subsidies to states (“Red State Welfare”)
- People on welfare
- Child poverty
- Homelessness
- Spousal murder
- Unemployment
- Deaths from auto accidents
- People living on disability
- Gun deaths
America stands at a crossroads, as the Trump regime moves us
closer every day to replacing our democracy altogether with a
Russia-like federal autocracy.
There's no Abraham Lincoln in charge of our government, so it
falls to us and our Blue states to enforce the rule of law,
stand up for democracy, and show the skeptics and
"dark-enlightenment" billionaire Tech Bros that the will of
the people still matters here.
That doesn't require waiting for the election this Fall or in
2028; it just needs the governors and administrations of the
Blue states to stand up against Trump's embrace of the
Putin Doctrine and preserve what's left of our
democratic traditions.
Ballotpedia has a good site at <https://ballotpedia.org/States#State_governments>,
where you can drill down to the contact information for
your state's elected officials to let them know you
want them to push back hard.
Good luck: The fate and future of the American Experiment
may well rest in your hands.
[Well said! And that's why we call him Trumputin.]
Robert Davis/Raw Story: Republicans
Officially Rebuke Trump's Efforts To Change Kennedy Center's
Name. (MSN News, January 5, 2026)
Republicans put one of President Donald Trump's most
significant goals on ice today, by refusing to change
the John F. Kennedy Center's name officially.
Trump has been trying for months to rebrand the Kennedy
Center as the "Trump-Kennedy Center", a move
that has caused a swarm of musicians to boycott the acclaimed
concert hall. He has affixed his name to the building's
exterior, although officially changing the name requires
an act of Congress because the center was created by federal law.
Also Read: America's most dangerous enemy sits at its very heart
Republicans had a chance to make that change in the most
recent appropriations bill for the Department of the Interior,
which has some say in the center's operations. However,
Republicans rebuffed Trump by leaving out any provisions that
would officially change the name, Matt Rice, Washington
correspondent for The New York Sun, reported today. The move
happened at a time when Trump's base had fractured over several
recent scandals.
The Trump Report/Fergus Macphee, with Scott Lucas:
It's Time To Take Trump's Global Threats Seriously.
(35-min. video; Times Radio, January 5, 2026)
Professor of International Politics Scott Lucas tells Times
Radio's Fergus Macphee why interim Venezuelan leader
Delcy Rodriguez, and Donald Trump's threat towards her
matter. They also discuss whether the U.S. President's
ambitions will stop with Venezuela, and how other
world leaders could respond.
The Associated Press: Holocaust-Survivor
Eva Schloss, The Step-Sister Of Anne Frank, Dies At 96.
(photo, podcast, links; NPR News, January 5, 2026)
LONDON - Auschwitz survivor Eva Schloss, the step-sister of
teenage-diarist Anne Frank and a tireless educator about the
horrors of the Holocaust, has died. She was 96.
The Anne Frank Trust UK, of which Schloss was honorary
president, said she died Saturday in London, where she lived.
Britain's King Charles III said he was "privileged and proud" to
have known Schloss, who co-founded the charitable trust to help
young people challenge prejudice. "The horrors that she
endured as a young woman are impossible to comprehend and yet she
devoted the rest of her life to overcoming hatred and
prejudice, promoting kindness, courage, understanding and
resilience through her tireless work for the Anne
Frank Trust UK and for Holocaust education across the world",
the king said.
[May her - and her step-sister's - good work live on, and help to
civilize our troubled "civilization".]
Trump Attacks Venezuela:
U.N.
Warns That U.S. Strikes in Venezuela May Violate
International Law, Risk Wider Instability. | AC1G
(8-min. YouTube video; DRM News, January 5, 2026)
UN Under-Secretary-General Rosemary DiCarlo warned the UN
Security Council that U.S. strikes in Venezuela and
the capture of Nicolás Maduro risk violating
international law and destabilising the region. Speaking
on behalf of Secretary-General António Guterres, she urged respect
for the UN Charter and a peaceful democratic path forward.
Jeffrey
Sachs Blasts U.S. Power Grab Over Venezuela and Maduro
Capture, at Historic U.N. Meeting. | AC1G
(9-min. YouTube video; DRM News, January 5, 2026)
Economist and UN-adviser Jeffrey Sachs delivered
blistering remarks at an emergency UN Security Council meeting,
condemning U.S. strikes on Venezuela and the capture of Nicolás
Maduro and his wife. Sachs warned of U.S. "hegemonic power
grabs", urging the Council to defend the UN Charter and
international law.
Jaclyn Diaz and Jasmine Garsd: Maduro
And Wife Plead Not Guilty To Narco-Terrorism Charges.
(photos, podcast; NPR Breaking News, updated January 5, 2026)
Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro and his wife, politician and attorney
Cilia Flores, made their first court appearance at a federal court
in New York City this (Monday) afternoon, when they both pleaded not
guilty to all charges.
Maduro is facing charges of narco-terrorism conspiracy,
cocaine-importation conspiracy and weapons charges. Flores and other
senior Venezuelan officials, including Maduro's son, are also facing
charges.
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein is overseeing the
proceedings. Monday's hearing lasted less than an hour, with both
Maduro and Flores submitting their pleas.
It's one of the first times the now-former head of the Venezuelan
state has been seen publicly since the U.S. attacked Caracas,
captured Maduro and his wife, and brought them to the U.S. over the
weekend to face charges.
Maduro greeted people in the courtroom with "Happy New Year" as he
entered. During the proceedings, he introduced himself as the
president of Venezuela as well as a prisoner of war. Flores
introduced herself as first lady of Venezuela. Her right eye
appeared swollen and her forehead was bandaged in what may be
injuries sustained during the U.S. military operation. Maduro's
defense requested X-rays and medical attention for what they said
may be a broken or bruised rib, which they say was sustained during
the military operation.
A heckler stood up in court to say, "You will pay in the name of the
Venezuelan people." Maduro turned to face him and responded, "I am a
man of God."
Outside the courtroom, crowds gathered and emotions were high.
Protesters played drums and sang the Venezuelan national anthem.
Some who opposed the Trump administration's actions demanded the
U.S. release Maduro. Others decried harsh conditions for Venezuelans
under Maduro.
Maduro and Flores were captured in their Caracas compound in a
surprise U.S. military operation Saturday. The same day, the U.S.
Justice Department released a 25-page indictment that accuses Maduro
and his allies of importing thousands of tons of cocaine into the
U.S. with protection from Venezuelan law enforcement. It alleges
Maduro provided drug traffickers with diplomatic passports and
partnered with drug cartels to send cocaine to the U.S. via points
in the Caribbean and Central America. The indictment claims Maduro
began drug trafficking into the U.S. as early as 1999.
In a post on X this past weekend, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote
that Maduro and his wife "will soon face the full wrath of American
justice on American soil in American courts."
Maduro is being represented by Barry J. Pollack, a leading trial
attorney in the U.S. whose high-profile clients include Julian
Assange and Enron executives. Pollack didn't immediately respond to
a request for comment.
Flores is being defended by Mark Donnelly, a Houston-based attorney
who specializes in white-collar criminal defense. In a statement
sent to NPR Donnelly said, "Our client is in good spirits. We look
forward to reviewing and challenging the evidence the government
has. While we would love to present our side now, we will wait to do
so in court at the appropriate time. The first lady is aware that
there is a long road ahead and is prepared."
The next court date is March 17th. If convicted, Maduro
and his wife could face life in prison.
Brian Tyler Cohen, with Pod
Save The World co-hosts (served on President
Obama's ??) Tommy Vietor and Ben Rhodes: No Lie
episode 301: Trump Dealt BAD NEWS After Venezuela Invasion. (47-min.
YouTube video; YouTube, January 4, 2026)
Trump plunges the United States into a new regime-change war
in Venezuela to start off the new year.
[Another excellent analysis of Trump's craziest and most-risky
escalation yet. Are Congressional Republicans about to stop
supporting Trumputin and his cronies?]
NEW: David Feldman: Trump
Says He'll Run Venezuela. Here's Why He's NUTS! (61-min.
YouTube video; The
Mop-Up, January 4, 2026)
Pod Save The World: Breaking:
Trump Invades Venezuela. (51-min. podcast;
Crooked.com, January 3, 2026)
Gabriel Rubin: U.S.
Raid On Venezuela Threatens New Global Ruptures.
(Reuters, updated January 3, 2026)
The United States has long waged deadly interventions among
its neighbors in the Western Hemisphere. Its latest, this
morning's shock raid on Venezuela and the seizure of autocratic
ruler Nicolás Maduro, is particularly brash.
The country is already in a state of near-collapse, its
economic output falling by roughly 70% since 2013. Yet the
Trump administration's move to decapitate its leadership risks
further worsening a crisis that has already displaced 8-million
refugees, perhaps magnifying it by destabilizing ally Cuba.
It is an ominous harbinger of further jockeying by global
superpowers, promising yet more conflict.
Annie Paul: Ricardo
(@Ric_RTP): PETRODOLLARS? The Capture Of Venezuela.
(repost from X (eX-Twitter); January 3, 2026)
- Annie says: This seems to me the most-plausible
explanation for the U.S. interference in Venezuela…what a way to
enter 2026. SMH.
- Ricardo (@Ric_RTP) is the author of this important
article.
- D&J thank Ricardo for the article, and Annie for
re-posting it to a trusted site on Substack. And now, the start of
the article:
PETRODOLLARS? The Capture Of Venezuela.
The real reason the U.S. is invading Venezuela goes back to a
deal Henry Kissinger made with Saudi Arabia in 1974. And
I'm going to explain why this is actually about the SURVIVAL of
the U.S. dollar itself. Not drugs. Not terrorism. Not
"democracy". This is about the petrodollar system that
has kept America the dominant economic power for 50 years. And
Venezuela just threatened to end it.
Here's what really just happened:
Venezuela has 303-billion barrels of proven oil reserves. The
largest on Earth. More than Saudi Arabia. 20% of the entire
World's oil.
But here's the part that matters:
Venezuela was actively selling that oil in Chinese yuan.
Not dollars. In 2018, Venezuela announced it would "free
itself from the dollar". They started accepting yuan, euros, rubles,
anything BUT dollars for oil. They were petitioning to join BRICS.
They were building direct payment channels with China that bypass
SWIFT entirely. And they were sitting on enough oil to fund
de-dollarization for decades.
Why does this matter?
Because the entire American financial system is built on
one thing: the petrodollar.
[Read the rest of Ricardo's important article - at Annie's
website (above)!]
PBS News Weekend: Maduro
Captured. (first 13-min. of 27-min.
YouTube video; PBS.org, January 3, 2026)
Trump says the U.S. will indefinitely run the country of Venezuela
after the military's capture of Nicolás Maduro. Some
Venezuelans celebrate the U.S. operation, while others worry about
what comes next.
[Others? Many Venezuelans and others must be doing both!]
David Frum Show/Bonus Episode: Anne
Applebaum: How Is Trump Planning to "Run" Venezuela?
(29-min. YouTube video; MS Now, January 3, 2026)
David Frum is joined by The Atlantic's Anne Applebaum
to react to the news of the American raid and capture of
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Heather Cox Richardson: How The U.S.
Taking Out Maduro Matters To The World. (33-min.
YouTube video; HCR YouTube, January 3, 2026)
Rachel Maddow: Her Early
Reaction To President Donald Trump's Strike On Venezuela And
Capture Of Venezuelan President Maduro. (16-min.
YouTube video; MS Now, January 3, 2026)
Philip Wegmann: Trump's
Venezuela Gamble And America's Shifting National-Security
Strategy. (RealClear Politics, January 3, 2026)
President Donald Trump has embarked on his own
regime-change mission. And this time the United States intends to
keep the oil.
American Special Operations Forces captured Nicolás
Maduro in a daring raid, nabbing the Venezuelan leader
from his bed early this (Saturday) morning before sending him north
aboard the USS Iwo Jima to New York, where he will face
criminal charges related to an alleged narco-terrorism conspiracy.
The leftist strongman had ruled the South American state for
more than a decade.
Now Trump will take over. "We're going to run the country
until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious
transition", he told reporters during a Mar-a-Lago press
conference, deputizing Secretary of State Marco Rubio and
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to manage in the interim as "a
team".
Though long a critic of the foreign entanglements that defined
the presidencies of his Republican predecessors, Trump insisted he
could do regime change right. "We'll run it properly. We'll
run it professionally", he said. "We'll have the greatest
oil companies in the world going in."
Trump will not, however, clean house. He claimed Delcy
Rodríguez, a Maduro loyalist and the current Venezuelan vice
president, was already willing to work with the United States to
remake the country. He said it would be "very tough" for opposition
leader María Corina Machado to assume power. Just hours
after perhaps the most-consequential decision of his tenure, the
once-ostensibly-isolationist president was suddenly and remarkably
open-ended in his commitment to rebuild a nation thousands of
miles away from his own. Of a potential American
occupation force, Trump said, "We are not afraid of boots on
the ground."
While Attorney General Pam Bondi characterized the operation as
"an arrest with military support", Kentucky Rep. Thomas
Massie wondered how that legal characterization applied to
Trump’s promise to take over and run the country. That
question will soon be litigated on Capitol Hill, though Democrats
don't have the numbers, nor Republicans the appetite, to check the
White House.
Trump has offered different condemnations of Maduro at different
times. He first condemned him as being complicit in the
drug trade that brought "poison" to American shores, then
reproached the authoritarian as a puppet of foreign adversaries,
before finally flaying his regime for the nationalization of
American oil producers in the region.
Perhaps a combination of those irritants has inspired Trump's
latest foreign-policy evolution. Once averse to intervention, he
now welcomes the opportunity to rebuild a regime immediately after
he removed its leadership. He remains consistent on at least
one count. After criticizing the Bush administration for not turning
a profit in the War on Terror, Trump seems hell-bent on avoiding
that same mistake. He said that U.S. energy companies would
rebuild the nation as they return to Venezuela and seek new
revenue streams. Any costs incurred would quickly be deferred by
the new oil revenue, or what the president described as "the
money coming out of the ground".
Even if the newly-announced nation-building mission may be something
of a flashback to the invasion and occupation of Iraq, Trump
did not echo language of the War on Terror. He spoke for
nearly an hour [taking dishonest jabs at others and often
repeating himself - after arriving a half-hour late, and
dozing while others spoke]. Not once did the president, or his
assembled people, say the word "democracy".
Trump's
Public Announcement Of His Overnight Sneak-Attack On
Venezuela (93-min. YouTube video, but first
34-min. is an empty podium; PBS News, January 3, 2026)
NEW: Alex Brandon and Bilal Hussein/Associated Press: Trump
Vows To "Rescue" Iran's Protesters. Iran Warns The U.S. To
Stay Out Of it. (NPR News, January 2, 2026)
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - U.S. President Donald Trump and
top Iranian officials exchanged dueling threats today as
widening protests swept across parts of the Islamic Republic,
further escalating tensions between the countries after America
bombed Iranian nuclear sites in June.
At least seven people have been killed so far in violence
surrounding the demonstrations, which were sparked in part by the
collapse of Iran's rial currency but have increasingly seen crowds
chanting anti-government slogans.
The protests, now in their sixth day, have become the biggest in
Iran since 2022, when the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in
police custody triggered nationwide demonstrations. However, the
demonstrations have yet to be countrywide and have not been as
intense as those surrounding the death of Amini - who was detained
over not wearing her hijab, or headscarf, to the liking of
authorities.
Trump initially wrote on his Truth Social platform, warning
Iran that if it "violently kills peaceful protesters", the
United States "will come to their rescue". "We are locked and
loaded and ready to go", Trump wrote, without
elaborating.
Shortly after, Ali Larijani, a former parliament speaker who serves
as the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council,
alleged on the social-platform X that Israel and the U.S.
were stoking the demonstrations. He offered no evidence to support
the allegation, which Iranian officials have repeatedly made during
years of protests sweeping the country. "Trump should know that
intervention by the U.S. in the domestic problem corresponds to
chaos in the entire region and the destruction of the U.S.
interests", Larijani wrote on X - which the Iranian
government blocks. "The people of the U.S. should know that Trump
began the adventurism. They should take care of their own
soldiers."
Georgism
(Wikipedia; posted here January 2, 2026)
"Free trade, free land, free men!" Georgism,
in modern times also called Geoism, and known
historically as the single-tax movement, is an economic ideology holding that
persons should own the value that they produce themselves,
while the economic rent derived from land - including from all natural
resources, the commons,
and urban locations - should belong equally to all members
of society. Developed from the writings of American economist
and social reformer Henry George, the Georgist paradigm seeks solutions
to social and ecological problems based on principles
of land rights and public finance that attempt to integrate
economic
efficiency with social
justice.
Emma Lazarus,
Author Of "The
New Colossus" (original manuscript, images,
links; Wikipedia, posted here January 2, 2026)
Emma Lazarus (July 22, 1849 – November 19, 1887) was an
American author of poetry, prose, and translations, as well as an
activist for Jewish and Georgist causes. She is remembered for
writing the sonnet "The New Colossus", which was inspired
by the Statue of Liberty, in 1883. Its lines appear
inscribed on a bronze plaque, installed in 1903, on the pedestal of
the Statue of Liberty. Lazarus was involved in aiding
refugees to New York who had fled anti-semitic pogroms in eastern
Europe, and she saw a way to express her empathy for those
refugees in terms of the statue.
Heather Cox Richardson: U.S.
Immigration, Ellis Island, The Statue Of Liberty
And More... (Letters from an American, January 1, 2026)
On January 1, 1892, seventeen-year-old Annie Moore walked
down the gangway from the steamship Nevada with her
two brothers Anthony, eleven, and Philip, nine, and into
history as the first person processed through the
newly-opened Ellis Island Immigrant Station. The
establishment of a federal facility for processing immigrants had
been a long time coming. Between 1892 and 1954, when Ellis
Island closed, more than 12-million immigrants would
come through the facility on their journey to the United
States.
Immigrants arrived at Ellis Island after a two-week journey
from Europe. After entering New York Harbor, they sailed by
the Statue of Liberty on Liberty Island,
dedicated just six years before the facility at Ellis Island
opened. A gift to the people of the United States from the people of
France, Lady Liberty stood on a broken chain-and-shackle
that symbolized the abolition of slavery in the U.S., and held
up a torch to the newcomers. She held a tablet that
represented the law. It was engraved with "July IV MDCCLXXVI"
- July 4, 1776, the date of the Declaration of Independence.
In 1965, Ellis Island became part of the Statue
of Liberty National Monument, formalizing its connection
to Lady Liberty and to the poem inscribed
cast and mounted inside the base of the statue in 1903. Emma
Lazarus turned away from the old "Colossus of
Rhodes" - the giant statue of the Greek sun-god Helios
that stood at the entrance to the harbor of the Island of Rhodes
and was one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World
- to offer the world "The New Colossus", a woman, Lady
Liberty, the "Mother of Exiles":
---
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
---
[Much more online, describing what so many immigrants experienced (with
major support from Abraham Lincoln and his Republican Party)
on their first day(s) in America.]
NEW: David Pakman Show: Psychologist
DROPS HAMMER: I Think Trump Had A Stroke. (19-min.
YouTube video; Substack, January 1, 2026)
Dr. John Gartner, former assistant professor at Johns
Hopkins University School of Medicine and founder of Duty
to Warn, joins us to discuss signs of cognitive decline
in Donald Trump's second term.
Ken Klippenstein: This
Insane Post Foreshadows The Year To Come: Why 2026 Is A
Year For The Big, Bold And Brazen. (images;
Substack, January 1, 2026)
On New Year's Eve, the Department of Homeland Security's X
account posted an illustration of a 1960s car parked
on an idyllic beach. The caption (I'm not making this
up) is "America After 100-Million Deportations".
A casual reference to the forcible removal of over a quarter of
the country (coming from the official account of a
cabinet-level department of the U.S. government!) is, of
course, insane. But there's a message behind the madness, as I
quickly realized after looking up some of the latest polling on DHS.
It turns out that DHS's vision of an imagined past resonates
with quite a few people. Recent polling from Gallup
finds that the Department is the only federal agency to
see a significant increase in its job rating in 2025.
But here's the kicker: Gallup also found a huge increase
in Americans' support for immigration (including
among Republicans). So what explains the support for
DHS but not its vision of mass deportation?
Vision is the keyword here. People are sick of the
realistic and the reasonable, because look at where it got us:
houses you can't afford to buy and healthcare you can't afford to
use. A mass immigration bringing back a 1960s-era country isn't
really what Americans want; it's the boldness of the idea that
appeals to people. They want political leaders to think
big. And what's bigger than 100-million?
President Trump seems very aware of this, having taken up the
occasion of the 250th anniversary of the signing of the
Declaration of Independence as an opportunity to impose
his vision of where the country goes from here, with his
typical penchant for grandiosity. He said in his New Year’s address:
"2026 will be a celebration of America like no other, honoring our
nation and all of its glory … Working with states, companies, and
organizations across the country, we will renew the patriotism,
pride, and pioneering spirit of America, and lay the groundwork for
the next 250 years of independence and freedom."
[Democracy, tolerance, honesty and fairness
are conspicuously absent.]
Trump senses people's appetite for vision and is eager to provide
his own. Others in his administration are, too.
Another DHS post yesterday declared, "We will not live
like this anymore" over a meme titled, "AMERICA IN 2025".
It's a play on the old expectations vs. reality meme.
The post says "what we expected" above an image of Jetsons-style
hover cars and a rocket-powered Bass-Pro-Shop pyramid zooming
through a futuristic cityscape (lol); "what we got", it then says,
is an image of urban decay in Minneapolis and a misspelled sign for
a "Quality Learing [sic] Center" - a reference to a
government-funded child-care center in Minneapolis that has become a
fixation for MAGA in recent days.
Trump's war on immigration obviously isn't going to get us
any kind of utopian future (much as I'd like to ride the
Bass-Pro-Shop spacecraft). But it's important to recognize that these
memes speak to a bone-deep hatred people have for the
realistic, reasonable, moderate center that Washington is so
enamored with. The insanity is the point.
But for anyone not looking forward to this Bass-Pro-Shop,
anti-immigration future, 2026 has already produced another
vision rebelling against the moderate middle. Today, Zohran
Mamdani was sworn in as the Mayor of New York City. As
he took office, he laid his hand on a Quran - something I never
thought I'd see. Bringing together an inclusive coalition around a
vision of a "rent freeze" widely-mocked as unworkable and
unrealistic by the punditocracy, Mamdani is a symbol of the
people's yearning for the impossible. It remains to be
seen if Mamdani will take on the greatest cause of our
political stagnation - the national security state and its own
vision of a society besieged by lurking threats - given
his decision to avoid the issue entirely. He may come to see that
the public is now ready for a big change here, too.
[There's more in this thoughtful article about absurd political
promises.]
Mary Trump: Trump's
Desperate Neediness Laid Bare. (8-min. YouTube
video; Mary Trump Media, January 1, 2026)
Why Trump's craving for fake praise reveals the
damage, desperation, and danger at the core of his
authoritarian behavior.
NEW: Regina Davis Moss: With
"Trump Babies" Remark, Republican Strategy Is Revealed.
President Donald Trump's Administration Will Stop At Nothing
To Ensure The Political Dominance Of White People In This
Country. (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 31,
2025)
This opinion piece argues that:
- A
remark by Dr. Mehmet Oz about "Trump
babies" reveals a Republican strategy to ensure
White political dominance. (During an Oval Office press
conference on November 6, 2005 announcing the lowering of
fertility-drug costs, the former talk-show host and
heart-surgeon–turned–Trump's-administrator for the U.S. Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services said: "We've dropped
[the price of] infertility drugs to make lots of Trump babies,
I'm hoping by the midterms.")
- This strategy includes voter suppression, undermining
reproductive justice, and incentivizing births
among "traditional families".
- The article flags a demographic shift: the non-White
population is projected to become the majority in the U.S. by
2045.
- Policies - like gutting Medicaid and social safety nets
- disproportionately affect the ability of women of color to
have children.
[Starting wars (say, in Venezuela three days after this
article) and disproportionately driving young adults of color to
enlist could also align with this analysis. On January 3,
Trumputin also appears to have personally loaned the U.S. Armed
Forces (and Venezuela!) to his oil-company cronies - and
omitted mention of (while accelerating!) Global
Climate Change.]
Robert Reich: Sunday
Thought: The Reckoning. (Robert Reich, December
28, 2025)
Sometimes a nation needs a nightmare before it can fully
awaken to long-simmering crises.
Martin Luther King Jr. mobilized the nation against racial
injustice by making sure almost everyone in the United States
saw its horrors - on the nightly news, watching peaceful Black
people getting clubbed and arrested for exercising their rights. Were
it not for that painful national exposure to racist brutality,
we wouldn't have gotten the Civil Rights Act or the
Voting Rights Act.
Something similar happened in the first years of the 20th Century,
when muck-raking journalists revealed the monopolies,
corruption, and public-be-damned arrogance of the robber barons.
Were it not for that painful national exposure, we
wouldn't have gotten the reforms of the Progressive Era.
A similar dynamic is playing out as Americans witness the
nightmare of Trump's neo-fascism: its mindless cruelty, blatant
attempts to silence critics, wanton destruction of much of our
government, open racism and misogyny.
Trump has revealed himself in ways his first-term handlers
wouldn't allow:
- a sociopath who posts AI cartoons showing himself
shitting on millions of Americans who marched against him.
- A malignant narcissist unable to respond to the
tragic killings of Rob and Michele Reiner without making it all
about himself.
- A chronic liar who says prices are dropping, when
everyone knows they're rising.
As Americans see all this, outrage has been growing. We are
beginning to mobilize - not all of us, of course, but
the great majority:
- Record numbers of us marched on October 18, No
Kings Day.
- Democratic candidates have won just about every
recent special election and mayoral and gubernatorial contest - and
a remarkable number of down-ballot races in bright-red states and
cities.
- MAGA is coming apart.
- Trump's polls are tanking.
We are organizing and mobilizing with a resolve I have not seen in
my lifetime.
America had to come to this point. We couldn’t go on
as we were, even under Democratic presidents. For 40
years, a narrow economic elite has been siphoning off ever more
wealth and power.
[There's more - in this excellent article (pin its
cartoon to the wall!), and in the year to come!]
George Conway: Trump
Explodes As Canada Redirects Aluminum Exports Away From The
U.S. (20-min. YouTube video; Conway Media,
December 24, 2025)
Canada's unexpected move to send its aluminum shipments to Europe
has ignited a strong reaction from Donald Trump, raising fresh
questions about trade loyalties and economic strategy.
This shift signals growing tensions in North-American trade
relations, and highlights how global alliances are rapidly
changing.
In this video, we break down:
- why Canada made this decision,
- how it impacts the U.S. economy, and
- what it could mean for future trade negotiations.
Stay tuned for the:
- political fallout,
- economic consequences, and
- what comes next,
in this escalating trade story.
Suzanne Nuyen: New
Epstein Files Mention Trump. (13-min. podcast;
NPR, Up First newsletter, December 24, 2025)
The Justice Department yesterday released about 30,000 pages
of new documents, including flight logs, memos and letters,
related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender
Jeffrey Epstein. The files contain hundreds of references to
President Trump.
It's well-established that Epstein was well-connected and knew
many influential figures, including Trump and former president
Bill Clinton, NPR's Sarah McCammon tells Up First. She
emphasizes that Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing, but
notes that the documents continue to highlight the relationship
between Trump and Epstein, raising questions about how much Trump
knew about Epstein's activities.
Thomas L. Knapp: "Big
Balls" Was Just the Beginning. (source is Vittoria
Elliott/WIRED; Rational Review News Digest, December
23, 2025)
"Since the beginning of the Trump administration, the so-called Department
of Government Efficiency/DOGE, the brainchild of billionaire
Elon Musk, has gone through several iterations, leading periodically
to claims - most recently from the director of the Office of
Personnel Management - that the group doesn't exist, or has
vanished altogether.
But DOGE isn't dead. Many of its original members are
in full-time roles at various government agencies …. Even if DOGE
doesn't survive another year, or until the U.S.
semi-quincentennial - its original expiration date, per the
executive order establishing it - the organization's
larger project will continue. DOGE from its
inception was used for two things, both of which have continued
apace:
- the destruction of the administrative state, and
- the wholesale consolidation of data,
in service of concentrating power in the executive branch.
It is a pattern that experts say could spill over beyond the
Trump administration."
[Also see, "Big
Balls" No Longer Works for the U.S. Government. (Reader-Supported
News/RPN, June 25, 2025), below.]
NEW: Anastasia Tsioulcas: It
Was Called The Kennedy Center, But 3 Different
Presidents Shaped It. Now, Trump Adds His Own Name To
It. (2-min.
podcast, photos, videos, etc.; NPR, All Things
Considered, December 19, 2025)
Yesterday, the Kennedy Center's name was changed to The
Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the
Performing Arts. By this morning, workers were already changing
signs on the building itself, although
some lawmakers said that the name can't be changed legally
without Congressional approval.
Though the arts venue is now closely-associated with President
Kennedy, it was three American presidents, including Kennedy,
who envisioned a national cultural center – and what it would
mean to the United States.
[And none of them were named Trump.]
The Eisenhower Administration
In 1955, President Dwight D. Eisenhower first pursued building what
he called an "artistic mecca" in Washington, D.C., and created a
commission to create what was then known as the National Cultural
Center.
Three years later, Congress passed an act to build the new venue
with the stated purpose of presenting classical and contemporary
music, opera, drama, dance, and poetry from the United States and
across the world. Congress also mandated the center to offer public
programs, including educational offerings and programs specifically
for children and older adults.
The Kennedy Administration
A November 1962 fundraiser for the center during the Kennedy
administration featured stars including conductor Leonard Bernstein,
comedian Danny Kaye, poet Robert Frost, singers Marian Anderson and
Harry Belafonte, ballerina Maria Tallchief, pianist Van Cliburn –
and a 7-year-old cellist named Yo-Yo Ma and his sister, 11-year-old
pianist Yeou-Cheng Ma.
In his introduction to their performance, Bernstein specifically
celebrated the siblings as new immigrants to the United States, whom
he hailed as the latest in a long stream of "foreign artists and
scientists and thinkers who have come not only to visit us, but
often to join us as Americans, to become citizens of what to some
has historically been the land of opportunity and to others, the
land of freedom."
At that event, Kennedy said this: "As a great democratic society, we
have a special responsibility to the arts - for art is the great
democrat, calling forth creative genius from every sector of
society, disregarding race or religion or wealth or color. The mere
accumulation of wealth and power is available to the dictator and
the democrat alike; what freedom alone can bring is the liberation
of the human mind and spirit which finds its greatest flowering in
the free society."
Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline were known for championing the arts
at the White House. The president understood the free expression of
creativity as an essential soft power, especially during the Cold
War, as part of a larger race to excellence that encompassed
science, technology, and education – particularly in opposition to
what was then the Soviet Union.
The Johnson Administration
Philip Kennicott, the Pulitzer Prize-winning art and architecture
critic for The Washington Post, said the ideas behind the
Kennedy Center found their fullest expression under Kennedy's
successor, President Lyndon B. Johnson.
"Johnson in the Great Society basically compares the arts to
other fundamental needs", Kennicott said. "He says something like,
'It shouldn't be the case that Americans live so far from the
hospital. They can't get the health care they need. And it should be
the same way for the arts.' Kennedy creates the intellectual
fervor and idea of the arts as essential to American
culture. Johnson then makes it much more about a kind of popular
access and participation at all levels."
Ever since, Kennicott said, the space has existed in a certain
tension between being a palace of the arts and a publicly
accessible, popular venue. It is a grand structure on
the banks of the Potomac River, located at a distance from the
city's center, and decked out in red and gold inside. At the same
time, Kennicott observed: "It's also open. You can go there without
a ticket. You can wander in and hear a free concert. And they have
always worked very hard at the Kennedy Center to be sure that
there's a reason for people to think of it as belonging to them
collectively, even if they're not an operagoer or a symphony ticket
subscriber."
[And they want to rename
its Opera House for Melania Trump...]
Deborah Mary Sophia and Timothy Gardner: Trump
Media Bets On Fusion Energy With $6-Billion
TAE Deal. (Reuters, December 18, 2025)
Summary:
- Deal adds fusion power to Trump family's diverse ventures.
- Trump Media to be holding company housing both
firms' divisions.
- To start building world's first utility-scale fusion power
plant in 2026.
- Fusion-industry reps recently met with U.S. Energy
Dept. reps. U.S. President Donald Trump is getting into
the fusion power business through a $6-Billion merger of
his social-media firm with Google-backed TAE
Technologies, announced just days after industry leaders
met with U.S. Energy Department representatives to urge
federal funding. The all-stock deal announced today is an
ambitious bet on the power boom spurred by artificial-intelligence
data-centers, and adds to the Trump family's growing
roster of diverse ventures from cryptocurrency to real-estate
holdings and mobile services.
After his return to office this year, Trump's close relatives
have pursued ventures leveraging his political power and policy
shifts. The Trump family has, for instance,
amassed $Billions in crypto-related wealth as Trump
throws his support behind digital financial assets. Greater
support from the federal government could potentially boost
the value of this investment, as well. The news put a
charge into shares of the money-losing Trump Media
today, sending them up 35%. The stock, popular with retail
traders, had lost more than 70% of its value over the last 12
months following a big surge during the 2024 campaign. "At
face value, this is a Barbenheimer mashup. Trump Media
gets a dramatic new growth story tied to the AI power
crunch and data-center (hyper-scaler) electricity demand, while TAE
gets a fast lane to being publicly traded via an all-stock
merger valued above $6-Billion", said Michael Ashley Schulman,
partner and chief investment officer at Running Point Capital
Advisors.
Jack Cocchiarella: OMG! Trump
CAUGHT Admitting COLLAPSE After DISASTER Speech! (14-min.
YouTube video; Jack Cocchiarella show, December 18, 2025)
After a news introduction by Lawrence O'Donnell, political
commentator Jack Cocchiarella reacts to Donald Trump
exposing his own collapse.
[As TrumPutin (a.k.a. tRUmp) continues to dismantle the USA,
he also dismantles MAGA and what little is left of himself.]
Rachel Maddow: Trump
Loses On Public-Health Leadership, As States Leave His "Flock
Of Quacks" Behind. (10-min. video; MS NOW,
December 16, 2025)
As Donald Trump fills the leadership roles of the U.S. public-health
system with quacks and kooks, sane states are taking it upon
themselves to employ actual experts with real public-health
administration experience to make sure the public has
credible guidance - even if that guidance is not
coming from the federal government.
Dr. Debra Houry, former CDC official and new senior
medical adviser to the California Department of Health,
talks with Rachel Maddow about this new shift in
public-health authority as Donald Trump and his clown
show are simply ignored.
[A sad second prize; but, as TrumPutin (a.k.a. tRUmp) continues
to dismantle the USA and Congress continues to stand by,
others ARE taking steps to undo some of his once-inconceivable
damage.]
Court
Filing Offers More Details About Trump's White House
Ballroom. (1-min. video; ABC News, December
16, 2025)
The Trump administration reveals new details about the White House
ballroom construction ahead of the first hearing in the lawsuit to
stop the project.
Amy Goodman, DemocracyNow!: Journalist
Reveals FBI Is Offering a "Bounty" for Reporting "Anti-Trump
Thought". A leaked DOJ memo directs the FBI to review
records from the past five years, says Ken Klippenstein.
(47-min. Truthout video; Truthout, December 8, 2025)
A leaked memo by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the
Justice Department and FBI to compile a list of groups that may
be labeled “domestic terrorism” organizations, based on
political views related to immigration, gender and U.S. policy.
The memo was obtained by independent investigative journalist Ken
Klippenstein, who joins us to discuss how it expands on
President Donald Trump's NSPM-7 directive following the
assassination of Charlie Kirk, which ordered a national
strategy to investigate and disrupt groups the administration
claims could incite political violence. Bondi's effort targets
"not just the left", but "anyone who isn't a Trump supporter",
says Klippenstein of the sweeping order, which identifies
targets as:
- entities expressing "opposition to law and immigration
enforcement",
- support for "mass migration and open borders",
- "radical gender ideology", or
- "views described as anti-American, anti-capitalist or
anti-Christian", as well as
- "hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and
morality".
People who report extremists may be financially rewarded,
and the FBI is reviewing records from the past five years,
as well as the present.
[Traitors, defining traitors. "They labelled him a traitor,
themselves the traitor crew, but his soul goes marching on!"]
NEW: Chris Walker: After
Failing to Win Nobel Peace Prize, Trump Is Awarded FIFA's
Newly-Created "Peace Prize". Fédération Internationale de
Football Association's President Gianni Infantino
Described Trump As His "Close Friend" During The Award Ceremony.
(Truthout, December 8, 2025)
On December 5th, FIFA President Gianni Infantino awarded President
Donald Trump the first-ever "FIFA Peace Prize - Football
Unites The World", an award that was created just weeks
after Trump failed to win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Infantino described Trump as his "close friend" during the
ceremony at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., which
took place during
the FIFA World Cup draw.
For several weeks after the award was announced in early November, commentators
have speculated that the award was a sham and would be going
to Trump, given his friendship with Infantino and his
visible dismay at having lost the Nobel Peace Prize.
According to the
international soccer organization's website, the
FIFA peace prize is granted to "individuals who, through their
unwavering commitment and their special actions, have helped to
unite people all over the world in peace and consequently deserve a
special and unique recognition."
[Also, because TrumPutin assumed control of the John
F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in February, and
offered "his friend" inappropriate free use of it (Washington
Post, November 13, 2025). Well, other than the
fabricated "peace prize" for himself; friends trading favors,
at the public's expense.]
That [special-favor, consolation-prize] award came the same week
that the
U.S. Institute of Peace added Trump's name to the outside
of their building, which now reads, "Donald Trump United
States Institute of Peace".
Trump has frequently asserted that he is deserving of
a peace prize, claiming that he has helped end multiple
wars and military conflicts around the world. In reality,
fact-checkers have noted that although Trump has had a hand in
numerous temporary ceasefires, he has not "ended wars" or
"created lasting peace" as he's claimed.
But there are many reasons why Trump may be un-deserving
of a peace award. [Examples, which] likely amount to
war crimes and crimes against humanity. And
Trump has often encouraged violence against dissident voices,
including by stating at his political rallies that he wouldn't
"mind so much" if someone shot members of the press,
or labeling Democratic lawmakers as "seditious" and
threatening "death" as punishment.
FIFA presenting a "peace prize" is a questionable endeavor on its
own, given the organization's willingness to overlook
human-rights abuses in order to advance its own interests.
For example, the organization has selected Saudi Arabia to host the
2034 World Cup, despite that country's documented history of human-rights
violations, use of child-labor, and dangerous working conditions
for foreign laborers, among other concerns.
[But, "Trump friends" DO "overlook abuses (human
rights, political bribes, replacing government administrators
and even Supreme Court judges with 'Trump friends') in order to
advance their own interests".
And TrumPutin also is a traitor, a
crook, a liar, and a great threat to our democracy. No
wonder, that he is his own best friend!]
Julia Jacobs: Six
Memorable Moments From The "Trump Kennedy Center" Honors.
(6-min.
podcast; New York Times, December 8, 2025)
During his first term, President Trump broke with precedent and steered
clear of the Kennedy Center Honors, after some of the
artists being celebrated criticized him.
This year's Honors were essentially the Trump Show.
Mr. Trump, who took over the John F. Kennedy Center
for the Performing Arts at the start of his second term,
hosted the ceremony last night (CBS will broadcast it later this
month). He took an unusually-direct role in choosing
the honorees.
Here are six memorable moments from the weekend of Honors-related
events:
1. The president made a winking mention of a "Trump Kennedy
Center".
In extolling some of the changes that he was making at the arts
center, Mr. Trump feigned a slip-up, referring to "the Trump Kennedy
Center - I mean, Kennedy Center". The friendly audience in the opera
house erupted in laughter and applause. "I'm sorry!", the president
said, holding up his hands and not looking very sorry. It wasn't the
first time that the president had - perhaps half-jokingly - slipped
into his remarks a new name for the decades-old
cultural institution, which he took over after purging
Democrats from its traditionally-bipartisan board of directors,
installing himself as chairman, and replacing its longtime
president with a loyalist.
2. Mr. Trump compared himself to Johnny Carson.
Mr. Trump had late-night talk show hosts on his mind.
When he first took the stage, he suggested that he would try to "act
like Johnny Carson". "We miss Johnny, don't we?", he said, before
launching into what he described as "the most-exciting evening
of this kind in a long, long time in our country."
Mr. Trump brought up one of his favorite targets: the
late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who Mr. Trump has
repeatedly said should be fired from his post.
On Saturday, during a ceremony in the Oval Office in which he
bestowed the honorees with medallions, Trump said: "I've watched
some of the people to host - Jimmy Kimmel was horrible". (Mr. Kimmel
has not hosted the Kennedy Center Honors,
although he has hosted other awards shows, including last year's Academy
Awards, which Mr. Trump criticized at the time. And Mr. Kimmel
was one of the comedians who paid tribute to David Letterman at the
honors in 2012.) Mr. Trump added, "If I can't beat out Jimmy Kimmel
in terms of talent, then I don't think I should be president".
3. The president still loves "Phantom".
A pop-culture obsessive, Mr. Trump was not shy about appearing like
a fan. Especially when it came to Mr. Crawford, who originated the
title role in "Phantom of the Opera" in London in the 1980s.
"I don't want to say how many times I've seen you in 'Phantom'",
Mr. Trump told Mr. Crawford at a dinner at the State Department on
Saturday. At the gala yesterday, Mr. Trump and Mr. Crawford watched
from the presidential box as two singers, David Phelps and Laura
Osnes, performed the musical's title song.
4. This time, the artists did not criticize Mr. Trump.
During his first term, some of the artists who were given honors
at the Kennedy Center - including Norman Lear, the television
producer, and Carmen de Lavallade, the dancer and choreographer - criticized
Mr. Trump and said they would not attend a reception at the White
House. Mr. Trump and the first lady, Melania Trump, announced
that they would not participate in the honors "to allow the honorees
to celebrate without any political distraction".
This time, artists and presenters either praised Mr. Trump
effusively or sought to distance themselves from the politics of
it all. Kelsey Grammer, who was chosen to speak at the
honors in praise of Mr. Crawford, told Fox News on Saturday
that Mr. Trump was "one of the greatest presidents we've ever had".
Gene Simmons of Kiss applauded the idea of having the
president host the program and, in a conversation with reporters on
the red carpet, even praised his plans to build a White House
ballroom. "I believe the ballroom that's being built, which is going
to be twice as big, that is exactly what we need - a face-lift", he
said. "Have you ever been to Versailles? The American house of the
people is shameful."
Mr. Trump appeared to wonder from the stage if some in the audience
wouldn't be so effusive. In previewing performances by the country
musicians Vince Gill, Garth Brooks and Brooks & Dunn, Mr. Trump
told the guests: "They probably don't like me very much. But all I
know is they're big, right? We want bigness. We don't care if they
like Trump - we want bigness, right?" Garth Brooks performed at
President Biden's inauguration in 2021, calling the appearance a
"statement of unity" and "not a political statement".
5. As host, Mr. Trump roasted his audience.
An awards show audience is liable to become subject to some
good-natured ribbing, even when it contains members of Mr. Trump’s
cabinet, Kennedy Center donors and board members, corporate
executives, conservative media personalities and Washington aides.
"So many people I know in this audience, some good, some bad", Mr.
Trump said midway through the show. "Some I really love and respect.
Some I truly hate. But they're having a good time."
And when he spoke about the "persistence" of artists in his opening
remarks, Mr. Trump landed more jabs. "I can say that with a lot of
the members of our audience - I know so many of you, and you are
persistent", he said. "Many of you are miserable, horrible people.
But you are persistent, you never give up. Sometimes I wish you'd
give up, but you don't."
6. The president joked about a new role next year.
With the president exerting more influence over the performing arts
center, a reporter on the red carpet suggested another idea: What
about Mr. Trump as an honoree? "That’s an interesting one, I
haven't thought of that", the president replied, with a glimmer in
his eye. "Yeah, I think I'm going to nominate myself for next
year."
According
To The U.S. National Park Service Website, Martin
Luther King Jr. Day And Juneteenth Are No Longer Listed As
Free-Admission Days. This Marks A Shift For Martin
Luther King Jr. Day, Which Has Been A Free-Admission Day For
Years. (National Park Service, December 6, 2025)
Changes are coming to the National Park Service's
free-admission days next year, impacting when visitors can enter
without paying.
According to the National Park Service website, Martin
Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth are no longer listed as
free-admission days. This marks a shift for Martin Luther King
Jr. Day, which has been a free-admission day for years.
In place of these days, new additions have been made. September
17, Constitution Day, and June 14, Flag Day - which is also
President Donald Trump's birthday - are now among the days
with waived admission fees.
Juneteenth, which commemorates the end of slavery, was only added
as a free-admission day last year.
Officials noted that these free admissions will apply solely
to U.S. citizens and residents.
Mike Nellis: Trump's
Corrupt Pardons Are a Middle Finger to Every American.
Why Cuellar's Pardon Is Different. (Endless
Urgency, December 5, 2025)
I don't think there's anything angering me more right now than the
corruption of the Trump administration - and the sheer
brazenness of these daily deluges of pardons. Trump has
already issued over 1,600 pardons. Joe Biden? Just 80. With
Trump, it's literally one or two people, every day.
I want to zero in on one pardon in particular - though honestly, I
could go off on dozens - and that's the pardon this week of
Democratic Congressman Henry Cuellar of Texas. This one
really, deeply pisses me off - because I have no idea what
Trump got out of it.
I've seen some Dem influencers try to frame it like Trump's
playing 4D chess - pardoning a Democrat to divide us, make us
fight each other. I don't buy that for a second. Trump's not some
Machiavellian genius - that's giving him 'way too much credit. It
also completely glosses over the fact that Cuellar was facing
trial for taking $600,000 in bribes from an oil and gas
company. That's not some minor slip-up. That's
serious.
Some folks have said the case against Cuellar was flimsy. Maybe. I
don't know. But that's what a trial is for. Let the process
play out. Let a jury decide. And I think it's
important for Democrats - especially when it's one of our own -
to say that out loud.
Because I don't know why Trump did this. Maybe money moved behind
the scenes. Maybe there was a political angle. Maybe he just did
it to screw with us. But whatever the reason, he did it - and now
you've got people out here saying, "Well, look, Trump pardons
Democrats, too! That's bipartisan!"
I don't give a damn what party you're in - if you're
accused of a crime, you should go through the process.
Same with the Epstein files. I don't care if Democrats are in
there - release it all. Let the public see what the rich and
powerful are doing behind closed doors. Because corruption is
everywhere. It's unchecked, and it's metastasizing.
Issuing pardons without any meaningful review or explanation
is extremely dangerous, because it signals that normal legal
safeguards no longer apply. This kind of unchecked power
reinforces the reality that we are already living under
increasingly authoritarian conditions - and the more leaders
get away with it, the deeper that governance style entrenches
itself.
Democrats have to be willing to call that out. If we want to
be taken seriously on corruption - which, by the way, should
be one of the defining issues of 2026 and 2028 - we've got
to own it. We've got to take on insider trading in Congress.
We've got to deal with the rot inside our own house.
No more ignoring it because it's inconvenient or uncomfortable.
One of the reasons Trump thrives, is because people believe the
whole damn system is corrupt. That everyone's just in it for
themselves. And you know what? That belief helps him. People say,
"At least Trump's honest about it."
They're not wrong to feel disillusioned. And a lot of Democratic
strategists know that corruption is a message that breaks
through. It's a way to talk about who's winning
and who's losing in Trump's America. It ties directly to issues
people care about: affordability, healthcare, security, fairness.
That's where we can connect.
Same goes for Epstein. The Trump administration has become
a full-blown protection racket for billionaires and their
well-connected buddies. And we’ve got to name that.
But we've also got to name it when it's happening in our own damn
party. No more looking the other way. Maybe Cuellar's innocent. I
honestly don't know. But he never got his day in court. And that
matters.
Here's my final thought: What kind of message does this send
to the people at the FBI and DOJ who are actually trying to
do their jobs - trying to take down bribery schemes, political
corruption, drug traffickers, sexual predators? How
demoralizing it must be, when Trump turns around and pardons the
very people they spent years building a case against!
I think the pardon power, as it exists, needs to go. It
was meant to be a fail-safe - a check on the system, when it
gets something wrong. Instead, it's now the most-blatant
form of institutional corruption we have.
We've got to keep calling it out. If we're serious about
winning elections - about building a country where accountability
and responsibility actually mean something - then this
can't slide. Because this is why a third of Americans
don't vote. They see a rigged game. A system where the
rich and well-connected protect each other, and everyone else
gets screwed.
We can't let it happen again. Not with the pardons.
Not with Epstein. Not with any of it. We've got to keep
the pressure on - even when it's hard, even when it's
messy, even when it's one of our own.
[YES.]
Senate
Votes To Prioritize Oil Over Arctic Conservation.
(Defenders Of Wildlife, December 4, 2025)
The United States Senate today approved resolutions under
the Congressional Review Act to overturn previous Biden
administration protections for the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge, clearing the way for expanded oil and gas
drilling. The rollback is an all-out attack on public lands,
Indigenous communities and wildlife in America's Arctic.
Following the House's decision to nullify these policies, both
chambers have also voted to remove protections from the
National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
"Once again, oil and gas development is taking precedence over
science-based solutions for conserving wildlife and mitigating
climate change. In these instances, the use of the
CRA accomplishes nothing meaningful and instead harms iconic
species such as polar bears, caribou, wolves and migratory
birds", said Robert Dewey, vice president of government
relations at Defenders of Wildlife. "In addition to threatening
wildlife, severe regulatory disruption in Alaska is the
inevitable result of targeted rollbacks in one of America's
most-ecologically-critical regions."
Phil McKenna, Inside Climate News: Rare
Win For Renewable Energy: Trump Admin Funds Geothermal-Network
Expansion. A First-In-The-Nation Heating-And-Cooling Network In
Massachusetts Is Set To Double In Size. (Ars Technica,
December 3, 2025)
The US Department of Energy has approved an $8.6-Million
grant that will allow the nation’s first utility-led geothermal
heating and cooling network to double in size.
Gas-and-electric utility Eversource Energy completed the
first phase of its geothermal network in Framingham,
Massachusetts in 2024. Eversource is a
co-recipient of the award along with the city of Framingham
and HEET,
a Boston-based nonprofit that focuses on geothermal energy and is
the lead recipient of the funding.
Geothermal networks are widely considered among the most
energy-efficient ways to heat and cool buildings. The
federal money will allow Eversource to add approximately 140
new customers to the Framingham network and fund research to monitor
the system's performance.
The federal funding was first announced in December 2024
under the Biden administration. However, the contract
between HEET and the Department of Energy was not
finalized until September 30 - and was just announced today.
The agreement, which allows construction to move forward, comes as the
Trump administration is clawing back billions of dollars in
clean energy funding, including hundreds of millions of dollars
in Massachusetts.
[Translation: TrumPutin blocked this existing funding commitment
until September, when it suited his purposes to permit it -
perhaps to divert attention from his total blocking of such
funds until now, perhaps because he sees a way to
profit from it.]
Deadline White House, Nicolle Wallace: Rachel
Maddow: "He Must Resign!", On Pete Hegseth Shifting Blame For
Caribbean Boat Strikes After Backlash. (9-min.
YouTube video; MS NOW, December 2, 2025)
Rachel Maddow, Host of The Rachel Maddow Show joins Nicolle
Wallace on Deadline White House with:
- reaction to the Trump White House and Defense Secretary
pivoting blame on the boat strikes conducted in the
Caribbean, and
- what it means for the American military, with a
cabinet secretary appearing to throw anybody in the United
States military under the bus in order to escape
accountability.
The Rachel Maddow Show, with Rep. Adam Smith: Possible
War Crime Puts Trump's "Illegal Orders" Freak-Out In New
Context. (10-min. YouTube video; MS Now,
December 2, 2025) Rachel Maddow relays the details of a new Washington
Post report that Donald Trump's secretary of defense,
former weekend cable-news host Pete Hegseth, gave orders to
kill everyone on board a boat he accused of running drugs to
the United States, which meant finishing off the survivors
of an initial strike that destroyed the boat - the literal
text-book definition of an illegal order.
Rep. Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed
Services Committee joins to discuss a new, bipartisan
push to investigate Hegseth's orders.
Alexander Willis: "This Is
Truly Insane": Trump Stuns With Eye-Popping
Multi-Million-Dollar Purchase(s). (RawStory,
November 25, 2025)
Buried within a mountain of financial disclosures made public
recently, is a potentially multi-million-dollar purchase made by
President Donald Trump between August and October, a purchase that
has left some critics stunned by its lack of news coverage.
"In a normal administration, this would be a huge scandal",
wrote journalist and political commentator Molly Jong-Fast in a
social media post today on X.
The purchase was, according to a report today from The New
York Times, for between $1-Million and $5-Million worth
of corporate debt of the technology company Intel.
The disclosure was published amid the Trump administration's
decision to secure a more than $11-Billion stake in the company,
making the U.S. government hold 10% of the company's stock.
"This is truly insane", wrote journalist Ryan Grim in
a social media post on X today, responding to the news.
Intel is not the only company Trump has personally
invested in. Last week, reporting showed that Trump
had also purchased as much as $6-Million in corporate bonds for
the weapons manufacturer Boeing, a purchase made close
to the company being awarded a $877-Million contract from the
Defense Department.
Back in September, Trump also purchased between $500,000 and
$1-Million worth of Boeing bonds. Since January, Trump
has purchased, at a minimum, $185-Million worth of bonds.
These personal investments of the president continue to run
in tandem with the Trump administration's unprecedented
purchases of company stocks and bonds, which officials
say "are being carried out in the interest of national security".
"It is an unusual new strategy that has already committed
more than $10-Billion in taxpayer funds and shows little
sign of slowing", wrote the Times reporter Ana Swanson
in a report today. "The government's growing portfolio of
corporate ownership involves minority stakes, or the option to
take them in the future, in at least nine companies involved in
steel, minerals, nuclear energy, and semiconductors, a New
York Times analysis found. The deals were all struck in the past
six months, with the bulk made in October and November."
Swinging Back Toward Democracy
Rick Wilson: Trump SHUTS DOWN His
Entire Schedule As Chaos ERUPTS Nationwide! (14-min.
YouTube video; America's Hope, November 27, 2025)
(For decades, Rick Wilson worked as a Republican strategist, but his
outspoken criticism of Trump and Trumpism made him a leading figure
in the anti-Trump Republican movement.)
All hell is breaking loose inside Donald Trump's White House.
What's left of it, anyway. And Trump isn't even in the
building because he knows exactly what's happening back
in D.C.
The whole operation is cratering: Marjorie Taylor Green's
resignation, the wave of threatened resignations behind her, the
whispers about firing Cash Patel, Pam Bondi, Christy Gnome, Pete
Hegseth. Take your pick from the loyalty roulette.
MAGA isn't just fractured. It's an open civil war and every
day it gets a little messier for him. Which is why - at
the exact moment Trump is finally taking the heat he's earned for
the cognitive slide, the exhaustion, the short days, the obvious
decline - he's pulling the emergency lever he always pulls:
Cancel everything and hide.
That's where we are. That's how desperate it's gotten.
[One more reason to be thankful, on this Thanksgiving Day.]
Jennifer Welch: Trump's
RUSSIAN COVER-UP Exposed by LEAKED Audio! JD Vance
in HOT WATER! (17-min. YouTube video; IHIP News,
November 26, 2025)
Trump and his cronies were caught in an obvious lie and are
trying to cover for the Kremlin.
[TrumPutin, at his putinest!]
Wajahat Ali and Lev Parnas: How
Trump And The GOP Are Aligning With Putin And Betraying Our
Allies. Putin Continues Playing Trump, As Steve Witkoff Is
Being Sent To Affirm A "Peace Plan" Engineered In Moscow That
Will Abandon Ukraine And US Allies. (40-min. YouTube
video; The Left Hook, November 26, 2025)
With the rise of Trumpism and the mainstreaming of
the global criminal syndicate, we've witnessed a
violent insurrection, extortion, the rise of stochastic terrorism,
and the unethical funding of the AI and Crypto boom.
Now, we're seeing the money laundering of dirty
foreign policy in real time.
Earlier today, Bloomberg published the audio transcript
of a 5-minute phone call between Trump envoy Steve Witkoff and
Yuri Ushakov, a senior foreign policy adviser to Putin, in which
he consulted Russians in October on how to flatter and win-over
Trump. Again, Witkoff serves in the Trump Administration,
which, if you've forgotten by now, is supposed to serve the best
interests of the United States of America. Last week, the US
presented Ukraine with a 28-point plan that seemed to have come
straight from Russia, courtesy of Witkoff, who, coincidentally,
has now been directed by Trump to meet Putin in Moscow.
It all comes full circle, beginning and ending with Russia,
with corrupt middlemen willing to sell out democracy, human
rights, and our allies to serve their financial and ideological
interests.
All of this is par for the course, according to former Trump
fixer Lev Parnas, who engaged in similar shady backdoor deals
while helping Trump during the first Administration.
Parnas has long warned to keep an eye on Witkoff,
who, like Jared Kushner before him, has also secured
$1.5-Billion from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
All of the worst people in the world are drinking all of our
milkshakes, and Ukraine and Eastern Europe are just their
first step. Venezuela and its massive oil reserves are next, as
teased out in Project 2025. Trump's extra-judicial
murders of fishermen aren't just a wag-the-dog distraction
from his flailing presidency, but part and parcel of a larger
global plan to depose Maduro with a Trump-Putin friendly leader
who is "open for business".
Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessen revealed the plot last
week on Fox News: "Capital expenditure is always followed by
job growth. The peace deals - we are seeing a peace dividend from
that. And I think there's a very good chance that if
something happens with Russia, Ukraine, if something happens
down in Venezuela, that we could really see oil prices go down
even more."
Lev joined me today to discuss the breaking news and how it
corresponds to what his sources have been telling him regarding Putin's
long game and Trump's capitulation to the world's worst
authoritarians and oligarchs.
Jimmy Kimmel: Trump
Hurls Insults and Pardons Turkeys. Hegseth Threatens Senator
Kelly. RFK Junior Jr.'s Love Poems.
(15-min. YouTube video; Jimmy Kimmel Live, November 25, 2025)
The White House is ready for Thanksgiving, Trump spent some time
pardoning two turkeys while bragging and ranting about his political
enemies, the day after Thanksgiving is known to plumbers as Brown
Friday, Hegseth opens investigation into Senator Mark Kelly over the
video reminding service members that they're not required to obey
illegal orders, we chat with RFK Junior Jr. about his love poems
& since Trump seems to think that gas costs $2 a gallon we're
asking that if you see a sign that actually says that, please take a
picture and post it with #Gassolini.
Thom Hartmann: Trump
Broke The Law With This Horrible Threat - And It Will Be His
Doom. (RawStory, November 25, 2025)
I've been feeling something unusual these past few weeks: optimism.
Not naïve optimism or the kind that ignores danger, but the
real optimism that arrives when you see people waking
up, standing up, and refusing to bow before a lawless president
who believes rules are for suckers and the Constitution is a
mere suggestion rather than the foundation of our republic.
We're now governed by a man who treats legal limits as
personal insults. Donald Trump doesn't just violate our
nation's norms and laws; like every wannabe third-world
tin-pot dictator before him, he despises the idea that any law
can constrain him at all.
Trump and the spineless sycophants in his administration have
rejected the entire idea of a rules-based society. He and his
lickspittles are:
- turning the presidency into a throne,
- trying to transform you and me into its subjects,
and
- painting as enemies anyone who insists soldiers, sailors,
marines, and airmen (and others in government) should follow the
law.
Under Trump's neo-fascist worldview, the only "legal" act is
obedience, while defiance of his whims and illegal orders is a
crime. We saw this when Trump lashed out at
lawmakers who reminded our military that their sworn oath is to
the Constitution and not to him personally. He posted a rant
about those six CIA and military veterans/lawmakers and wrote
"SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!", in response to their
message that both history and law - including military law -
require soldiers to refuse illegal orders. Then he reposted
a message calling for them to be hanged.
That wasn't a rhetorical flourish: it was Trump's declaration
of war on the rule of law, something so essential that
it's the basis of every democracy and civilized society in history
throughout the world. Instead of respecting American ideals,
he's sounding more like his "good friend", the murderous dictator
of Saudi Arabia (who's given Trump's family $Billions, with
more $Billions on their way).
You'd think that after the My Lai massacre, the horrors
committed at Abu Ghraib, and the Nuremberg trials,
Americans - and Trump and those around him - would have gotten the
message, but over at the Fox propaganda channel and on other
right-wing media they're actually defending this obscene
behavior.
It's also criminal behavior: 18 U.S. Code § 610 makes it a
crime for any federal official - including the
president - to use their authority to intimidate,
threaten, or punish citizens for their political expression,
voting behavior, or dissent. Threatening members of Congress
with execution for following the law is an extreme,
textbook violation.
Meanwhile, the country is learning how this un-American
philosophy plays out on the ground. In cities like
Charlotte, Portland, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc., masked,
anonymous, secret-police-style federal agents descend without
warning, kicking in doors and smashing car windows, arresting U.S.
citizens, stealing people's possessions, invading trusted
community spaces, shuttering businesses, and sending
tens-of-thousands of students home in fear. This isn't border
enforcement or public safety. It's warfare against due
process and America itself. It's gotten so bad that Sen.
Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and her peers are getting death and bomb
threats.
Our nation’s Founders warned us that America's greatest
threats to liberty would come not from abroad, but from leaders
who'd try to turn our legal system and military against us.
James Madison said the means used against foreign dangers,
too-easily become instruments of tyranny at home. That warning
wasn't theoretical: it was aimed directly at moments like this.
Yet we're also seeing something the Founders hoped for, something
that echoed their heroic efforts against King George III: average
Americans refusing to be cowed. People are:
- documenting abuses,
- flooding the streets in peaceful protest,
- forming rapid-response networks,
- hauling the government into court, again and again.
Ordinary citizens are doing the job Congress has been too
afraid, too compromised, or too divided to do. It's the most
patriotic thing happening in America today.
Which is why Trump's response to lawful dissent has been so
horrific: He's demanding Saudi-style executions. He
wasn’t being metaphorical: he demanded actual executions
(although he later pretended to walk it back). That’s the
language of a dictator. It’s the purest expression of Trump's
governing philosophy: if the law gets in his way he simply
ignores it.
This isn't merely corruption. It's not even ordinary
authoritarianism. It's a direct repudiation of the entire
American experiment. Defiance of courts and the law is a
poison that says the only legitimate authority is the will of the
leader, and Trump's entire presidency has featured a non-stop
campaign to replace the rule of law with the rule of Trump:
- He enriched himself in office (he's made
$Billions off his position in just 10 months).
- He wielded the government as a tool of reprisal.
- He attacked judges.
- He extorted foreign governments.
- He stole government property
- and lied about it to federal investigators.
- He's using public office to reward loyalists and punish
critics.
- He now presides over masked, unaccountable paramilitary
raids that terrorize American communities.
The Constitution offers a clear remedy for a president who behaves
like this. Impeachment isn't a political act: it's a
constitutional obligation when a president becomes a danger to
the Republic. And Trump crossed that line long ago. The
only way to restore the rule of law is for Congress to begin
impeachment proceedings immediately. Half measures are
complicity. Silence is complicity. Delay is complicity.
But impeachment alone isn't enough. There must also be
criminal prosecution of Trump and his co-conspirators.
Real prosecution, by real prosecutors, following real evidence, for
real crimes.
And while we're at it, DOGE deserves a pretty-good
looking at, too. And what happened to all those government
investigations of billionaire donors' companies?
Trump and those doing his bidding must face justice.
His children who participated must face it. His bagmen and loyalists
who broke laws to carry out his will must face it. A nation
can’t heal if high office becomes a shield from justice. Equality
before the law is the foundation of any functioning democracy.
If we abandon that principle now, we abandon the Republic itself.
I believe we're at or very near a turning point:
- People are rising up.
- Communities are resisting.
- Judges are pushing back.
- Journalists are exposing what the administration wants
hidden.
- The illusion of Trump's invincibility is cracking.
- Billionaires who believed he could terrorize the country
into submission on their behalf, are discovering that Americans
refuse to bow.
This country was built by people who rejected kings. It can
survive this counterfeit king, too. But only if we act. Only
if we insist that the Constitution still has meaning. Only if we
refuse to let a lawless president redefine the rule of law as
disloyalty.
Trump has declared war on the American Way. The only
acceptable response is the full force of our constitutional
system:
- impeachment,
- prosecution, and
- the unrelenting assertion that no man, no family,
and no political movement is above the law.
I realize the political reality is that Mike Johnson won't allow
such a vote in the House, and the Senate is now controlled by
Republicans so timid and cowed by Trump that a GOP senator who's a
physician is afraid to criticize Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
But we're only 12-months away from an election that could
sweep both bodies, and we must lay the foundation now for that.
That means;
- waking up as many people as possible (share
this newsletter and others!),
- engaging with groups like Indivisible, and
- supporting litigators and progressive Democrats.
We can do this. We just need resolve, passion, and to begin
the hard work of reclaiming the American Way and the American
Dream - as Democrats did in the 1930s and the 1960s, and
both parties did to oust Nixon and imprison his cronies in the
1970s.
[So well said, that we posted it in full!]
The Best People, with Nicolle Wallace and Heather Cox
Richardson: Americans Are
Saying "Hell No!" To Trump Fascism - And It's Working.
(50-min. YouTube video; MS NOW, November 25, 2025)
Heather Cox Richardson sees a significant realignment
happening in our democracy right now. And the return of human
agency. She joins Nicolle Wallace for a wide-ranging
conversation on "The Best People". Cox Richardson highlights the
growing conflict between the citizenry and an executive branch
that shows a bent toward aristocracy over democracy, but sees
progress happening right now. "Listen, there's two ways we
could go. We could embrace fascism fully, which is absolutely
the direction that this government is going. Or we
could do what Americans before us have done and say, "hell, no!"
And it certainly feels to me like that's the direction we're
going.
Heather says:
- the reclaiming of Democracy is the work of everyday people
and
- it's happening now in new and unseen communities,
- but cautions: "It's a process, not an instant fix".
She talks about:
- the need for an FDR moment,
- what we can learn from Abraham Lincoln's rise, and
- why Senate Republicans went underground like "a bunch
of freaking moles".
You'll also see Heather turn the tables and interview Nicolle!
Jennifer Welch: MAGA
Politicians HATE Trump!! MASSIVE MAGA Resignations INCOMING!?
(11-min. YouTube video; IHIP News, November 25, 2025)
The Trump administration is such a national embarrassment,
Republican politicians are trying to find the exit.
Jennifer Welch and Angie "Pumps" Sullivan: LEAKED
Plan PROVES Trump Is OWNED By Russia! What Does The KREMLIN
Have On Trump? (17-min. YouTube video; IHIP
News, November 24, 2025)
Leaked Trump "peace plan" was clearly written by the Russian
government and is sending MAGA into panic mode.
[TrumPutin won't like this video. Memorize and share.]
Heather Cox Richardson: A
Judge Today Dismissed The Indictments Of Former Federal
Bureau Of Investigation Director James Comey And New
York Attorney General Letitia James, Ruling That President
Donald J. Trump's Revenge Action Overstepped His Authority.
Trump Plans To Appeal Immediately. (Letters from
an American, November 24, 2025)
U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie of South Carolina today
dismissed the indictments of former Federal Bureau of
Investigation director James Comey and New York
Attorney General Letitia James, ruling that President
Donald J. Trump's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim
U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid.
Trump had demanded the indictment of the two. When he was FBI
director, Comey had refused to drop an investigation into
Trump's then–national security advisor Mike Flynn, who had lied
to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian operative
before Trump took office. James had successfully sued Trump,
several of his children, and the Trump Organization for fraud,
and when the interim U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of
Virginia, Erik Seibert, said there was not enough evidence to
indict them, Trump forced him out of office and replaced him
with Halligan, a former insurance lawyer and Trump aide.
Within days, Halligan obtained a grand jury indictment for
Comey, charging him with lying to Congress, and another
for James, charging her with alleged mortgage fraud. As
David Kurtz points out in Talking Points Memo, the
indictments were widely understood to be targeted prosecutions
of those Trump considered enemies.
By law, after a Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney leaves the job, the
attorney general can appoint an interim U.S. attorney for 120 days.
If the position still has not been filled, the right to make
another interim appointment goes to the district court, which
has sole authority over the position until the Senate
confirms a president's nominee. This provision prevents a
president from making an end run around the Senate's duty to
advise and consent by making consecutive 120-day appointments.
The Trump administration attempted to thwart this law.
Trump appointed Seibert the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern
District of Virginia on January 21, and as the 120-day deadline
approached, he nominated Seibert for the position. The district
judges voted unanimously to keep Siebert on as the interim U.S.
attorney as his nomination proceeded. But then Siebert
declined to prosecute Comey and James, and Trump forced him out,
pushing Attorney General Pam Bondi to put Halligan into his place
as a new interim appointment.
Today, Currie found that Halligan's appointment violated not
only the law, but also the appointment clause of the U.S.
Constitution, which requires the president to obtain the
"advice and consent of the Senate" for such appointments. That unlawful
appointment means that all of Halligan's actions
undertaken as a U.S. attorney are invalid. Because she was
the only prosecutor to sign off on the Comey and James
prosecutions, they, too, are invalid.
After the judge's decision, Comey posted a video saying
that while the case mattered to him personally, "it matters
most because a message has to be sent that the president of the
United States cannot use the Department of Justice to target his
political enemies. I don't care what your politics
are. You have to see that as fundamentally un-American and a
threat to the rule of law that keeps all of us free." He
called for Americans to "stand up and show the fools who would
frighten us, who would divide us, that we're made of stronger
stuff, that we believe in the rule of law, that we
believe in the importance of doing things BY the law."
Attorney General Bondi said the government will "be taking all
available legal action, including an immediate appeal". Shut
down by the courts, Trump is turning to military justice to
enforce his will.
[There's more - but with TrumPutin, it's all of the same
pattern.]
Robert Davis: Ex-GOP
Analyst Rick Wilson Issues Dire Warning About Trump
After Midterm: "He Is Planning A Siege."
(RawStory, November 23, 2025)
President Donald Trump appears to be staring down lame-duck status
as the 2026 midterm election approaches:
- The president's overall-approval rating was at 40% today (The
Economist), down 16 points from when he took office.
- Similarly, Americans have largely soured on Trump's domestic
and economic policies.
- Republicans also handed Trump a stern rejection by
overwhelmingly supporting legislation to force the release of the
Jeffrey Epstein files (despite the administration's attempts
to pressure people to vote against the bill.
But according to one ex-GOP analyst, that doesn't mean Trump's
administration will be any less dangerous, even IF the GOP gets
the thrashing as experts expect. Rick Wilson, a co-founder
of The Lincoln Project and a former Republican
strategist, argued in a new Substack essay that
these issues can lead one to believe things are about to
return to normal. However, Wilson warned, Trump
is likely to become more dangerous as his support fades. "Trump
is not planning a quiet sunset", Wilson wrote. "He is
planning a siege."
The president appears to be laying the groundwork for this siege by
appointing people who challenged the legitimacy of the
2020 election to key posts within the federal
government. One such individual is Heather Honey, Trump's
deputy assistant secretary for election integrity at the
Department of Homeland Security. Honey worked for a state
anti-voting group in Pennsylvania and continues to
spread the debunked theory that Trump lost the 2020 election
because of widespread voter fraud, according to Democracy
Docket.
"Trump is already aiming the federal machine at the midterms...If
you think a lame duck can't cause chaos, you didn't learn the
lesson of 2020", Wilson wrote. That lame-duck period "gave
Trump and his allies space to organize a coup attempt...Now
imagine that same playbook with four years of institutional
capture, a more radical staff, and a president who knows he
can't be re-elected and doesn't care who he burns. Watch
what happens in red-state legislatures and courts when Trump calls
on them to throw out the election results, or when Mike Johnson
declines to seat newly elected members."
Seth Meyers: MAGA Stunned
After Zohran Mamdani Charms Donald Trump In The Oval
Office. (11-min. YouTube video; A Closer Look,
November 24, 2025)
[TrumPutin lied hard to keep him out; but now that he IS the
new mayor of NYC, where Trump owns big-time property...]
PvtJarHead: Numerous
Top MAGA X.COM/Twitter Accounts Revealed To
Be Foreign Agitators After New-Feature Rollout.
(Daily KOS, November 23, 2025)
Elon Musk's social-media site X has rolled out a new
feature in an effort to increase transparency - and unwittingly
revealed that many of the site's top MAGA influencers are
actually foreign actors.
The new "About This Account" feature, which became
available to X users two days ago, allows others to
see where an account is based, when they joined the platform,
how often they have changed their username, and how they
downloaded the X app.
Upon rollout, rival factions began to inspect just where their
online adversaries were really based on the combative social
platform - with dozens of major MAGA and right-wing
influencer accounts revealed to be based overseas.
Twitter users rounded up dozens of these accounts, sharing their
disbelief. Some Democratic influencers rejoiced: Harry Sisson, a
Gen-Z, pro-Biden creator, said, "This is easily one of the greatest
days on this platform. Seeing all of these MAGA accounts get exposed
as foreign actors trying to destroy the United States is a complete
vindication of Democrats, like myself and many on here, who have
been warning about this."
There were some rumors that Musk had disabled the feature upon
seeing so many of his biggest fans unmasked, but as of today, it
seems to still be intact.
Bots spreading misinformation and propaganda has been a
long-running problem on Twitter, a problem that has been
significantly exacerbated since Musk bought it in October 2022 and
then renamed it X. Its AI chatbot, Grok, has also
been found to frequently make and amplify false claims.
Some of the many articles re this new discovery:
The
Daily Beast: "Musk and MAGA are suffering a
self-inflicted injury..."
New
Republic: "They've spent years stoking division in
America..."
The
Guardian: "Now their arrogance has blown up in their
faces..."
RawStory:
"The hits keep coming…"
Reddit:
"I've warned of shit like this before..."
[Whoops! More trouble for TrumPutin...]
Ken Klippenstein: National
Security Moms Are Here. Trump's Call For Arresting
Democrats Targets New Political Bloc.
(Substack, November 20, 2025)
"SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!", Trump bellowed
on social media today in one of his headline-grabbing attacks on
Democrats. It obscures a more important issue: the rise of the
national security moms.
Ever since Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill won their governor
seats, the "next generation" of Democrats have declared a
multi-front war against the Party old guard, yes, but also
against the populist wave embodied by Zohran Mamdani.
Spanberger, a former CIA officer, and Sherrill, a former Navy
helicopter pilot, embody the
national-security-state-alum-turned-politician that the
Democratic Party has come to see as its salvation.
Seen as the alternative to the anti-establishment
Mamdani-types, they're cast as a return to sober,
responsible, and (most importantly) predictable leadership.
Other Democrats in this mold - Senators Elissa Slotkin
(former CIA) and Mark Kelly (former Navy), as well as
Representatives Jason Crow (former Army), Chris Deluzio (former
Navy), Maggie Goodlander (former Navy) and Chrissy Houlahan (former
Air Force) - circulated a video this week urging their
colleagues in the military and intelligence community to resist
any unlawful orders coming down from the Trump administration.
Set to soaring West-Wing-style music, the video featured these
members of Congress rattling off their national security credentials
before issuing a solemn call for American troops to uphold
the Constitution.
Per the video:
"We want to speak directly to members of the military and the
intelligence community, who take risks each day to keep Americans
safe. We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right
now. Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
This administration is pitting our uniform-, military- and
intelligence-community professionals against American citizens
like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this
constitution. Right now, the threats to our Constitution
aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our
laws are clear: you can refuse illegal orders."
Trump responded by calling for the members to be "arrested
and put on trial". "Their words cannot be allowed
to stand", Trump said in a post on social media "We
won't have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET.
President DJT."
The incident is the highest-profile moment yet for the
national security moms, a term that appeared in a
Democratic-Party press release this summer. In August, the
Democratic Governors Association issued a post to its website
titled, "The Year of the National Security Mom".
While acknowledging that national security isn't a top policy
concern for voters, the post went on to argue that national
security experience signals qualities that could bring the Party
back to power. "Ms. Spanberger and Ms. Sherrill stand as
an emerging model of leader, one whose experience combines
maternal-nurturing with 'Who's your daddy?' bad-assery in a way
that confounds partisan molds", the post says.
"Spanberger posits that for voters sizing her up, her work at the
CIA can serve as a shortcut to, "She's tough. She's hard-working.
She's thorough." The post declared that then-candidates for governor
"Spanberger and Sherrill are the next generation of leadership" - a
phrase echoed by Democratic Party leaders throughout and since the
election.
Before the November elections, when asked if Zohran Mamdani was the
future of the Democratic Party, House Minority Leader Hakeem
Jeffries said simply: "No". Asked about Mamdani earlier this month,
Congresswoman Debbie Dingell replied: "I'm going to focus on the
election of Abigail Spanberger, who is clearly a moderate, as is
Mikie Sherrill. Both women [have] strong military and national
intelligence backgrounds."
When asked after the election if Mamdani was now the soul of the
Democratic Party, Jeffries further said that that title
belonged to Spanberger and Sherrill. Spanberger made clear her
disdain for Mamdani when she asserted that "he wasn't a
Democrat" - a puzzling remark, given that he had won the
Democratic nomination.
The national-security moms have emerged as an alternative to
the populist wave, as well as successors to the old guard.
Internal Democratic talking points produced in response to
Trump's call for them to be arrested - leaked to me from a source
close to the national-security moms - provide some insight
into their mindset. Put simply, it's an obsession
with policies and procedures, citing the Manual for Courts
Martial and the Defense Department's Law of War Manual to make the
point that what they'd said was accurate and legal.
This edge-of-your-seat reading is what they want the future of
politics to look like: a process-obsessed snoozefest that might
make sense for a legal briefing, but not talking points for the
general public.
What’s more, it's doubtful that many see the endless wars this group
of politicians served in as having enhanced our national security.
That's what also makes the declaration of war by the national
security moms such a losing strategy if it is intended to be
the rebranding of the next generation and the path to 2028. It
isn't about any meaningful definition of national security - that
is, making the country safer. It is about "qualifications" to
run, about process and the rules, about sticking with the
possible rather than the desirable, a low-risk and
low-collateral-damage version of politics that people don't
seem to be looking for right now. It promises stability rather
than change.
I've already written about Mamdani's own salute to national
security in keeping on NYPD commissioner Jessica Tisch and
about how the full release of the Epstein files will get
steamrolled by "national security concerns". Today's war is
national security versus the people, plain and simple.
Judge
Orders Trump Administration To End National Guard Deployment
In Washington, DC. (1-min. AP video; AP
News, November 20, 2025)
U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb concluded that President Donald
Trump's military takeover in Washington, D.C. illegally
intrudes on local officials' authority to direct law enforcement
in the district.
Seung Min Kim: Trump
Signs Bill To Release Jeffrey Epstein Case Files, After
Fighting It For Months. (AP News, November 19,
2025)
President Donald Trump signed legislation tonight that compels
his administration to release files on convicted sex-offender
Jeffrey Epstein, bowing to political pressure from his own party
after initially resisting those efforts. Trump could have chosen
to release many of the files on his own, months ago.
"Democrats have used the 'Epstein' issue, which affects them far
more than the Republican Party, in order to try and distract from
our AMAZING Victories", Trump said in a social-media post as he
announced he had signed the bill.
Now, the bill requires the Justice Department to release all
files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any
information about the investigation into his death in a federal
prison in 2019, within 30 days. It allows for redactions
about Epstein's victims for on-going federal investigations, but
DOJ cannot withhold information due to "embarrassment,
reputational harm, or political sensitivity".
It was a remarkable turn of events for what was once a
far-fetched effort - by an odd congressional
coalition of Democrats, one GOP antagonist of the
president, and a handful of erstwhile Trump loyalists - to
force the disclosure of case files. As
recently as last week, the Trump administration even summoned one
Republican proponent of releasing the files, Rep. Lauren Boebert of
Colorado, to the Situation Room to discuss the matter, although she
did not change her mind.
[Read the rest, and see Clay Bennett's cartoon,
below.]
Emily Singer: Pam
Bondi Won't Commit To Releasing Full Epstein Files.
(1-min. YouTube video; Daily Kos, November 19, 2025)
Attorney General Pam Bondi today refused to commit to releasing
all of the Epstein files, giving a cagey answer that suggests it
may be a long time before we ever see the documents related to the
accused child-sex trafficker. Bondi's comment came at a news
conference, in which a reporter asked whether the investigation
that President Donald Trump ordered into the deceased Epstein's
ties to Democrats would preclude her from releasing documents
in accordance with the bill Congress passed yesterday.
Bondi did not give a yes or no answer, and instead chose to defend
her office's handling of the files. "We have released 33,000,
over 33,000 Epstein documents to the Hill, and we will
continue to follow the law and to have maximum transparency",
Bondi said - refusing to answer the question asked of her.
Of course, Bondi has not been transparent about the
files. She and her minions - including Deputy Attorney General
Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel, who flanked her at today's
news conference - have done everything in their power to keep
the documents under wraps.
Blanche, who is Trump’s former criminal defense attorney,
interviewed jailed Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell earlier
this year in what amounted to a rigged conversation in which
Maxwell said Trump was not involved in Epstein's crimes. Of
course, Maxwell had every reason to lie, as she is seeking
clemency from Trump in order to be released from her
decades-long prison sentence for federal sex-trafficking charges. She
was already rewarded handsomely after that interview with
a transfer to a minimum-security prison, where she is
reportedly receiving more-favorable treatment than other inmates.
[What, she wants us to trust her and TrumPutin's other co-liars?]
Emily Singer: Mike
Johnson Looks Like An Idiot After The Epstein Vote.
(1-min. YouTube video, and "Nothing
To Hide" Cartoon by Clay Bennett; Daily Kos,
November 19, 2025)
House Speaker Mike Johnson was "deeply disappointed" with the
Epstein files outcome. Despite House Speaker Mike Johnson's best
efforts to run interference for President Donald Trump, the bill
to force his Dear Leader to release the Epstein files easily
passed both chambers of Congress yesterday, and now heads to
Trump's desk for a signature.
The Epstein files saga is a total and complete loss for Johnson, who
spent months trying to convince the public that there was no need
for them to see the documents related to now-deceased convicted
child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, while at the same time
attempting to block the legislation that would force Trump to
release the documents from ever getting a vote in the first place.
In the end, both efforts failed.
[Mike Johnson "looks like an idiot"? No; more like one more
TrumPutin-appointed conspirator against democracy. Don't miss the
rest of this article, and its TrumPutin cartoon!]
NEW: Oliver Willis: So
Much For Day 1: Fox News Says, "Don't Blame Trump
For Awful Economy." (2-min. YouTube video
of Fox News video, and Cartoon by Drew Sheneman;
Daily Kos, November 19, 2025)
Trump's approval has hit a new low but, somehow, Fox
News thinks it's not his fault. In a Reuters/Ipsos
poll released yesterday, Trump is at 38% overall
approval, the lowest rating in that poll since he returned
to the White House in January. Of particular concern for
respondents was Trump's handling of everyday expenses, with
only 26% surveyed approving his approach to the issue.
During a segment on today’s edition of "Fox & Friends",
co-host Lawrence Jones lamented the current state of affairs for
Trump as "unfair". "It has only been nine months", Jones said,
arguing that Trump needs more time in the presidency for his
economic ideas to work. "It's kind of unfair for someone that's been
there nine months, to put it all on them."
Jones' comment runs in stark contrast to Trump's own rhetoric
from the 2024 campaign, where he made a roster of claims about
policy that he would implement on Day 1 to address economic issues.
The vast majority of those promises were broken, and Trump
has squandered the growing economy he inherited from
former President Joe Biden (as he did in his first term following
former President Barack Obama).
The Fox host's excuses echo Speaker Mike Johnson, who said on
November 6 in response to a question about rising food prices, "All
of the economists have shown that food prices always go
up. There's an inflationary level that's built into grocery
prices.'
In response to Johnson, New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani
noted, "In 2024, Republicans promised to lower the cost of
groceries. In 2025, they're shrugging it off, saying
'food prices always go up.'"
Prices have increased for consumers - in large part due to
the tariffs that Trump has implemented, artificially-increasing
costs that have been passed along to families. Trump's
own Commerce Department released data today, showing that Trump's
so-called Liberation-Day tariffs increased the trade
deficit and reduced imports to the U.S. Trump
has dismissed concerns about affordability, arguing that it is
simply an issue made up by Democrats.
Simultaneously, Democrats have been winning elections by
prioritizing the issue and illustrating the role of
Republican policies in increasing costs for families. Democrats
won races in New York City, Virginia, New Jersey, and other areas
on this platform - while the Right has marched in lockstep
behind Trump's failing approach. How unfair.
NEW: Lisa Needham; ICE
Expands Surveillance State In New And Awful Ways.
(Cartoon by Mike Luckovich; Daily Kos, November 19, 2005)<
On November 12, we learned that Immigration and Customs
Enforcement was going
to hire bounty hunters to track down immigrants and feed
them to ICE. But what if government officials made that much, much
worse? Welcome to this week.<
Is it a good sign of a healthy democracy if the government starts
paying people to snitch on their neighbors? 404 Media is
reporting that ICE is recruiting ex-military and ex-law
enforcement officers to track down immigrants and feed
them to ICE. For their troubles, they get $300 for every
person whose address they verify and then turn over to the gaping,
vicious maw of ICE. Sure, this is theoretically limited to
ex-military and ex-cops, but those folks aren't still in the
military or law enforcement. They're private citizens
with no particular expertise, and there is certainly no reason
that this can't just expand to anyone who is willing to take
$300-a-pop to surveil and betray their neighbors. It's
now time to just throw open the doors - and toss some cash - to
anyone craven enough to do this. 404 Media found that at
least one government contractor appears to be soliciting
applications via LinkedIn. Wouldn't this sort of thing be
more successful over at X? It's already a Nazi bar, so it
seems like it would be a dandy place to find terrible people.
It's not a stretch to say that you can draw a direct line
from SB8, the Texas bounty-hunter
law, to this awful plan. In that instance, Texas
empowered literally anyone to sue someone who aided or abetted
someone obtaining an abortion. This weaponization of private
actors has led to things like a dude suing
his ex-wife’s friends because they may have helped her get a
medication abortion.
In Texas, if the abortion bounty hunters prevail in court - and the
law is written so that it is nearly certain they would do so - they
get at least $10,000. Whoo! Makes that $300-per-immigrant look
pretty paltry. To get your money in Texas requires a trial, but to
get your ICE money, you just have to slide over some addresses.
NEW: Alix Breeden: Trump
Follows Through On Promise To Destroy The Education
Department. (Cartoon by Clay Jones; Daily
Kos, November 19, 2025)
President Donald Trump made a promise on the campaign trail to shutter
the Department of Education, and now that promise is
coming to fruition.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon announced yesterday that six
programs under her jurisdiction will be transferred to the
Departments of State, Interior, Labor, and Health and Human
Services. "The Trump Administration is taking bold
action to break up the federal education bureaucracy and return
education to the states", she said in the press release. "As we
partner with these agencies to improve federal programs, we will
continue to gather best practices in each state through our 50-state
tour, empower local leaders in K-12 education, restore excellence to
higher education, and work with Congress to codify these reforms."
And, of course, since the sole purpose of education is to prepare
students for the workforce, McMahon told reporters yesterday that the
Labor Department will take over programs for K-12 students.
The process of tearing apart the Education Department started in
March when Trump signed an executive order attempting to shut it
down, which was halted because it requires congressional approval. But
this hindrance was merely used as an excuse to dismantle the
department from within, so McMahon got to work laying off nearly
half of her department's workforce. From threatening
lawsuits against universities she claims to be
racial-profiling white people, to pushing the Trump
administration's anti-trans agenda, McMahon has been hard at
work hacking away at education from all angles.
Essentially, McMahon has been rendering her department
useless to prove to Trump's buddies in Congress that it should
be shut down for good. She even argued in an op-ed that,
since schools were still able to run during the government shutdown,
we don't need the Education Department after all. "Students
kept going to class. Teachers continued to get paid. There were no
disruptions in sports seasons or bus routes", McMahon wrote.
At least without an Education Department, we won’t have to hear her
idiotic takes anymore.
NEW: Lisa Needham: Shady
Crypto Company Doesn't "Have A Problem" With Bribing
Trump. (Daily Kos, November 19, 2025)
President Donald Trump loves his bribes. He has made
no secret of the fact that giving him millions of dollars
- be that in the form of sham lawsuit settlements or "donations"
to one of his many
tacky projects - is a sure-fire way to get what
you want. And while most companies tend to shy
away from explicitly saying, "Hell yeah, we’re down for bribes", Coinbase
is out and proud about buying the president. During an
appearance at Axios' BFD event, Coinbase
President and COO Emilie Choi was
asked if the company's donation to Trump's ballroom was meant
"to keep good relations with the White House". Choi didn't hesitate
or qualify her answer: "Sure!" "Frankly, I don't even have a problem
[with it]", she added. "I think if you go to D.C., there's a lot of
buildings that need to be updated, and so if private industry has to
do that, it is what it is."
We typically fix public buildings using a little thing called
"taxpayer money", but that's for suckers. Trump would never know
how much you love him, in that situation as just another
corporate taxpayer. But if you slide him a bunch of cash
directly, you can display the fealty he craves.
Even before Trump's second term began, Coinbase already knew
it hit
the jackpot. You see, the Biden administration had an
annoying habit of trying to regulate the crypto industry.
But after Trump won the 2024 election, Coinbase's top
lawyer went on X to say that the
regulation would “never be adopted; it is DOA with the next
admin and DOA in the courts". He was right. In May, the
Consumer Finance Protection Bureau withdrew the regulation.
Though that was an abstract giveaway to the entire
crypto industry that just happened to benefit Coinbase,
the company also got some treats directly:
- In February, the Securities and Exchange Commission
helpfully dismissed its civil enforcement action
against Coinbase.
- In 2023, the
SEC sued Coinbase for making $Billions by
acting as an unregistered broker, but it only cost Coinbase a paltry $1-Million donation
to Trump's inauguration slush fund to make it disappear.
Quite the bargain!
It's just common sense for the crypto folks to suck up to Trump.
They get lax regulations, and they can even get
a sweet
pardon like Binance founder Changpeng
Zhao, who received a pardon from President Donald Trump as a reward
for his bribes.
For its part, Coinbase is taking a belt-and-suspenders
approach. Trump has made sure that the federal government won't
touch the company - as long as it keeps the cash flowing. But what
if some pesky shareholders or state regulators get it in their head
that they have the right to demand that Coinbase follow
the law? Fortunately, there's a solution for that. Coinbase
is currently incorporated in Delaware, which has long been a
business hub. But Texas has recently made a play for
companies to reincorporate there, promising:
- even-fewer regulations than Delaware,
- lower taxes, and
- a special business court designed to be extra friendly to
businesses.
So that's where Coinbase is going.
But while all of this corruption is playing out right in the
open, Coinbase still gets irked if anyone actually
points it out. When Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of
Connecticut said that the
crypto industry's hand in Trump's ballroom was "an example of
how Trump's corruption factory works", Coinbase's
chief policy officer whined that "corporations from all
industries donated as well".
That makes it okay, then! Everybody knows that, if a broad
swath of corporations bribes the president, then it's
totally fine.
But in light of Choi's Axios confession, Coinbase's
past fury at being called out for its pay-to-play efforts rings
pretty hollow. There's no reason to bother pretending that
this is above-board, because no government institution
is going to intervene. Now is the time to go all in on open
corruption, and Coinbase is leading the way.
NEW: Stephen Groves, Matt Brown And Joey Cappelletti: What's
Next For The Epstein Files, After Trump's Social-Media
Posts? (6
short videos; AP News, November 17, 2025)
The House is heading toward a vote tomorrow on a bill to force
the Justice Department to release the case files it has
collected on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, pushing
past a months-long effort by President Donald Trump and Republican
leaders to stymie the effort.
The push for more disclosure in the years-old sex-trafficking
investigation into Epstein has come roaring back, since the House
returned to Washington after a nearly two-month absence during
the government shutdown. As lawmakers returned last week, they
were greeted by new details from a tranche of Epstein's emails,
including claims that Trump had "spent hours" at Epstein's
house with a sex-trafficking victim and that he "knew
about the girls".
The new revelations and the coming vote showed one of the rare
instances where Trump has not been able to exhibit
almost-total control over his party. Bowing to the
growing momentum behind the bill, Trump indicated today that he
would sign the bill if it passes both chambers of Congress.
The sex-trafficking case into Epstein has only grown in
political influence, since Epstein killed himself in a Manhattan
jail while awaiting trial in 2019. He faced charges that he
sexually-abused and trafficked under-age girls, and since then
many more have said they were abused by the well-connected
financier.
Now, many lawmakers say that the Justice Department also
needs to release its case files on Epstein, arguing that it
could show that other people were aware of or complicit in
Epstein’s sexual abuse. House Democrats, joined by a few key
Republicans, have been able to force a vote on the bill to do
that by using a rarely-successful measure called a discharge
petition.
As it became apparent that the bill will pass the House, most
likely with significant support from Republican lawmakers,
Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson changed their approach
from outright opposition to declarations of indifference.
"Here’s what I want: We have nothing to do with Epstein. The
Democrats do", Trump told reporters, adding that he believed
the issue was distracting from his accomplishments.
[Wrong. This issue, like so many others, is focusing on TrumPutin's
accomplishments - for Putin.]
Endless Urgency, with Mike Nellis: The
Common Thread Between The Epstein Cover-Up And Trump's Corrupt
Pardons. Two Scandals, One Truth. (Substack,
November 17, 2025)
I continue to be completely bewildered that the biggest story in the
country isn't Donald Trump admitting - on live TV, on 60
Minutes, just two weeks ago - that he has no idea who he's
pardoning. He said it out loud, and the media just kind of
shrugged and moved on.
Hafiz Rashid: Federal
Judge Orders Hundreds Of ICE Detainees To Be Released. Trump's
Federal Takeover Of Chicago Is Ending In A Major Flop.
(New Republic, November 12, 2025)
A federal judge today ordered the release of hundreds of
immigrants detained in Chicago, amid the Trump administration's
reckless "Operation Midway Blitz".
U.S District Judge Jeffrey Cummings said the government may have
violated a consent decree against "warrantless arrests"
because most of those who were arrested didn't have a criminal
record or deportation order. Cummings ordered that
those who do not pose a significant risk or have
mandatory detention orders be granted bond by November
21.
Right Now, with Perry Bacon: The
Young Voters And Minorities Who Backed Trump In 2024 Hate Him
Now. (31-min.
YouTube video; New Republic, November 12, 2025)
Political analyst Michael Podhorzer discusses why the Republican
candidates in New Jersey and Virginia came nowhere near matching
Trump's 2024 support among voters of color and young voters.
Voters under age 30, Black voters, and Latinos were much
more supportive of President Trump in 2024 than they were of past
Republican presidential candidates. But exit polls, conducted
last week of the races in New Jersey and Virginia, show that Republican
candidates didn't even match Trump's lowered performance.
The GOP lost overwhelmingly among all three voting blocs.
Michael Podhorzer, former political director of the AFL-CIO and now
a prominent writer on Substack, argues that the idea
that Trump had built some kind of durable multi-racial
working-class coalition was always over-stated. He says both the
2024 and 2025 elections can be attributed to backlash against
the incumbent president.
Podhorzer and Perry also discuss the election results in New
York City, which showed that Zohran Mamdani's base isn't
really working-class voters but self-identified liberals and
those under 30. He won more than 70% of those two
blocs, while running about evenly with Andrew
Cuomo among voters without college degrees and those with
less than $50,000 in family income.
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: Trump
Freaks Out Over Epstein Emails in Furious Rant.
(New Republic, November 12, 2025)
Donald Trump has finally broken his silence about the damning new
Epstein details.
Donald Trump is beginning to squirm under pressure as Congress
pushes to release the main Epstein files. Trump ranted on his "Truth
Social" today about the bipartisan bid to make the case files
public, claiming that the entire effort was a "hoax" to deflect from
the government shut-down. "Only a very bad, or stupid, Republican
would fall into that trap", Trump posted. "The Democrats cost our
Country $1.5-Trillion Dollars with their recent antics of viciously
closing our Country, while at the same time putting many at risk -
and they should pay a fair price. "There should be no deflections to
Epstein or anything else, and any Republicans involved should be
focused only on opening up our Country, and fixing the massive
damage caused by the Democrats!", he continued.
In a separate post, Trump reiterated that he believed Democrats were
"using the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax to try and deflect from their
massive failures, in particular, their most recent one - THE
SHUTDOWN!"
Congress is potentially hours away from voting on a discharge
petition that would force a vote to release the main files.
For months, just four Republicans had penned their signatures on
the discharge petition. But in early November, concern swelled
among GOP lawmakers that Trump's relationship with Jeffrey
Epstein was even cozier than previously understood: A few
conservative representatives with ties to the FBI and the Justice
Department spilled last week that the true details of the
Epstein files are "worse" for Trump than previously reported.
Apparently trying to unravel conservative support for the
files' release, Trump phoned his MAGA acolytes yesterday in
an unsuccessful attempt to get them to remove their
signatures from the petition.
Some files released by House Democrats early today shed even
more light on the Trump-Epstein connection, illustrating that as
late as 2011 Epstein was grateful Trump had stayed quiet about
abuse that had taken place at one of the financier's residences. The
"dog that hasn't barked is Trump", Epstein wrote to his
longtime girlfriend and criminal associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, at
the time. When queried by Michael Wolff in 2019 about the
extent of Trump's knowledge of abductions of young girls,
Epstein remarked: "Of course he knew about the girls he
asked Ghislaine to stop."
[TrumPutin, still:
- lies that Democrats created HIS government shut-down,
- hides facts from the government AND the nation,
- orders Republicans to avoid learning about, let alone releasing,
HIS unlawful acts, and
- calls Republicans who no longer do his evil "very bad, or
stupid" for daring to escape HIS trap.
TrumPutin, as always, tries to pin HIS evil doings upon others.]
Randy Rainbow and "Donald Trump": "Big Phony
Schmuck!" (5-min. YouTube video; Randy
Rainbow, November 10, 2025)
Randy lectures Donald in a pseudo White House interview,
then skewers serenades him with a new Randy
Rainbow song parody.
Brittney Melton: Senators
Reach Deal To Re-Open The Government. (14-min.
podcast; NPR, November 10, 2025)
A bipartisan group of senators reached a deal last night to
reopen the government and end the longest shutdown in U.S.
history. The vote on the first procedural step was 60
to 40, with seven Democrats and one independent joining most
Republicans on the measure. The agreement would fund
the government through Jan. 30.
Along with the stop-gap measure to fund the government, the
Democrats who defected received a promise of a vote on health
care, NPR's Claudia Grisales tells Up First. Some
of the Democrats who voted no were furious about the defection.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren stated that the defection was a terrible
mistake and that the American people want them to fight for
health care. The Senate has several hurdles
to clear before
the measure can be passed - and even then, it will
need to pass the House.
The Trump administration now has two days to increase SNAP
benefits from 65% to 100% after a federal appeals
court refused a request to pause a lower court's orders to do so.
The administration could ask
the U.S. Supreme Court to get involved in the
matter for the second time in just a few days.
Another battle is unfolding involving states that have
already paid out full benefits after a federal judge ordered
it, but before the higher court said "Not so fast!",
NPR's Tovia Smith says.
Much of these legal battles could be rendered moot
with the expectation that when the government reopens,
Congress can appropriate SNAP funding for the fiscal year.
Smith says there is no certainty as to when families will
receive the benefits after the shutdown ends - but in the past,
states motivated
to get benefits flowing did so within a matter of days.
Helen Coster, John Shiffman, Christine Soares, Alexandra Ulmer and
Linda So: A
Reuters Special Report: In Trump 2.0, MAGA-Aligned
Influencers And Media Emerge As The New Mainstream.
(Reuters, November 8, 2025)
A Reuters examination details how rightist influencers and
Trump officials have formed a powerful alliance, working
together to target perceived adversaries, amplify false claims
and reshape the media landscape. The shift comes as a
growing number of social platforms and traditional outlets
accommodate Trump.
For decades, Republicans railed against what they saw as a
liberal media establishment shaping American politics from the
left. Nearly a year into U.S. President Donald Trump's second
term, that narrative is flipping. A new constellation of influencers,
billionaire moguls and social-media platforms – many embracing
or amplifying White House themes – is pulling the nation's
information ecosystem to the right.
Right-wing influencers and conservative media personalities, often
working in lockstep with Trump officials, have become a potent
force in a widening campaign of retribution against perceived
enemies of the Trump administration. Empowered by
ownership and technology shifts in the media and bolstered by
financial incentives, these figures help discredit Trump's
rivals and amplify his administration's talking points
and false claims, blurring boundaries between official
messaging and private-sector news and opinion.
Jennifer Ludden: Trump
Administration Ordered To Restore Full SNAP Benefits BY
TOMORROW. (NPR, November 6, 2025)
A Rhode Island federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to
find enough money to restore full funding for SNAP benefits
by tomorrow.
In failing to fully fund the food-assistance program that covers
42-million low-income Americans, U.S. District Court Judge
John McConnell Jr. said the government "failed to
consider the harms individuals who rely on those benefits would
suffer." He also said President Trump showed "intent to
defy a court order" when he posted on Truth Social
this week that SNAP benefits would not restart until after the
federal shutdown was over - a comment that was walked back
by the White House.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture swiftly appealed the
judge's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First
Circuit, keeping food aid in limbo. In a
statement to NPR, the USDA blamed
Senate Democrats for withholding services to promote their
agenda and compromising "not only SNAP, but farm programs,
food inspection, animal and plant disease protection, rural
development, and protecting federal lands."
The judge's order this afternoon comes in response to a challenge
filed by cities and nonprofits after the administration said it
would halt funding for the program on Nov. 1. McConnell and
another federal judge in Boston ordered the government to use
emergency funds to keep SNAP funding flowing, but Trump
administration officials said it was only able to partially cover
the payments.
"The court could not be more clear", said Skye
Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, one the
groups that brought the lawsuit. "The Trump-Vance
administration must stop playing politics with people's lives by
delaying SNAP payments they are obligated to issue."
[Perfectly stated, Mr. Perryman! See yesterday's Robert Reich
article, below.]
Senate
Convenes, As Government Shutdown Breaks Record For
Longest In U.S. History. (WATCH LIVE;
AP News/PBS News, November 5, 2025)
Government shutdown enters 36th day, breaking record set
during Trump's first term as impact spreads nationwide.
The Senate is scheduled to convene today at 10AM
ET.
[Watch in the player above.]
Michelle L. Price and Jill Colvin: Mamdani
Tells Trump That New York Is Ready To Fight, After President's
Threats Fail To Thwart Voters. (AP News/PBS News,
November 5, 2025)
Zohran Mamdani wasted little time as mayor-elect of New
York City before making clear that he sees part of his new
role as standing up to the president of the United States,
who had threatened not only to defund the city if he
won but also to arrest and deport him.
Mamdani, a Democrat, addressed
the Republican president directly and at length
from the stage at his victory party in Brooklyn, last night: "Donald
Trump, since I know you're watching, I have four words for you: Turn
the volume up", he said, before declaring, "If
anyone can show a nation betrayed by Donald Trump how to defeat
him, it is the city that gave rise to him."
Mamdani, who was born in Uganda and became
a naturalized American citizen after graduating from college,
went on to cast himself as the embodiment of resistance:"New
York will remain a city of immigrants, a city built by
immigrants, powered by immigrants and, as of tonight, led by an
immigrant", he said. "So hear me, President Trump, when
I say this: To get to ANY of us, you will have to get through
ALL of us."
Trump, who has spent months insulting Mamdani and warning that
the city would be ruined if he won, seemed to be watching.
"…AND SO IT BEGINS!, he posted on social media as Mamdani spoke.
Mamdani, a democratic socialist who campaigned on a
slate of far-left progressive policies and a cheery optimism
that stands in stark contrast to Trump's darker and hard-line
tactics, is expected to continue to face the president's
persistent political bashing - along with a federal government
that may try to thwart his agenda.
"Mayor Trump": New York has remained relatively unscathed by
Trump's administration, as he has targeted cities
including Los Angeles and Washington, dispatching the National
Guard. The current mayor, Eric Adams, enjoyed an
unusual alliance with the Republican president, whose
administration dropped a federal corruption case against the
mayor so he could better assist with the president's
immigration agenda.
Robert Reich: The
True Test Of Our Progress. Trump Has Put America Into Reverse.
(Substack, November 5, 2025)
The Democrats had a great day yesterday. It's crucial
that they hone their economic message for next year's midterms
on affordability, based in fairness.
Trump is doing the opposite. Although a federal court ordered
Trump to continue to provide food stamps to about 42-million
low-income Americans who depend on them, Trump yesterday
threatened to deny them anyway until the end of the
government shutdown. In a post on social media, he said
benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,
commonly referred to as food stamps, "will be given only
when the Radical-Left Democrats open up the government, which
they can easily do, and not before!"
How low Trump has sunk!
Eighty-eight years ago, in his Second Inaugural Address, Franklin
D. Roosevelt told America, "The test of our progress is not
whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it
is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
It was not a test of the nation's military might
or of the size of the national economy. It was
a test of our moral authority. We had a duty to comfort the
afflicted, even if that required afflicting the comfortable.
The Trump regime has adopted the reverse metric. The test of its
progress is whether it adds to the abundance of those who have
much and provides less for those who have too little. It is
passing this test with flying colors.
The regime initially signaled its willingness to tap $4.65-Billion
in emergency money to fund food stamps, which would cover
about half of this month’s benefits. As a result, some food
aid would have started to go to American families who need it, but
not nearly as much as they require - and not for weeks. New
applicants this month wouldn’t get any.
Now, in direct defiance of the judge's order, Trump is
saying no food stamps will be provided at all - unless
congressional Democrats relent on their demand.
And what is that demand? That lower-income Americans
continue to receive subsidized health care. Otherwise, health
care premiums for millions of lower-income Americans will
skyrocket next year by an average of 30% because the
Trump Republican "Big Beautiful" (Big Ugly) bill slashed
Obamacare subsidies.
Republicans had rammed the Big Ugly through Congress without
giving Senate Democrats an opportunity to filibuster it
because Republicans used a process called "reconciliation",
requiring only a majority vote of the Senate.
The Big Ugly also requires Medicaid applicants and enrollees
- also low-income - to document at least 80
hours per month of work. Many people dependent on Medicaid won’t
be able to do this, either because they’re incapable of
working or won’t be able to do the required paperwork to qualify for
an exemption from the work requirement.
All told, the Big Ugly cuts roughly $1-Trillion over the
next decade from programs for which the main beneficiaries are
the poor and working class, and gives about $1-Trillion
in tax benefits to the richest members of our society. It is
the most dramatic reversal of FDR's moral test in American
history.
In the face of this outrage, the shutdown is the only
practical leverage Democrats have.
Last weekend, just as millions of low-income Americans were
losing their food stamps, Trump threw a lush "Great Gatsby"-themed
party at his Mar-a-Lago estate, replete with 1920s flappers
and Gatsby-inspired music from the Roaring Twenties. Some critics
have called it “tone deaf,” but it was an accurate rendition
of the tone Trump has set for America: Trump is
throwing a huge party for America's wealthy - giving them tax
cuts and regulatory rollbacks to ensure that their
wealth (and support for him) continues to grow.
Meanwhile, he is throwing to poor and working-class Americans
the red meat of hatefulness - hate of immigrants, people of
color, the "deep state", "socialists", "communists", transgender
people, and Democrats. This is the formula strongmen
have used for a century - more wealth for the wealthy,
more bigotry for the working-class and poor - until the
entire facade crumbles under the weight of its own hypocrisy.
But yesterday, millions of American voters refused to go
along with this unfairness. They repudiated, loudly and clearly,
the formula Trump and his regime have used.
It is now the responsibility of all of us - whether
Democrat or Republican or Independent; whether wealthy or middle
class or working class or poor; whether conservative or
progressive - to return the nation to a path that is MORALLY
SUSTAINABLE.
[TrumPutin be damned! He always was. THEY always were. It's HIS
CALL whether Congress can return to session immediately. Just
STOP STEALING FROM OUR COUNTRY - and GIVE IT BACK with a BIG TARIFF
attached!]
Joel Rose: FAA
Will Reduce Air Traffic By 10% At Many Airports To
Maintain Safety. (NPR, November 5, 2025)
As the U.S. government shutdown enters a record 36th day,
air traffic controllers, who are required to work without pay,
are feeling the squeeze.
The FAA plans to reduce air traffic in 40 "high-volume markets"
beginning in two days. FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford
told reporters the agency wants to reduce the pressure at those
airports before safety is compromised.
The FAA has already been delaying flights at some airports because
of widespread staffing shortages among air traffic
controllers. Some have taken on second jobs, and many
are calling out sick. Even before the shutdown, the system was
more than 3,000 certified controllers short.
[TrumPutin's arbitrary government shutdown continues to cause
hardships and deaths in many ways, including today's plane crash]
Return to main section of Money
Is Not Wealth.